216digital.
Web Accessibility

ADA Risk Mitigation
Prevent and Respond to ADA Lawsuits


WCAG & Section 508
Conform with Local and International Requirements


a11y.Radar
Ongoing Monitoring and Maintenance


Consultation & Training

Is Your Website Vulnerable to Frivolous Lawsuits?
Get a Free Web Accessibility Audit to Learn Where You Stand
Find Out Today!

Web Design & Development

Marketing

PPC Management
Google & Social Media Ads


Professional SEO
Increase Organic Search Strength

Interested in Marketing?
Speak to an Expert about marketing opportunities for your brand to cultivate support and growth online.
Contact Us

About

Blog

Contact Us
  • UX in Mind: Your Simple Guide to Accessible Design

    The success of any website or app really boils down to one thing: how it feels to use. If people can navigate your site easily, find what they’re looking for, and get things done without frustration, they’re far more likely to stick around—and come back. But when the experience is confusing, clunky, or leaves some users behind? That’s when you lose them.

    At its core, good UX design is about making sure everyone can use your product—regardless of ability, device, or familiarity. The best experiences don’t just work for some; they work for all.

    We’ve put together a practical checklist to help you design with accessibility in mind—covering visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive needs. And we’ll point you toward helpful tools and resources so you can keep learning, keep improving, and keep building digital experiences that truly welcome everyone.

    The Fundamentals of Accessible UX

    Accessibility is about designing for how people actually live and interact—not just for some perfect, idealized user. It’s about making space for the full range of human experiences, because that’s who’s showing up at your digital doorstep. And when you zoom out, the impact becomes clear: over 16% of the world’s population lives with a significant disability. When you keep that in mind from the start, the end result isn’t just more inclusive—it’s better for everyone.

    And yes, the benefits are very real:

    • You’ll reach more people
    • Build stronger trust with your audience
    • Lower your legal risks
    • And create a smoother, more enjoyable experience across the board

    But to get there, it helps to understand how accessibility and usability work together.

    Accessibility vs. Usability

    Accessibility and usability go hand in hand, but they aren’t quite the same thing. Accessibility means people can use your site—regardless of ability. Usability means they want to. It’s the difference between building a ramp and making sure the door is easy to open once you get there. When both are in place, you’re not just meeting a requirement—you’re delivering a great experience.

    So how do you do that in practice?

    In the sections ahead, we’ll walk through four key areas to focus on: visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive accessibility. Each one connects to the WCAG POUR principles—Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust—which are all about making digital content work well for as many people as possible, in as many ways as possible.

    Visual Accessibility: Making Your Content Clear

    When it comes to digital experiences, what people see—and how clearly they see it—matters. Strong accessible design means your content shows up well for everyone, no matter their vision or viewing environment. Whether someone’s using a screen reader, navigating with magnification tools, or just scrolling on their phone in the sun, your design choices can make a big difference.

    Color and Contrast: Give Every Element a Voice

    Color does a lot of heavy lifting in design, but it shouldn’t have to carry meaning on its own. Good contrast helps your content stand out and stay legible in all kinds of settings—from dark rooms to bright sidewalks. Use tools like WebAIM Contrast Checker to spot trouble areas before your users do.

    Instead of just using red to show an error, pair it with an icon and a message that says what’s going on. That way, everyone—regardless of how they see color—gets the same info. And skip putting important text over photos or gradients. It might look nice, but it often makes things harder to read.

    Try this: View your layout in grayscale. Can you still tell what’s what? If not, it’s time for a few tweaks.

    Text and Typography: Keep It Clean and Comfortable

    Fonts don’t just carry words—they carry the experience. Stick with simple, sans-serif fonts like Arial, Helvetica, or Open Sans. They’re easier to read and less likely to cause eye strain. Avoid fancy decorative fonts for body copy, and go with a minimum of 16px for body text. Line height should feel breathable—somewhere around 1.4 to 1.6x the font size—so your words don’t feel cramped.

