216digital.
Web Accessibility

Phase 1
Web Remediation for Lawsuit Settlement & Prevention

Phase 2
Real-World Accessibility

a11y.Radar
Ongoing Monitoring and Maintenance

Consultation & Training

Is Your Website Vulnerable to Frivolous Lawsuits?
Get a Free Web Accessibility Audit to Learn Where You Stand
Find Out Today!

Web Design & Development

Marketing

PPC Management
Google & Social Media Ads

Professional SEO
Increase Organic Search Strength

Interested in Marketing?
Speak to an Expert about marketing opportunities for your brand to cultivate support and growth online.
Contact Us

About

Blog

Contact Us

  • Build Accessibility In, Don’t Bolt It On

    A brand-new website can feel polished and future-proof—right up until someone with a screen reader runs into a dead-end menu or a keyboard user can’t tab past the hero banner. Suddenly the “finished” project is back on the operating table, costing hours (and budget) you’d already spent elsewhere.

    When accessibility planning is woven into the first brainstorm—alongside color palettes, user flows, and content themes—those last-minute scrambles disappear. Decisions get crisper, code stays cleaner, and every visitor, regardless of ability, enjoys the same smooth path through your pages.

    Think of accessibility less as decorative trim and more as the blueprint that holds the whole structure together. Start with it, build on it, and you’ll launch faster, spend less, and welcome more people from day one.

    What Does “Bolting It On” Look Like?

    Many organizations treat accessibility like a retrofit. The site is already built, the design is approved, and the content is live. Only then does someone say, “Wait—what about screen reader support? What about color contrast? What if this form can’t be used with a keyboard?”

    Now you’re in damage control. Fixing accessibility issues post-launch can require rewriting code, redesigning components, and delaying updates. Even worse, you may be stuck with baked-in barriers that are difficult or costly to correct. For example:

    • Rebuilding menus that were designed without keyboard navigation in mind
    • Rewriting interactive components that don’t support screen readers
    • Replacing an entire color palette because contrast ratios fail WCAG

    Accessibility planning means thinking about inclusion as you sketch wireframes, select a CMS, or build your first component. It means your developers write semantic HTML, your designers test color contrast before finalizing a palette, and your content creators write with clarity and structure.

    When accessibility planning is part of the DNA of your project, you get better results—faster and with fewer surprises.

    Accessibility Planning = Smart, Strategic Design

    Now imagine the opposite scenario: your team is starting a new project or redesign. Right at the beginning, you ask:

    • Who are our users, and what diverse needs do they have?
    • Are we designing this interface to be usable without a mouse?
    • Can our color and font choices work for users with low vision or dyslexia?
    • Are we writing alt text for images, and using descriptive link text?
    • Is this form easy to complete using assistive technology?

    These questions don’t slow you down. They guide your decisions from the ground up.

    Accessibility planning means thinking about inclusion as you sketch wireframes, select a CMS, or build your first component. It means your developers write semantic HTML, your designers test color contrast before finalizing a palette, and your content creators write with clarity and structure.

    When accessibility is part of the DNA of your project, you get better results—faster and with fewer surprises.

    6 Stages Where Accessibility Belongs

    Here’s how to build accessibility into your process, stage by stage:

    1. Discovery and Strategy

    Before any code or design work begins, include accessibility planning as a strategic priority. Define your target users, including those with disabilities. Document accessibility goals and requirements as part of your project scope.

    Make accessibility a deliverable—not an afterthought.

    2. UX and Visual Design

    Design with inclusivity in mind. That means:

    • High contrast color palettes
    • Clear visual hierarchy
    • Large, legible typography
    • Components that look good and function well with assistive tech
    • Clear focus indicators and logical navigation

    Don’t assume visual design is just aesthetics—it impacts usability for everyone.

    3. Content Creation

    Content creators play a major role in accessibility planning. They should:

    • Use descriptive headings and meaningful subheadings
    • Write clear, concise link text (“Download the annual report” instead of “Click here”)
    • Provide transcripts or captions for audio and video
    • Write meaningful alt text for important images

    Training your content team on accessibility saves hours of rewriting down the road.

    4. Front-End Development

    This is where accessibility really comes alive. Developers should use:

    • Semantic HTML (correct use of <nav>, <button>, <label>, etc.)
    • ARIA labels only when needed—not as a shortcut for poor structure
    • Keyboard operability for all interactive elements
    • Logical tab order and skip navigation links

    Accessibility-friendly code isn’t just better for screen readers—it’s more resilient, scalable, and SEO-friendly too.

    5. Testing and QA

    Accessibility testing isn’t just automated. While tools like Lighthouse, or WAVE help flag obvious issues, real users and manual testing are critical.

    • Test with screen readers like NVDA or VoiceOver
    • Navigate your site using only a keyboard
    • Check forms for proper labels and error handling
    • Test responsiveness and zoom up to 200%

    Bring in users with disabilities if possible. Their feedback is irreplaceable.

    6. Launch and Maintenance

    Accessibility doesn’t stop at launch. It’s an ongoing effort. As you add new features or content, revisit your accessibility standards. Schedule regular audits. Monitor legal developments. Consider automated tools like a11y.Radar for early issue detection.

    The Human Side of Accessibility

    It’s easy to talk about accessibility in technical terms, but at its core, it’s about people.

    Think about someone using a screen reader to access your site. Or someone with motor limitations who can’t use a mouse. Or someone dealing with temporary impairments—a broken wrist, eye strain, or even just a noisy environment where audio isn’t practical.

    Building accessibility in from the start isn’t about compliance for its own sake. It’s about treating all users with dignity. It’s about believing that digital spaces should work for everyone, regardless of ability.

    Common Pitfalls to Avoid

    Even with good intentions, teams can fall into these traps:

    • Assuming accessibility is only the developer’s job: Accessibility is a shared responsibility across design, content, and engineering.
    • Waiting until the QA phase: Accessibility can’t be “tested in” at the end. It must be designed and developed.
    • Relying too much on overlays or plugins: Widgets don’t fix inaccessible code. In some cases, they create more problems than they solve.
    • Failing to document decisions: Keep a living accessibility checklist. It helps ensure continuity across teams and updates.

    Why It Pays Off

    Here’s what you gain when you build accessibility in from day one:

    • Faster development: Fewer reworks, cleaner code
    • Lower costs: Avoid costly redesigns and retrofits
    • Happier users: Better usability for everyone, not just people with disabilities
    • Improved SEO: Accessibility often overlaps with search best practices
    • Reduced legal risk: Stay ahead of ADA and state-level laws like Colorado HB 21-1110
    • Stronger brand reputation: Inclusion signals leadership and care

    Most importantly, you build a digital presence that welcomes, respects, and serves more people exactly like the web was meant to work.

    No Ifs, Ands, or Bugs—Just Accessibility Plans

    Accessibility doesn’t belong on a post-launch checklist or in a future phase that never quite gets prioritized. It belongs at the table from day one—when you’re mapping out user journeys, designing components, and writing your very first lines of code.

    By making accessibility planning a core part of your workflow, you avoid costly rework, improve overall quality, and create digital experiences that serve more people, more effectively. It’s not about adding more to your plate—it’s about building smarter from the start.

    If you’re ready to move from fixing to future-proofing, 216digital can help. Our phased accessibility services are designed to meet you where you are, guide your team, and strengthen your site’s foundation for the long haul. Let’s make accessibility part of how you build—every time.

    Greg McNeil

    June 20, 2025
    Testing & Remediation
    Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, Accessibility testing, Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Remediation, web development

  • Custom Accessibility Audits: Tailored for Your Website

    Most websites aren’t trying to be inaccessible—it just kind of happens. A few plugins here, a third-party widget there, and before you know it, people using screen readers or keyboard navigation are hitting roadblocks you didn’t even know were there.

    If you’ve ever felt unsure about where your site stands or thought, “We added a tool—so we’re probably fine,” you’re not alone. But the truth is, real accessibility takes more than a one-click solution. It takes intention, testing, and a plan. And with digital accessibility lawsuits on the rise, ignoring the gaps is more of a liability than ever.

    If staying ADA-compliant is your goal, you need more than a quick fix. You need custom accessibility audits, meaningful remediation, and a partner who can help you maintain compliance long-term.

    The Real Limitations of Automation Tools

    Automated accessibility tools are everywhere, and it’s easy to see the appeal. They promise a quick scan and some instant fixes—like adding alt text, adjusting colors, or offering a text-size toggle. It feels like progress. But these tools can only go so far.

    They often miss what really matters: how someone with a disability actually uses your site. Screen readers, keyboard navigation, and cognitive-friendly layouts aren’t things most automation can truly understand or evaluate.