    And remember, people should be able to zoom in up to 200% without a loss of content. That’s not just a nice-to-have—it’s part of WCAG’s requirements.

    Quick test: Zoom way in and try navigating with just a keyboard. Everything should still be readable, usable, and scroll in one direction.

    Images and Media: Describe What Matters

    Images aren’t just decoration—they carry meaning, emotion, and context. But that only works if everyone gets to experience them. That’s where alt text comes in. For each image, ask yourself: What is this doing here?

    If it’s decorative, mark it with empty alt text (alt=""). If it’s showing something important—like a process, a chart, or an instruction—give it a short, clear description. And for complex visuals? Offer a more detailed breakdown nearby or link out to a longer description.

    Heads up: Avoid embedding key text inside images. If you have to, make sure that the same info is also available as live text on the page.

    Links and Structure: Build a Clear Path

    “Click here” doesn’t cut it anymore. Link text should be clear and specific—like “Download the full pricing guide” or “View shipping options.” This gives screen reader users meaningful context and helps anyone scanning your page understand exactly where a link will take them.

    But clarity isn’t just about links—it’s about how the entire page is structured.

    Use semantic headings (H1 to H6) to create a strong, logical outline. That helps screen reader users and keyboard navigators alike. And if you want to go a step further, use ARIA landmarks (like role= "main" or role= "navigation") to give even more structure to your layout.

    Try this: Tab through your site or listen to it with a screen reader. If the page sounds confusing out loud, it probably reads that way too.

    Auditory Accessibility: Sound That Speaks to Everyone

    Audio can bring depth to your content—but only if it’s accessible. Make sure all multimedia includes captions or transcripts. This isn’t just about supporting users who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing—it’s about meeting people where they are: whether they’re in a crowded café, a quiet office, or scrolling with the sound off.

    Captions should be accurate, well-timed, and include important background sounds like [music] or [laughter] when they add meaning. Bonus points if you also let users control playback speed, jump to specific moments, or pause when needed.

    Skip the surprise: Don’t autoplay audio or video. And if it starts automatically, make sure there’s an easy-to-find pause or mute button.

    If your design relies on voice commands, always offer another way to engage—like buttons, text input, or keyboard shortcuts. Voice should be an option, not a barrier.

    Motor Accessibility: Let Everyone Navigate Their Way

    Not everyone uses a mouse. For some users, navigating your site with a keyboard—or assistive tools like switch controls—is their primary method. That’s why motor accessibility is so important.

    Your site should be fully usable with just a keyboard. That means:

    • A logical tab order that follows the flow of the page
    • Visible focus styles that clearly show where the user is
    • Accessible modals that keep focus inside until they’re closed
    • A skip link to let users jump past repeated content

    Touch targets need to be big enough—at least 44px by 44px—and spaced well so people don’t hit the wrong button by accident. And don’t rely on hover-only tooltips. Make sure the same info shows up when elements get keyboard focus or a tap.

    Test it out: Try using your site with only the keyboard. You’ll quickly spot any dead ends or frustrating traps.

    Cognitive Accessibility: Make It Clear, Make It Work

    Cognitive accessibility is about reducing mental strain. It’s for users who may be neurodivergent, have memory or learning differences, or just want a simpler, calmer experience (which, honestly, is all of us sometimes).

    Consistency is key. Stick with familiar UI patterns and avoid switching up layouts too often. Too many options on one page? That can be overwhelming. Break things down. Keep it focused.

    Tips that go a long way:

    • Use plain, conversational language
    • Break content into bite-size chunks
    • Add helper text or examples near form fields
    • Use bullet points and clear headers to help users scan

    Avoid flashy carousels, blinking elements, or countdown timers that can’t be paused. If a timer is necessary—say for a session timeout—give users a heads-up and a way to extend their time.

    Pro move: Offer a simplified or “reading mode” view for content-heavy pages. It can make a big difference in comprehension and comfort. These types of accessible design choices often benefit all users, not just those with cognitive disabilities.