    What They Miss (And Why It Matters)

    Here are a few areas where automation usually falls short:

    • Screen reader experiences: Automated tools won’t tell you if your navigation makes sense when read aloud.
    • Keyboard usability: They don’t catch when menus or popups trap users who don’t use a mouse.
    • Structural clarity: Bad heading structures or mislabeled buttons often go unnoticed.
    • Interactive elements: Modals, forms, and sliders might work visually but break down when tested for accessibility.

    Even more concerning? Courts are increasingly ruling that automation alone doesn’t meet ADA requirements. In some cases, relying on overlays without fixing underlying issues can actually increase your legal risk—especially for busy sites that handle transactions. This is why custom accessibility audits remain the gold standard for identifying real, user-impacting issues.

    Why Real Testing Still Matters

    You can’t fix what you don’t experience—and that’s the heart of manual testing. It’s not just about running a tool and checking boxes. It’s about walking through your site the way someone with a disability might.

    That means:

    • Navigating with a keyboard and nothing else.
    • Using a screen reader to browse your content.
    • Testing user flows like logging in, searching, or checking out—without assuming the user can see or use a mouse.

    The Kind of Issues Manual Testing Uncovers

    This type of testing uncovers issues that automation never will:

    • Dropdowns that don’t announce themselves
    • Buttons that lack clear, descriptive labels
    • Interactive sections that lose focus or confuse navigation
    • Forms that look fine visually but are hard to use with assistive tech

    At 216digital, we don’t just skim the surface. During custom accessibility audits, we follow real user journeys—from homepage to checkout—so we can see how the experience actually holds up. It’s not about passing a test. It’s about making sure everyone can use your site smoothly.

    What Custom Accessibility Audits Really Looks Like

    Once you know what’s broken, fixing it takes more than flipping a switch. True remediation means tailoring fixes to your site’s layout, content, and functionality—not applying a generic patch.

    That’s why we focus on changes that make a measurable difference for real users. Things like:

    • Making sure users can see where their keyboard focus is at all times
    • Adding ARIA roles and labels so screen readers can understand what’s on the page
    • Improving contrast without compromising your brand’s look

    Examples of Targeted Fixes

    We also fix the kinds of problems that create the most user friction:

    • Popups and modals that trap keyboard or screen reader users
    • Sliders or videos that move too quickly without user control

    There’s no one-size-fits-all approach. Each website is different. Each problem needs a thoughtful, code-aware fix. That’s where custom remediation stands apart—it solves the right problem in the right way.

    Keeping Accessibility on Track with a11y.Radar

    Accessibility isn’t something you do once and forget about. Websites change—new content, new plugins, new designs—and with those changes come new risks.

    That’s where our ongoing monitoring tool, a11y.Radar, makes the difference.

    It acts like a digital safety net by:

    • Running regular scans to check for new or recurring issues
    • Prioritizing problems based on what’s most important to fix first
    • Providing clear reports that your team can actually understand and act on
    • Using the same scanning methods many law firms rely on before filing lawsuits

    Stay Ahead, Don’t Fall Behind

    Think of it like maintenance for your website’s health. You wouldn’t skip oil changes for your car—and keeping your site accessible works the same way. a11y.Radar helps you stay proactive so small issues don’t turn into bigger problems later. And when paired with custom accessibility audits, you gain a complete strategy for long-term digital compliance.

    Why Visibility Increases Your Risk

    The more visible your business becomes, the more pressure there is to get accessibility right.

    In just May alone, 445 new digital accessibility lawsuits were filed in the U.S.—many aimed at online retailers, especially those using Shopify or WooCommerce. These platforms offer convenience, but often rely on templates or plugins that haven’t been fully tested for accessibility.

    The Real-World Consequences

    It’s not personal—these lawsuits are often triggered by bots scanning the web for compliance issues. If your site trips a red flag, it could end up on a law firm’s radar.

    The risks are real:

    • Expensive legal battles or settlement costs
    • Strained customer trust
    • Hits to your brand reputation
    • Increased insurance premiums

    The upside? When you invest in custom accessibility audits and monitoring, you dramatically lower your risk—and build a better experience for every user.

    Beyond Legal Advice: Why You Need Technical Support

    A good legal team can help you understand where you’re exposed. But they won’t fix your navigation, rewrite your forms, or troubleshoot your ARIA labels.

    That’s where a hands-on partner makes the difference.

    What a Technical Accessibility Partner Does

    At 216digital, we’ve supported hundreds of websites—small shops and enterprise platforms alike. Our approach is practical, technical, and built around real-life use cases. We don’t just tell you what’s wrong—we fix it, explain it, and set you up to manage accessibility long-term.

    Here’s what we bring to the table:

    • Clear developer guidance tailored to your platform
    • Integrated testing and remediation that fits into your current workflow
    • Ongoing support and monitoring after the fixes are live

    It’s not about being perfect—it’s about building lasting accessibility habits. And having a partner who helps you stay on track.

    Accessibility Isn’t Obligation—It’s Opportunity

    It’s your chance to build a brand that’s genuinely inclusive, appealing to a wider audience and avoiding costly legal pitfalls. Automation tools alone won’t get you there, but custom accessibility audits, hands-on remediation, and proactive monitoring will.

    If you’re done guessing and ready to confidently say your site is accessible, reach out to us at 216digital. We’ll clearly show you where your site stands, guide you through practical improvements, and keep accessibility effortless and ongoing. Because ultimately, making your website accessible isn’t just smart—it’s the kind of thoughtful action your customers will notice and appreciate.

    Greg McNeil

    June 17, 2025
    Testing & Remediation
    Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, Accessibility testing, automated testing, custom accessibility audits, Manual Testing, Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Remediation, Website Accessibility

  • How to Conduct Accessibility User Testing

    You can pass every automated test and still fail your users. That’s the uncomfortable truth behind many accessibility initiatives. True accessibility goes far beyond technical compliance—it’s about how people actually experience your product. Accessibility user testing isn’t a last-minute box to check; it’s a powerful way to build digital experiences that work for everyone.

    In this article, we’ll walk you through how to conduct accessibility user testing in a way that’s respectful, strategic, and truly impactful. Whether you’re a UX professional, web developer, or product manager, you’ll leave with clear, practical guidance to take your testing process from good intentions to real results.

    What Automated and Manual Testing Miss

    Accessibility tools like Google Lighthouse and WAVE are fantastic for catching code-level issues—missing alt text, low contrast, missing labels. But that’s just the surface. These tools don’t understand user intent. They can’t tell if your focus order makes sense, or if a screen reader user can actually make sense of your modal flow.

    Manual testing helps fill some of those gaps. Keyboard-only navigation, zoom testing, and screen reader simulations can uncover a lot—especially when done by experienced testers. But even this falls short of the lived experience.

    Take a modal dialog as an example. You might trap focus correctly, label everything with ARIA, and pass every automated check. But in practice? A screen reader user may still struggle because the modal doesn’t announce in the expected order or re-focus correctly on close. That’s the kind of thing only accessibility user testing with real people can reveal.

    Why User Testing with People with Disabilities Is the Game-Changer

    No simulation can match the perspective of someone who uses assistive tech every day. People who rely on screen readers, switch devices, or voice navigation uncover friction and failure points that even seasoned accessibility professionals can overlook.

    Here’s the shift: stop thinking of users with disabilities as edge cases. They’re not. They’re part of your audience—your customers, students, patients, or users. Designing for them improves your product for everyone.

    Accessibility user testing isn’t just about catching bugs. It’s a critical feedback loop that improves usability, product-market fit, and even innovation. When you integrate it early and often, you don’t just “fix accessibility”—you build better experiences from the ground up.

    Planning Your Accessibility User Testing Program

    Define Clear Objectives

    Start with real-world tasks. Instead of running a general audit, design your tests around meaningful user journeys:

    • Is it possible for a blind user to complete a purchase from start to finish?
    • Someone with low dexterity—can they successfully submit your job application form?
    • And what about users with cognitive differences—can they easily locate your support content?

    Clear, task-based goals help you focus your sessions and gather actionable insights.

    Build a Representative Participant Pool

    Many teams fall into the trap of testing only with blind screen reader users. That’s important—but not enough.

    To make your testing inclusive:

    • Include participants with motor impairments, cognitive disabilities, low vision, and voice input users.
    • Recruit from diverse sources and advocacy organizations.
    • Pay your testers. Always. Accessibility user testing is specialized work and should never rely on free labor. Follow ethical compensation practices and provide flexible scheduling and support.

    Pre-Test Logistics and Respectful Setup

    Before the session, send a tech-check checklist to participants. This might include browser compatibility, assistive tech setup, and ensuring a quiet space.

    Also, ask about accommodations in advance:

    • Do they prefer screen sharing or phone interviews?
    • Do they need additional time?
    • Would they like the questions in advance?

    Offering flexible formats—remote, hybrid, or in-person—ensures participants can engage comfortably. Respect starts with planning.

    Running Meaningful and Inclusive Testing Sessions

    Session Structure That Works

    Start with a warm-up task or small talk to ease anxiety and build trust. Remember, this isn’t a test of the participant—it’s a test with them.

    Structure your session around a few focused tasks. Example:

    • “Please use the site to find and register for a webinar.”
    • “Try to contact customer support using your preferred method.”

    Observe closely—but don’t interrupt unless necessary. Let participants narrate their thought process if they’re comfortable. This gives you insight into confusion points, workaround strategies, and breakdowns in usability.

    Accessibility user testing is about listening. Often, the most valuable insights come not from what users can or can’t do, but from the effort it takes them to do it.

    Ask Thoughtful, Open-Ended Questions

    Instead of “Did that work for you?” try:

    • “How did that process feel?”
    • “What was easy or hard about that task?”
    • “Was there anything that surprised or confused you?”

    Create space for honest feedback, and resist the urge to jump in with fixes. Your goal is to understand, not defend.

    From Feedback to Action

    Once your accessibility user testing sessions are complete, consolidate your notes into themes. What barriers kept coming up? Were there recurring moments of friction?

    Tag issues by severity and impact. Some will be quick fixes—labeling buttons, adjusting tab order. Others may require bigger design shifts. Either way, track them in your product backlog and prioritize them alongside other critical bugs.

    Also, share findings with your team. Make video clips or quotes part of your sprint reviews or design critiques. Seeing real users struggle—or succeed—can be a powerful motivator for accessibility buy-in across your organization.

    Make It Part of Your Process

    Accessibility user testing isn’t a one-off effort. Integrate it into every major phase of development:

    • Early design prototypes
    • Beta versions before release
    • Major feature updates

    The earlier you involve users, the more you catch—and the less expensive it is to fix. Consider building an accessibility testing panel you can tap into regularly. Make it part of your QA cycle, not just a compliance afterthought.

    User-Tested, People-Approved

    Automated tools and manual audits are important—but they only take you so far. To build truly inclusive experiences, you need to go deeper. Accessibility user testing gives you something no tool ever will: real human insight.

    By listening to and designing with people with disabilities, you move from compliance to compassion. From checking boxes to opening doors. From good enough to genuinely excellent. And that’s not just better accessibility—it’s better UX, period.

    If you’re ready to elevate your accessibility strategy with meaningful user feedback, 216digital can help. Schedule an ADA briefing with our accessibility team to discuss how user testing fits into a comprehensive, long-term solution. Together, we’ll help you build experiences that work for everyone—starting now.

    Greg McNeil

    June 13, 2025
    Testing & Remediation, Uncategorized
    Accessibility testing, Manual Testing, User Experience, user testing, Users experience, Web Accessibility Remediation

  • Law Firms Aren’t Built for Accessibility Remediation Services

    When a demand letter lands in your inbox, or an ADA-related lawsuit hits your desk, your first thought might be to call a lawyer. That’s a natural reaction—after all, legal issues usually call for legal help.

    But here’s where things get a little more complicated: if the problem is your website’s accessibility, then legal advice alone won’t fix it. And that’s where many businesses take a wrong turn. Legal teams can guide you through the paperwork, but they’re rarely the ones who dig into your code, address the real barriers, or help you prevent the next lawsuit.

    This article walks you through why relying on a law firm to handle accessibility remediation services might not be the best move—and what a smarter, more effective approach looks like.

    The Problem: Law Firms Handle Lawsuits—Not Code

    Let’s be clear—attorneys have an important role. If you’ve received a demand letter or lawsuit, they can help you respond, negotiate, or represent you in court. But legal involvement doesn’t make the accessibility problem go away. The root issue—your website not working for people with disabilities—still remains. And it’s that issue that continues to carry legal and reputational risk.

    Most law firms don’t have in-house technical teams. No developers, no certified accessibility experts, no usability testers. So what happens? They either outsource the actual accessibility remediation services to third-party vendors (often charging a premium along the way) or provide high-level reports filled with checklists that leave your dev team guessing at what to do next.

    That means you’re still on the hook for the real work—and possibly paying more for it.

    Hidden Risk #1: You’ll Pay More for Less

    Law firms typically charge by the hour, which makes sense for legal tasks like reviewing contracts or negotiating settlements. But when they apply those same rates to accessibility-related work—such as interpreting WCAG guidelines, coordinating with vendors, or reviewing audit summaries—it turns into a costly game of telephone.

    You end up paying for layers of administrative overhead that slow down progress and don’t actually improve your website.

    Worse, you might not even realize where the money is going. Legal fees can pile up quickly without producing the tangible results your business actually needs: a compliant, accessible, functional website. For small to mid-size organizations trying to manage both compliance and budget, this model is hard to justify.

    Hidden Risk #2: The Fixes May Not Be Complete

    Fixing accessibility isn’t about running a quick scan and addressing a handful of errors. Real remediation requires technical precision, contextual judgment, and manual testing—especially with screen readers and keyboard navigation. It involves understanding how accessibility issues present in code and how they affect the user experience for people with different disabilities.

    Many law firms don’t have the tools—or the trained personnel—to go that deep. And their vendor partners often lean heavily on automated tools that only catch surface-level issues.

    Here’s what that kind of partial remediation can miss:

    • Form fields without accessible labels
    • Improper heading structures that confuse screen readers
    • Modal windows that can’t be closed without a mouse
    • Buttons or links that don’t receive keyboard focus
    • Dynamic content changes that don’t alert assistive technologies

    These aren’t fringe cases—they’re exactly the kinds of issues that trigger lawsuits. Unfortunately, teams often overlook them when legal experts, rather than technical specialists, lead accessibility remediation efforts.

    Hidden Risk #3: No Plan for the Long Term

    Even if your legal team manages to patch things up for now, accessibility isn’t a one-and-done situation. Websites evolve. New content is added. Platforms update. If you don’t have an ongoing plan, you risk falling out of compliance all over again—and landing back in legal trouble.

    Law firms are built for casework, not for long-term technical oversight. Most won’t offer monitoring services, provide training for your content team, or stay engaged as your digital properties change over time. Without a partner who understands how to maintain accessibility remediation services, you’re left exposed.

    That’s why sustainable compliance calls for a proactive strategy—one that goes beyond legal checkboxes and focuses on real-world usability, continuous improvement, and future-proofing your site.

    What Proper Accessibility Remediation Services Look Like

    To address ADA compliance issues the right way, you need more than legal advice—you need a full-service accessibility team that knows how to diagnose, prioritize, and implement lasting solutions.

    Here’s what effective accessibility remediation services typically involve:

    1. In-Depth Accessibility Audit

    Experienced accessibility professionals start by reviewing your site against WCAG 2.1 A/AA standards using both automated and manual testing. This ensures nothing gets missed. A proper audit covers the following:

    • Screen reader testing using tools like NVDA, JAWS, or VoiceOver
    • Keyboard-only navigation analysis
    • Color contrast checks
    • Semantic HTML review
    • ARIA role validation for dynamic content

    It’s this level of testing that uncovers real usability barriers.

    2. A Clear, Actionable Roadmap

    Instead of a vague checklist, a solid remediation team will provide a prioritized list of issues, each translated into plain language with clear technical recommendations. The goal is to make it easy for developers to understand what needs to be fixed—and how.

    3. Code-Level Fixes

    This is the heart of remediation. A professional team doesn’t just point out problems—they roll up their sleeves and solve them. That includes adjusting templates, improving focus states, rewriting inaccessible components, and ensuring your code structure supports screen readers and keyboard navigation.

    It’s hands-on work—and it requires skilled front-end developers who understand both accessibility and UX.

    4. Real-World Usability Testing

    After you make changes, your work isn’t done. Test the updated site again—this time in real-world scenarios using assistive technologies. This step confirms that your remediation efforts actually work for the people they’re designed to support.

    5. Documentation & Legal Support

    While not a substitute for a legal team, many remediation partners provide helpful documentation—such as accessibility statements, conformance reports (like VPATs), and audit results—that demonstrate your organization’s commitment to accessibility. These materials can also support your response if you’re facing legal scrutiny.

    6. Ongoing Monitoring

    Even after remediation, your site should be monitored regularly. A good partner will offer scanning tools like a11y.Radar for testing and alerts to catch issues early—before they turn into compliance risks.

    Why Accessibility Professionals Are the Better Fit

    Accessibility specialists solve the actual problem: they make websites usable for people with disabilities. They work closely with your development, design, and content teams to create solutions that align with your brand, support your UX goals, and meet compliance requirements.

    Unlike law firms, accessibility pros don’t just help you react—they help you prepare. Their job is to prevent problems, not just manage them after the fact.

    They bring technical knowledge, lived user experience insights, and a collaborative mindset to the table. That’s how you get lasting results—not just legal coverage, but a stronger, more inclusive digital presence.

    Conclusion: The Smart Path to Lasting Compliance

    If you’re navigating legal pressure because of an inaccessible website, it’s important to act quickly—but also wisely. Legal teams play a role, yes, but true ADA compliance requires more than legal documents and advice. It takes technical expertise, accessibility remediation services, and a long-term plan that goes beyond checking boxes.

    The right partner doesn’t just help you respond to a lawsuit—they help you prevent the next one by making your website genuinely usable for everyone. That means fewer legal risks, stronger user trust, and a better experience across the board.

    At 216digital, we specialize in real solutions—not just legal responses. From WCAG audits and code-level fixes to usability testing and ongoing monitoring, we help you build and maintain a site that works for everyone.

    Schedule an ADA briefing with our accessibility team today to get clear, honest guidance on what your site needs, what’s at risk, and how to move forward confidently. Let’s make your compliance efforts count—for your users and your business.

    Greg McNeil

    June 4, 2025
    Legal Compliance
    Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, Accessibility testing, ADA Compliance, WCAG, Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Remediation, Website Accessibility

  • Is Manual Accessibility Testing Worth the Time?

    Deadlines move fast. Automated accessibility tools promise faster. It’s no surprise many dev teams lean on them—especially when stakeholders are asking, “Are we compliant yet?” Tools like WAVE and Lighthouse give quick answers, clean reports, and a reassuring sense of progress.

    But here’s the part too many teams miss: automated testing only tells part of the story. The code might check out, but what about the actual experience? Can someone using a screen reader complete a purchase? Can a keyboard user navigate a modal without getting stuck? These are the kinds of issues that don’t show up in automated scans—but absolutely show up in real life.

    If your goal is to build a product that’s not just technically compliant, but genuinely usable and defensible, manual accessibility testing needs to be part of the process. It’s the only way to uncover what automation can’t: nuance, clarity, and usability in the real world.

    In this article, we’ll unpack the value of manual testing, where automated tools fall short, and how a smart hybrid approach gives you better results—and better protection.

    What Is Manual Accessibility Testing?

    Manual accessibility testing is the hands-on process of evaluating a digital product’s usability for people with disabilities—without relying solely on software. This might include:

    • Navigating with only a keyboard
    • Using a screen reader like NVDA, JAWS, or VoiceOver
    • Checking for color contrast by eye
    • Reviewing focus states and logical tab order
    • Testing real-world use cases (like filling out a form or completing a checkout process)

    The goal is to simulate the experience of actual users with assistive technologies and identify barriers beyond code compliance.

    The Appeal (and Limits) of Automated Testing

    Automated accessibility tools like Lighthouse and WAVE have transformed developers’ identification of issues. They quickly scan code for missing alt text, incorrect ARIA roles, form labeling issues, and other violations of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).

    Automated testing is fast and repeatable. It’s ideal for:

    • Initial scans during development
    • Catching basic syntax errors
    • Setting up CI/CD integration for ongoing testing
    • Flagging regressions after code updates

    But here’s the catch: automation can only detect around 25-35% of accessibility issues. The rest requires human judgment.

    What Automated Tools Can’t Catch

    Despite their efficiency, automated tools lack the context and empathy of human testing. Here’s what they consistently miss:

    1. Keyboard Trap Detection: Tools may confirm that an element is focusable, but they won’t always detect when users get stuck in modal dialogs or custom components without a proper way to escape.
    2. Screen Reader Usability: Only a human can determine if the screen reader output is logical, coherent, and meaningful in context. Just because a screen reader reads something doesn’t mean it makes sense to the user.
    3. Visual Focus Indicators: Automated checkers might verify the presence of a focus style, but they can’t confirm if it’s visible or intuitive in a real-world interface.
    4. Form Instructions and Error Messages: Does the screen reader clearly announce the error? Are instructions available before a user makes a mistake? Automation doesn’t evaluate the usability of the experience.
    5. Color Contrast in Context: A contrast checker might say a color combination passes WCAG, but it doesn’t judge readability in real UI conditions (like against busy background images or gradients).
    6. Meaningful Link Text: Tools can flag vague text like “click here,” but they don’t understand if a link in a sentence conveys context when read out of order.
    7. Cognitive Load and Ease of Use: Only a human can evaluate whether a layout or interaction is intuitive for users with cognitive disabilities or limited dexterity.

    In short, automation checks the code; manual accessibility testing checks the experience.

    Why a Hybrid Approach Works Best

    The smartest accessibility strategies combine the speed of automation with the nuance of manual testing. Here’s how they complement each other:

    TaskBest MethodWhy
    Catch missing alt attributesAutomatedFast and reliable for simple HTML validation
    Ensure meaningful alt descriptionsManualContext is required for accuracy
    Validate keyboard navigationManualHumans can detect trap states, confusing order
    Check color contrast ratiosAutomatedUseful for quick scanning
    Judge visual clarity of focus statesManualOnly human vision can determine visibility
    Spot WCAG syntax violationsAutomatedEfficient, especially with CI/CD tools
    Confirm screen reader compatibilityManualRequired for usability assurance
    Test form completion and feedbackManualCritical for real-world workflows

    This hybrid approach is not only more accurate—it’s also more defensible in legal contexts. Suppose you’re remediating a site for ADA compliance or preparing for WCAG conformance claims. In that case, you need evidence that your digital experience has been tested by real users or testers simulating those users.

    Real-World Example: Checkout Accessibility

    Let’s say you’re working on an e-commerce site. An automated test might scan your cart and checkout pages and report:

    • 100% form elements are labeled
    • Contrast ratios are within limits
    • No ARIA roles are missing

    Looks good.

    But a manual tester might uncover:

    • The shipping address form doesn’t announce errors with a screen reader
    • The “Apply Coupon” button can’t be reached with the keyboard alone
    • The payment section’s field focus jumps around unexpectedly
    • The screen reader reads the price table in a confusing order

    These are real barriers that impact sales—and wouldn’t be flagged by automation.

    Manual Accessibility Testing Doesn’t Have to Be Time-Consuming

    Yes, manual testing takes time. But it doesn’t have to grind your project to a halt.

    Here’s how teams can streamline the process:

    • Integrate manual accessibility testing in sprints. Assign accessibility checks to QA or dev team members alongside other functional testing.
    • Use assistive tech simulators early. Even five minutes with VoiceOver or NVDA on a new feature can reveal major issues.
    • Focus on high-impact areas. Prioritize navigation, forms, modals, and anything tied to conversions or essential tasks.
    • Document patterns. Once you’ve tested common components (like dropdowns, date pickers, etc.), reuse them instead of rebuilding.

    And most importantly—train your team. A developer with basic screen reader skills and a solid understanding of WCAG can identify more issues in five minutes than a tool might catch in five hours.

    The Long-Term Payoff

    Manual accessibility testing isn’t just about checking a compliance box—it’s about protecting your users, your brand, and your bottom line.

    Benefits of a hybrid testing strategy include:

    • Fewer false positives and rework
    • Better user experience for everyone
    • Reduced legal risk and stronger compliance
    • Improved SEO and discoverability
    • Greater confidence in product quality

    When teams understand what to test, how to test it, and why it matters, accessibility becomes a natural part of the development workflow—not an afterthought.

    Bridging the Gap Between Code and Experience

    So—is manual accessibility testing worth it?

    Without question. Automated tools are great for speed, consistency, and catching the basics, but they can’t see the experience through a user’s eyes. Manual accessibility testing brings in that essential layer of human judgment, helping your team uncover issues that really affect usability—especially for people navigating with assistive technologies.

    When you pair automation with real-world testing, you’re not just building a site that passes checks—you’re creating something that works better for everyone. It’s a smarter, more resilient way to approach accessibility, especially as legal expectations grow and user expectations rise even faster.

    Curious what that could look like for your team? Schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital. We’ll walk you through our Phase 2 real-world remediation services—designed to help you go beyond code checks and build accessibility that holds up in practice, not just on paper.

    Greg McNeil

    May 15, 2025
    Testing & Remediation
    Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, Accessibility testing, manual audit, Manual Testing, Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Remediation

  • How Often Should You Audit Your Website for Accessibility?

    You’ve already put in the effort to make your website accessible—and that’s no small thing. But accessibility isn’t something you fix once and forget. As your site evolves, even small changes can introduce new issues. That’s where regular check-ins come in. A web accessibility audit helps you catch problems early, stay aligned with current standards, and keep your site working for everyone.

    So how often should you audit your site to maintain that progress? The answer depends on what’s changing—and when. In this article, we’ll break down the key moments when an audit makes sense, the risks of letting things slide, and how ongoing monitoring can help you stay ahead.

    Why Web Accessibility Audits Are Critical

    A web accessibility audit reviews your website’s design, code, and content to identify barriers that could make it hard—or even impossible—for people with disabilities to use your site. These audits typically test against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards, the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act), and other regulations.

    The risks of not auditing regularly are real for small to midsize businesses. Over the past few years, digital accessibility lawsuits have skyrocketed. In 2024 alone, more than 4,000 web accessibility lawsuits were filed under the ADA—and many of those targeted businesses that were unaware they had an issue.

    The cost of defending even a small ADA lawsuit can easily reach tens of thousands of dollars, not to mention the damage to your brand’s reputation. Proactive audits help you spot and fix issues early, keeping your business protected and your customers happy.

    When Should You Audit Your Website for Accessibility?

    While accessibility should be baked into your website maintenance plan, certain milestones require a full web accessibility audit.

    1. After a Website Redesign or Major Update

    If you’ve recently rebranded, relaunched, or significantly redesigned your site, it’s critical to schedule a full accessibility audit. Even small navigation, layout, or feature changes can unintentionally introduce new barriers. Testing right after major updates ensures you catch and fix issues before customers encounter them—and before a potential lawsuit arises.

    2. Before Launching New Features or Products

    Rolling out a new e-commerce section? Adding a chatbot? Introducing video content or online booking? Before new features go live, a web accessibility audit should be part of your quality assurance checklist.

    New code, third-party integrations, and interactive tools can create accessibility gaps. Testing pre-launch helps ensure all users can interact with the new elements, no matter what device or assistive technology they’re using.

    3. Annually (at Minimum)

    Even if your site hasn’t changed much, accessibility standards, best practices, and legal expectations evolve over time. Conducting a comprehensive web accessibility audit at least once a year ensures your site complies with current WCAG standards (currently WCAG 2.1 and moving toward 2.2) and applicable regulations.

    Think of it like an annual checkup for your digital presence: it’s much easier and cheaper to maintain accessibility than to fix major problems down the road.

    4. After User Feedback or Complaints

    If a customer or visitor flags an accessibility issue, that’s a signal to audit right away—not just the problem area but the entire site. User feedback is invaluable because it often reveals real-world issues automated scans might miss. Addressing concerns quickly shows that your business takes accessibility seriously and is committed to serving all users.

    5. When Laws or Guidelines Change

    New accessibility laws, updates to WCAG standards, or changes in court interpretations can raise the bar for compliance. For instance, the Department of Justice recently released new guidance for web accessibility under Title II of the ADA. When legal standards shift, a fresh audit can make sure you’re aligned with the latest requirements.

    Why Ongoing Monitoring Matters

    While annual or event-based audits are critical, they’re not enough. Websites are dynamic—they grow, change, and update constantly. New products, marketing campaigns, and blog posts can all introduce accessibility problems over time.

    That’s where ongoing accessibility monitoring comes in.

    At 216digital, we developed a11y.Radar, a proactive monitoring service that continuously scans your site for accessibility issues. a11y.Radar doesn’t replace manual audits (human expertise is still key!), but it acts as an early warning system—catching errors before they snowball into bigger problems.

    With a11y.Radar, you can:

    • Receive real-time alerts about accessibility regressions
    • Track ongoing improvements
    • Maintain continuous WCAG compliance
    • Reduce your risk of surprise lawsuits

    This approach helps you move from a reactive stance (“fix it after a lawsuit”) to a proactive one (“prevent lawsuits by staying accessible”).

    The Cost of Skipping Regular Web Accessibility Audits

    Many small to midsize businesses skip regular accessibility audits because of perceived costs or time commitments. But the truth is, not auditing can cost far more.

    Ignoring accessibility can lead to:

    • ADA lawsuits and expensive legal settlements
    • Court-ordered website remediation under tight (and expensive) deadlines
    • Loss of customers who can’t use your site
    • Negative publicity and damage to your brand’s reputation
    • Higher remediation costs later, compared to maintaining accessibility from the start

    Investing in regular audits and monitoring is like insurance for your website—and your business future.

    How 216digital Can Help You Stay Compliant

    At 216digital, we specialize in helping businesses of all sizes navigate the world of web accessibility with confidence. Our phased approach includes:

    • Risk Mitigation Audits: A focused first-pass audit to quickly catch and fix high-risk issues.
    • Real World Accessibility Audits: Deep manual testing with screen readers, keyboard-only navigation, and assistive technologies to find real-world barriers.
    • Ongoing Monitoring with a11y.Radar: Continuous scanning and reporting to help you maintain compliance and stay ahead of risks.

    We believe accessibility isn’t a one-time project—it’s an ongoing commitment. That’s why our services are designed to be flexible, scalable, and tailored to your business needs.

    Whether starting from scratch, redesigning your website, or needing help managing compliance over time, 216digital can help you build and maintain a site that works for everyone—and protects your business simultaneously.

    Keep Progress on Track with Confidence

     Accessibility is never truly finished—but that’s a good thing. It means you have an opportunity to keep improving, keep welcoming, and keep your business open to everyone. Staying compliant isn’t about chasing checklists—it’s about maintaining the trust you’ve already worked hard to earn.If you’re wondering whether now is the right time for your next audit, it probably is. A quick conversation can help clarify where you stand and what steps make sense next. Schedule a free ADA accessibility briefing with 216digital, and let’s keep your site moving forward—securely, inclusively, and confidently.

    Greg McNeil

    April 28, 2025
    Testing & Remediation
    Accessibility, Accessibility Audit, Accessibility testing, automated testing, manual audit, Manual Testing, Website Accessibility

  • What to Expect from an Accessibility Audit

    Running a business is no small feat. Between managing daily operations, keeping customers happy, and staying on top of your digital presence, it’s easy to overlook something like web accessibility. But in today’s world, where more users rely on assistive technology to browse online, accessibility is no longer optional—it’s essential.

    That’s where an accessibility audit comes in. It’s a smart, proactive step that helps you understand how well your website works for people with disabilities and where improvements are needed. It’s not just about avoiding legal trouble—it’s about creating a better experience for all your visitors.

    Let’s break it down so you know exactly what to expect.

    Why Accessibility Matters

    Reaching Every Visitor

    Web accessibility is about making sure everyone can use your website—no matter their ability. That includes people who rely on screen readers, keyboard navigation, or voice control, as well as those with visual, hearing, or cognitive challenges.

    A more accessible site leads to:

    • Better user experience
    • Improved search engine visibility
    • Increased customer trust

    It’s a win for your users and your business.

    Reducing Legal Risk

    ADA-related lawsuits over inaccessible websites are on the rise, and many target small to mid-sized businesses. In fact over 67% of lawsuits  in 2024 were targeting businesses with an annual revenue under $25 million or less. 

    These cases can be stressful and expensive—even if the issues weren’t intentional.

    A professional accessibility audit helps you spot and fix issues early, protecting your business while showing your commitment to inclusion.

    What Is an Accessibility Audit?

    An accessibility audit is a full review of your website to find any barriers that might stop people with disabilities from using it. These barriers could be anything from missing image descriptions to forms that don’t work with a screen reader.

    The audit is based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), which provide a clear set of standards for accessible web design. Following WCAG helps ensure your site meets legal requirements—and, more importantly, that it works for everyone.

    The Accessibility Audit Process: Step-by-Step

    Here’s what typically happens during a full accessibility audit:

    Initial Consultation & Scope Definition

    The process starts with a conversation. You and your audit team will review your website’s goals, user flows, and top-priority pages—like your homepage, checkout process, or contact form. This helps focus the audit on what matters most.

    Automated Testing

    Automated tools run quick scans to catch common issues like:

    • Missing alt text
    • Low color contrast
    • Improper heading order

    This is a great first step, but automated testing only catches part of the picture. That’s why manual checks are so important.

    Manual Evaluation

    Accessibility specialists then take a deeper look at your site. They’ll test things like:

    • Can users navigate with just a keyboard?
    • Are screen readers reading content in the correct order?
    • Do buttons and links have clear, accessible labels?

    Manual testing finds the issues that machines often miss—and ensures your site works for real people in real situations.

    User Testing with Assistive Technology

    In some cases, the team may bring in people who use assistive tools daily—like screen readers or alternative input devices—to test your site. Their feedback offers invaluable real-world insight that helps uncover problems no tool or developer could spot alone.

    Documentation of Findings

    Once testing is done, you’ll receive a report that includes:

    • A list of all issues
    • Where each problem exists
    • The specific WCAG criteria it violates
    • Visual examples and code references for clarity

    This report serves as your roadmap to fixing issues efficiently.

    Prioritization of Issues

    Not all issues are created equal. The audit team will help you prioritize based on the following:

    • How severe the issue is
    • How many users it might impact
    • Whether it poses a legal risk

    This lets you address the biggest barriers first and build a smart action plan moving forward.

    Remediation Recommendations

    Finally, you’ll receive clear, actionable guidance for fixing each issue. These recommendations will be tailored to your site’s platform, content, and team capacity. Some fixes might be quick, while others may take more planning—but you’ll know exactly what to do and where to start.

    What Happens After the Audit?

    Implementing Fixes

    After the accessibility audit, it’s time to put the findings to work. Your team—or a trusted partner like 216digital—can help implement those changes, making sure they align with best practices while preserving your brand’s design and functionality.

    Team Training

    To keep your site accessible over time, it helps to train the people who update it. That could mean a short session on how to use alt text or a checklist for adding new content. A little knowledge goes a long way in preventing future issues.

    Ongoing Monitoring

    Accessibility isn’t something you check off once and forget about. Websites are living things—they change, grow, and update over time. That means new accessibility issues can pop up without warning, especially as content is added or platforms evolve.

    That’s why regular monitoring is key. Running periodic scans, reviewing key pages, and staying alert to new barriers helps you maintain accessibility long after the initial audit. Tools like a11y.Radar, 216digital’s ongoing monitoring service, are designed to make this easier. It quietly keeps tabs on your site, flags issues early, and helps ensure your site stays in line with accessibility best practices—without the need for constant manual checks.

    Your Website’s Future Just Got Brighter

    A professional accessibility audit gives you more than just a report—it gives you peace of mind. It’s a smart, future-focused way to protect your business, improve your site, and welcome every visitor who comes your way.

    At 216digital, we specialize in helping small to mid-sized businesses make sense of accessibility. Our expert-led audits, clear documentation, and hands-on remediation support make the process easy to follow and effective to implement. We help you go beyond compliance—to a website that’s truly inclusive.

    If you’re ready to create a better experience for everyone and reduce your legal risk, let’s talk. A more accessible site isn’t just better for users—it’s better for business.

    Greg McNeil

    April 15, 2025
    Testing & Remediation
    Accessibility, Accessibility Audit, Accessibility testing, automated testing, manual audit, Web Accessibility, Website Accessibility

  • How 216digital Makes Accessibility Remediation Simple

    If you’re a small or mid-sized business owner, you’ve probably heard stories about other businesses getting hit with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) web accessibility lawsuits. Often, these lawsuits come out of nowhere, catching website owners by surprise. You might not even know what you did wrong, why your site was targeted, or how to fix it. It’s frustrating, and it’s scary. Even if you haven’t faced a lawsuit yet, you could be worried about your level of risk. Nobody wants a legal headache—especially not when you’re already juggling everything else that goes into running a business.

    Here at 216digital, our goal is to change the conversation around web accessibility. We help small to mid-sized businesses protect themselves from costly accessibility lawsuits while also making websites more inclusive for everyone. Instead of quick fixes that only look good on the surface, we focus on lasting solutions through real accessibility remediation. By partnering with us, you’re not just avoiding legal trouble—you’re also improving every visitor’s experience on your site. Good access equals good business.

    In this article, we’re going to break down what web accessibility actually means, how our services work, and why our people-focused approach sets us apart from companies that might rely on short-term, fear-based tactics. We’ll also show you how to schedule a free ADA briefing so you can gain clarity on your level of risk and figure out the next steps to make your site welcoming to all.

    What Is Web Accessibility, Really?

    Understanding the Basics

    The term “web accessibility” can feel intimidating if you haven’t delved into it before. But when you boil it down, it’s quite straightforward: web accessibility means designing and updating your website so that people with disabilities can use it just as smoothly as everyone else. This includes visitors who use screen readers, rely on keyboard navigation, need larger text, or have other accessibility requirements.

    Accessibility Helps Everyone

    Making a site more accessible often has bonus benefits for everyone. For example, clearer website structure can improve your overall user experience, boost your SEO (search engine optimization), and make your site more user-friendly across different devices. In other words, meeting accessibility standards isn’t just about legal risk—it’s also about creating a smoother experience for all your visitors. That’s why accessibility remediation is such a critical part of a business’s digital strategy.

    The Problem: Why Lawsuits Are Happening

    Why the Legal Risk Is Growing

    Over the past few years, courts have increasingly treated websites as “places of public accommodation,” meaning they fall under rules that require them to be accessible to people with disabilities. This has led to a spike in legal actions against businesses—some well-intentioned (from people who genuinely can’t access certain sites) and others more opportunistic, aiming to force quick settlements.

    Proactive Prevention with Remediation

    Either way, if your website has accessibility barriers, you could end up with a lawsuit or a demand letter. That often means paying lawyer fees, making sudden updates to your site under intense time pressure, and dealing with stress you never saw coming.

    At 216digital, our approach is all about preventing these problems before they happen. Through comprehensive accessibility remediation, we don’t want you to face that unexpected expense or crisis moment. Instead, we want to set you up for success by making sure your site meets recognized accessibility standards in a thorough, sustainable way.

    How 216digital Helps You Meet Accessibility Standards

    1. Risk-First Approach: Stop Lawsuits Before They Start

    When you bring us on board, we don’t just run a quick scan of your site and hand you a list of potential problems. A quick list is a start, but it doesn’t actually fix anything. Instead, we take a risk-first approach. We identify the areas of your site most likely to trigger a lawsuit and tackle them right away. This rapid response significantly reduces your potential exposure.

    From there, we proceed through the rest of your site, ensuring all content and functions align with trusted accessibility standards. That way, you’re not left vulnerable to new complaints popping up in the future. That’s the difference between surface-level adjustments and meaningful accessibility remediation.

    2. Full WCAG Implementation (The Gold Standard for Accessibility)

    If you’ve done even a little reading on accessibility, you’ve likely seen mention of WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines). Judges, lawyers, and advocacy groups generally refer to WCAG 2.1 for determining whether a site is accessible. These guidelines cover areas like color contrast, text size, navigation, labels, and much more—essentially the nuts and bolts of a properly accessible website.

    At 216digital, we don’t guess at what might be acceptable; we follow a systematic process to ensure your site aligns with WCAG 2.1 AA standards. We conduct thorough manual reviews along with automated checks to verify real-world accessibility, not just box-ticking. Our team’s hands-on accessibility remediation work results in a site that is recognized as accessible by the broader web community.

    3. Ongoing Monitoring with a11y.Radar

    A frequent misconception is that fixing accessibility barriers is a one-time job. In reality, websites are ever-evolving. You add new pages, adjust your site design, or change your content management system. Each of these updates can unintentionally introduce fresh barriers or break fixes you’ve made in the past.

    That’s why we built a11y.Radar. It’s our specialized monitoring tool that consistently keeps an eye on your site, even after you’ve addressed the initial round of accessibility issues. a11y.Radar periodically checks if new problems have cropped up or if previously fixed areas have broken. With this in place, your accessibility remediation efforts stay intact, and you can relax, knowing you’re not being blindsided by hidden hurdles.

    4. Hands-On Guidance and Support

    Technical expertise is crucial, but we believe that easy-to-understand communication is just as important. Our team provides one-on-one support and guidance, answering questions you have about accessibility guidelines, legal implications, and the practical steps to ensure your site meets the right standards.

    • Plain-Language Explanations: We won’t drown you in legal or tech jargon.
    • Training Resources: If your developers or content team need training to maintain accessibility remediation practices, we’re happy to help.
    • Personalized Assistance: Every website is different, so we don’t force you into a cookie-cutter solution.

    We want you to feel confident about your site’s accessibility, not left in the dark about what’s happening behind the scenes.

    Why We’re Different from Other Accessibility Companies

    We’re Not Selling Fear—We’re Solving a Real Problem

    Let’s be honest: lawsuits are a genuine risk, and the ADA is taken seriously in court. But 216digital’s mission is to educate you, not terrify you. We want to give you a clear understanding of what’s at stake and how you can proactively protect your business. Scare tactics aren’t our style. Instead, we rely on proven, professional accessibility remediation to resolve real issues.

    No Overlays, No Shortcuts

    Some companies push accessibility “overlays” that claim to magically solve every potential issue. While these might address a few surface-level features (like text resizing or color contrast toggles), they rarely fix deeper code-level or structural issues—and sometimes even introduce new difficulties.

    At 216digital, our philosophy is to fix your site at the source. We go into the code and address each issue thoroughly. Yes, it’s more work. But the results are genuine and reflect real progress that stands the test of time. That’s the power of full-scale accessibility remediation.

    We’re a Small Team That Cares

    We’ve been around for more than 25 years. In that time, we’ve supported hundreds of businesses across industries, from e-commerce shops to local service providers. We know what it’s like to run a small or medium-sized business, and we treat your goals and concerns with respect. We’re also proud to say we’re a tight-knit crew. When you call us, you’ll speak to real people who care about your success—and who care deeply about getting your accessibility remediation right.

    Ready to Talk? Let’s Schedule Your ADA Briefing

    Worried your website might have accessibility barriers? Not sure if you’re at risk for a lawsuit? We offer a free ADA briefing to help you figure out your next move. It’s a no-pressure conversation where you’ll learn what’s really happening on your site and how we can help.

    • Site Assessment: We take a basic look at your site to spot any glaring red flags.
    • Risk Overview: We talk about possible risks that could leave you open to legal action.
    • Options & Timeline: We lay out what solutions might look like, with a sense of how long and how much effort they might take.

    We’re not here to push a sales pitch—just to share our expertise and help you make the best decision. If you decide to work with us, awesome! If not, at least you’ll walk away with a clear understanding of your situation and how to move forward.


    If you’re ready to stop wondering about your site’s accessibility status and start taking proactive steps, reach out to schedule your free ADA briefing. We’ll explain everything you need to know in a straightforward, understandable way. Fill out our contact form below  or schedule online today at 216digital.com/ada-briefing. We can’t wait to hear from you and show you how simple real accessibility remediation can be.

    Greg McNeil

    April 7, 2025
    Testing & Remediation
    Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, Accessibility testing, automated testing, Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Remediation, Website Accessibility

  • How Automated Scans Help (and Fail) Accessibility

    Have you ever clicked on a website and immediately gotten lost because nothing seemed to work the way you expected? Maybe you couldn’t find the right button, or the page layout was all over the place. Now imagine facing those same frustrations but with the added challenge of a visual, auditory, or motor disability. Navigating the web shouldn’t feel like an obstacle course—it should be intuitive and inclusive for everyone.

    If you’re a website owner or business owner in the United States, you might already know that accessibility is becoming more than just a nice-to-have. It’s a key part of good customer service, protects you from legal risks, and, quite simply, it’s the right thing to do. But where do you start?

    One of the first steps many people take is running automated scans.

    These scans promise a quick way to spot accessibility issues on your site. Yet, while they can be extremely helpful, they’re far from perfect. In this article, we’ll explore the ups and downs of automated scans—what they can do, where they fail, and how to blend them into a solid strategy that also includes manual testing and expert help.

    What Are Automated Accessibility Scans?

    Automated scans are software tools that crawl through your website’s code, looking for red flags based on standards like the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)). Think of these tools like the spellcheck in your word processor: they can spot a lot of mistakes, but they can’t always tell you if you’re using the right words in the right context.

    What Do Automated Scans Detect?

    Plenty of free and paid tools exist. Some are browser extensions (like WAVE or Google’s Lighthouse), while others are built-in services that run regular checks on your website. They’re great at picking up on common coding issues such as:

    • Missing or poorly written alternative text on images
    • Low color contrast between text and background
    • Improper heading levels (skipping from an H1 to an H3 without an H2, for example)
    • Misapplied ARIA attributes
    • Certain missing form labels

    If your site has glaring accessibility mistakes, automated scans can flag those quickly. They’ll often give you a handy list of what’s wrong, along with references to WCAG guidelines or best practices on how to fix each issue. That’s a huge benefit if you’re new to accessibility and need a push in the right direction.

    How Automated Scans Can Help You

    Let’s look at some of the biggest advantages of automated scans—and how they fit into your overall web development workflow.

    Speed and Efficiency

    Manual reviews take time, especially for large websites. An automated tool, on the other hand, can process hundreds or even thousands of pages in a shorter timeframe. This is especially handy if you regularly add or change content.

    Spotting the “No-Brainers”

    Many accessibility issues are straightforward coding mistakes—like forgetting to add “alt” text to images. Automated scanners are perfect for picking up on these. They’re quick, consistent, and thorough in locating these common errors.

    Routine Monitoring

    Some automated scan tools offer scheduled checks, which is terrific for ongoing maintenance. You can set them to run weekly or monthly scans and then get alerts if something new pops up, letting you address problems before they spiral.

    Raising Awareness

    For those brand-new to digital accessibility, automated tools can serve as a mini crash course. They highlight rules like ensuring sufficient color contrast or labeling form fields properly, helping you learn accessibility basics as you go.

    Ease of Use

    Many automated scanners come with user-friendly dashboards or plugins. You don’t have to be a coding genius to interpret most of the results. Often, the tool itself provides guidance on how to fix whatever it finds.

    The Real-World Limitations of Automated Scans

    As powerful as they are, automated scans also have notable blind spots (no pun intended). If you rely solely on these tools, you could end up with a site that technically passes certain checks but still feels like a maze for users with disabilities.

    Lack of Context

    A scanner can confirm if there’s alt text on an image, but it can’t determine if that text is accurate or helpful. An automated report might be happy to see you labeled your button as “Button,” but that label doesn’t tell a user what the button actually does.

    Missing Nuances

    Some accessibility aspects aren’t purely code-based; they’re about user experience and clarity. For example, is your site’s language too complicated for people with cognitive disabilities? Or is the layout tricky for those navigating with a screen reader? Automated tools struggle with these questions because they can’t judge user-friendliness the same way a person can.

    False Flags

    It’s common to get false positives (where the tool flags a problem that might not actually be a problem) or false negatives (where the tool fails to spot a genuine issue). This can lead you down the wrong path or lull you into thinking your site is perfectly fine when it’s not.

    Limited Scenarios

    Accessibility is more than code. What happens when someone uses only a keyboard to navigate your site? Or how does your site work for someone who relies on voice commands or a screen reader? Automated scans can’t replicate all these scenarios.

    Overconfidence and the Need for Manual Testing

    Automated tools can create a false sense of security. Just because a scanner says you’re 90% accessible doesn’t mean your site is truly welcoming for all. This is where manual testing comes in.

    Beyond the Scan: Why Manual Testing Still Rules

    Manual testing is where you or a tester interacts with your site in a more human way. Yes, it’s more time-intensive, but it’s also where you’ll uncover issues an automated tool can’t detect.

    Keyboard-Only Navigation

    One of the most fundamental manual tests is trying to tab through your site without using a mouse. If you can’t reach a menu item or submit a form using only the keyboard, that’s a major red flag.

    Screen Reader Assessments

    Automated scans might say you have alt text in all the right places, but only a real screen reader test will tell you if that text makes sense in context. Does it describe important images properly? Does the reading order make sense, or does it jump around the page?

    Real Users, Real Feedback

    Inviting people with various disabilities to use your site can reveal issues you never even knew existed. Maybe certain wording is confusing, or a CAPTCHA system is impossible to complete using assistive technology. Nothing beats firsthand feedback.

    Manual testing fills the gaps that scanners leave behind, ensuring your site isn’t just “passing a test” but actually creating a positive experience. While it can require more resources (time and possibly hiring outside help), the results are worth it.

    Keeping Accessibility an Ongoing Priority

    Accessibility isn’t something you do once and forget about. Think of your website as a living, breathing entity: you add content, tweak layouts, and launch new features over time. Each change could introduce fresh accessibility challenges.

    So, how exactly do automated scans fit into a more complete approach to accessibility?

    Putting It All Together: A Holistic Accessibility Game Plan

    1. Start with an Automated Scan – Run a scan and fix low-hanging fruit, such as missing alt text and color contrast problems.
    2. Add Manual Checks – Navigate your site using only a keyboard and a screen reader. Identify areas that feel confusing or broken.
    3. Get Professional Input – If your site is critical to your business, hire an accessibility specialist for a thorough audit.
    4. Keep It Going – Schedule periodic scans, manual audits, and staff training. Accessibility should be part of your workflow.
    5. Stay Informed – Follow updates to WCAG and relevant U.S. laws, and continue learning from accessibility experts.

    The Best of Both Worlds: Automated and Manual Testing

    Achieving true web accessibility requires more than just running a quick scan—it demands a balanced approach that combines the speed of automation with the insight of manual testing. Automated tools can help identify glaring issues, but only real human interaction can ensure a seamless experience for all users. By integrating both strategies, you’re not just checking a compliance box—you’re creating a more inclusive, user-friendly web presence that benefits everyone.

    Start your journey toward full web accessibility today—reach out to 216digital using the form below! Our team of accessibility experts is ready to assess your site and provide tailored solutions to ensure that all visitors can easily access your content. Don’t let accessibility remain an afterthought—take the first step towards a more inclusive online presence now.

    Greg McNeil

    February 13, 2025
    Testing & Remediation
    Accessibility Audit, Accessibility testing, automated testing, manual audit, Manual Testing, Web Accessibility

  • The Accessibility Lawsuit Trend No One’s Talking About

    In 2025, the world of digital accessibility is more complicated and urgent than ever. Lawsuits over website accessibility are on the rise, and they are changing in ways many businesses haven’t prepared for. In the past, companies would run automated scans and assume they were safe. But a troubling new trend has emerged. Plaintiffs are now basing their legal cases on problems that only show up through manual audits. If your website is relying on automated checks alone, you could be at serious legal risk. This article explains why this shift is happening, how automated scans fall short, and what you can do right now to stay ahead.

    Why Automated Scans Are No Longer Enough

    Over the years, many accessibility lawsuits pointed to errors found by automated tools. These tools check for missing alt text on images, low color contrast, and other basic issues. But today, plaintiffs’ lawyers and accessibility consultants are using manual audits to find deeper barriers. They test how a site really works for someone with a disability. They check if a keyboard-only user can reach all parts of a form, or if a screen reader can make sense of the menu. These tests go beyond surface-level coding problems.

    Now, many businesses find themselves sued even though they passed automated scans. Plaintiffs’ experts show detailed reports from manual audits to prove real-life barriers. Lawyers and judges are giving more weight to these reports, which show that a site may look fine to the naked eye but still fail to support people with disabilities. If businesses don’t adjust, they could face serious legal costs and brand damage.

    The Problem with Automated Scans

    Automated scans still have their place. They’re great for catching low-hanging fruit like missing alt attributes or basic color contrast issues. However, they’re just one piece of the accessibility puzzle. Here are a few examples:

    Contextual Understanding

    Tools can’t interpret how a page flows from one element to another or whether a user’s journey makes sense. For instance, an automated tool might confirm that a button has a label. But it won’t confirm if that label makes sense in context—for example, “Click Here” might be flagged as accessible by an automated tool but provides zero context to screen readers.

    Dynamic Interactive Elements

    If your site has pop-ups, carousels, or complex menus, automated scans might not catch when these elements create focus issues. A user relying on keyboard navigation might get stuck or lose track of where they are on the page.

    Human Navigation Patterns

    Real users might try multiple paths to accomplish tasks, like making a purchase or filling out a form. Automated tools generally test code in a linear fashion, missing real-world usage patterns.

    Advanced ARIA Techniques

    ARIA can help screen readers identify custom elements (like drop-downs, tabs, or modals). However, it must be implemented correctly. An automated tool might only check if ARIA attributes exist, not if they are used correctly.

    Recent Case Examples Where Automated Scans Failed

    Several businesses have learned this lesson the hard way. Although you might read about them in publications like The Wall Street Journal, three notable examples include:

    Kramer Knives

    A small business specializing in handcrafted knives faced a lawsuit from a visually impaired plaintiff. Kramer Knives believed they were compliant because an automated scan showed few errors. However, manual testing uncovered keyboard navigation issues and unclear labels, resulting in legal action.

    Electric Bike Technologies

    This e-commerce business was sued for alleged inaccessibility after a plaintiff discovered barriers during manual testing. The automated scans the company had relied on were insufficient, as they didn’t catch certain interactive elements that weren’t accessible to screen readers.

    Extract Labs

    This CBD and cannabinoid products seller thought their high automated score meant they were safe. However, manual audits found significant barriers—like form fields that weren’t properly labeled and pop-up modals that trapped keyboard focus—leading to a lawsuit.

    In each instance, the businesses thought they were protected. But what they missed—those deeper, functional issues—still made their sites inaccessible to real users and vulnerable in court.

    How This Shift Could Activate a Wave of Accessibility Lawsuits in 2025

    More Lawsuits, More Targets

    Since manual audits reveal issues that automated scans ignore, it’s easier than ever for plaintiffs to build a strong legal case. E-commerce stores, healthcare websites, and travel booking sites are especially vulnerable. Their complex forms and interactive features may pass an automated check but fail real-world testing.

    The Rise of Copycat Lawsuits

    Accessibility lawsuits now follow a pattern. According to recent statistics, 41% of federal court lawsuits in 2024 targeted businesses that had already been sued before. Plaintiffs’ law firms reuse winning strategies again and again. Once they find a successful argument, they apply it to many businesses across different industries. Small businesses without in-house accessibility knowledge become prime targets. They often settle quickly to avoid higher legal costs, which makes them even more attractive to plaintiffs. These copycat lawsuits can destroy a business’s reputation and finances.

    What Website Owners Need to Do Now

    Going Beyond Automated Scans

    It’s clear that if your only strategy is running an automated scan, you’re leaving yourself wide open. You need a multi-layered approach that combines automated scanning with manual audits for a complete look at your site. Manual audits test your website in the same way real users do. 

    Testers try to navigate using only a keyboard, or with a screen reader, or with special settings to assist low vision. This approach catches hidden barriers that an automated check will never see. If possible, individuals with disabilities should be involved in testing. Their feedback is invaluable because it reflects real-world challenges that neither a tool nor a developer might anticipate.

    Creating a Proactive Accessibility Strategy

    If you want to stay off a plaintiff’s radar, or at least have a strong defense if sued, take these steps:

    Conduct a Full Accessibility Audit

    Start with an initial assessment that combines automated tools and manual audits. Identify all major barriers to accessibility on your site.

    Remediate the Issues

    Fix the problems uncovered by your audit. This might involve updating code, redesigning certain elements for better contrast and clarity, or rethinking how your site’s navigation is structured.

    Implement Ongoing Monitoring

    Accessibility isn’t a “set it and forget it” project. Every time you add a new product, page, or feature, you could introduce new barriers. Schedule periodic reviews, both automated and manual or sign up for monitoring services like Accessibility Radar (a11y.Radar).

    Train Your Team

    Developers, designers, content writers—everyone on your team should know the basics of accessibility. Make sure they understand how to write alt text, use headings properly, and maintain keyboard-friendly navigation.

    How 216digital Can Help

    If you’re feeling overwhelmed, you’re not alone. It’s a big task to ensure your website is fully accessible, especially if you’re new to web accessibility. At 216digital, we focus on making accessibility practical and achievable for businesses of all sizes.

    Our experts will test your website the way actual users do. We don’t just point out problems. We help you fix them for the long run. Whether your site needs design tweaks, code adjustments, or content changes, we’ll guide you every step of the way.

    We don’t stop there. Accessibility standards change, and we stay on top of new guidelines. We provide ongoing support to make sure your site remains accessible. By combining automated scans with manual audits, our team delivers a full view of your accessibility status.

    Take Action Today

    Many business owners don’t think about website accessibility until they get served a lawsuit. By then, it may be too late. The better plan is to act now. Start with a thorough assessment and fix any barriers before a plaintiff turns them into a legal case. If you wait, you could face serious penalties, legal fees, and harm to your brand.

    To stay protected, schedule a free accessibility risk assessment with 216digital. Our team will show you how manual audits can spot hidden barriers, and we’ll guide you on how to fix them. Avoid the growing wave of lawsuits by making your site accessible today. After all, equal access is not just a legal issue—it’s the right thing to do for your customers and your business.

    Remember: automated scans are no longer enough. By embracing manual audits, you can protect your business, serve your customers better, and stay on the right side of the law. Don’t wait until you become the next lawsuit headline. Act now and secure your place as a leader in digital accessibility.

    Greg McNeil

    February 5, 2025
    Legal Compliance
    2025, Accessibility, Accessibility Audit, Accessibility testing, ADA Lawsuit, manual audit, Manual Testing, Web Accessibility
1 2 3
Next Page
216digital Scanning Tool

Audit Your Website for Free

Find Out if Your Website is WCAG & ADA Compliant













    216digital Logo

    Our team is full of expert professionals in Web Accessibility Remediation, eCommerce Design & Development, and Marketing – ready to help you reach your goals and thrive in a competitive marketplace. 

    216 Digital, Inc. BBB Business Review

    Get in Touch

    2208 E Enterprise Pkwy
    Twinsburg, OH 44087
    216.505.4400
    info@216digital.com

    Support

    Support Desk
    Acceptable Use Policy
    Accessibility Policy
    Privacy Policy

    Web Accessibility

    Settlement & Risk Mitigation
    WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA Compliance
    Monitoring Service by a11y.Radar

    Development & Marketing

    eCommerce Development
    PPC Marketing
    Professional SEO

    About

    About Us
    Contact

    Copyright 2024 216digital. All Rights Reserved.