    Accessible Design Checklist

    Keep this quick-reference checklist close at hand:

    ▪ Strong color contrast (4.5:1 minimum)

    ▪ No reliance on color alone for important information

    ▪ Legible, scalable fonts and adequate spacing

    ▪ Descriptive alt text for images

    ▪ Clear, descriptive link text

    ▪ Proper heading structure (H1–H6)

    ▪ Keyboard navigable with logical tab order

    ▪ Captions and transcripts for all multimedia

    ▪ Accessible media playback controls

    ▪ Large, spaced interactive elements

    ▪ Consistent layout and navigation

    ▪ Plain language instructions

    ▪ Flexible time limits for tasks and forms

    Accessible Design Never Clocks Out

    You’re already doing the work—asking better questions, designing more thoughtfully, and looking at your site through more than one lens. That’s what leads to lasting change.

    There’s no final destination when it comes to accessible design. But every shift in your design process—every adjustment, every decision made with someone else’s experience in mind—moves the web in the right direction.

    And if you ever want backup or a fresh set of eyes, 216digital is here to help. We offer accessibility briefings to give you clarity, confidence, and a plan to move forward.

    Greg McNeil

    July 24, 2025
    How-to Guides
    Accessibility, Accessible Design, Graphic Designer, How-to, inclusive desgin, UX, WCAG, Web Accessibility, Web Accessible Design
  • What States Have Their Own Accessibility Laws?

    It’s one thing to know that digital accessibility matters. It’s another to figure out which accessibility laws actually apply to your business—and that’s where things start to get murky. Some states follow the federal lead. Others have their own rules, timelines, and expectations. A few have no official laws at all but are still seeing lawsuits.

    It’s not always clear where the lines are. And if you’re trying to do things right—without getting blindsided later—it helps to know what’s happening in your state, not just in theory.

    Here’s what’s really going on across the country, one state at a time.

    The Federal Foundation for Digital Accessibility

    Before we get into what each state is doing, let’s take a quick look at the bigger picture. At the federal level, two key laws shape how we approach digital accessibility: the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. These set the baseline—and everything else tends to build from there.

    Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

    The ADA has been around since 1990, created to prevent discrimination against people with disabilities in all areas of public life. While the law doesn’t specifically mention “websites” or “apps,” courts have increasingly interpreted digital platforms to fall under its scope—especially when tied to public services or businesses that serve the public.

    Titles II and III of the ADA

    • Title II applies to state and local governments. It requires their websites and digital services—like online forms, schedules, and service portals—to be accessible to people with disabilities.
    • Title III covers private businesses and nonprofits, from retailers and restaurants to healthcare providers. If you’re offering goods, services, or information online, accessibility isn’t optional—it’s expected.

    Although the ADA doesn’t lay out specific technical standards, most lawsuits point to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as the benchmark. Ultimately, ADA compliance is about more than avoiding a lawsuit—it’s about making sure everyone, regardless of ability, can fully participate in today’s digital world.

    Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act

    Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act plays a major role in shaping digital accessibility across federal agencies. Originally passed in 1973 and expanded in 1998, it requires that all federal electronic and information technology (EIT) be usable by people with disabilities. That includes everything from websites and software to internal systems and public documents.

    But its impact goes beyond government offices. If you’re a contractor or vendor working with federal agencies, you’re expected to follow these same standards. That has made Section 508 a powerful driver of accessible design across both public and private sectors.

    Together, Section 508 and the ADA form the foundation for digital accessibility compliance across the country. But depending on where you operate, state-specific laws may also come into play.

    States with Their Own Accessibility Laws

    While every state must comply with the ADA and Section 508 over 30 states have adopted digital accessibility requirements beyond the federal baseline.

    Alaska

    Alaska does not currently have its own state-specific digital accessibility laws. However, the state government maintains a State of Alaska ADA Compliance Program and voluntarily adheres to WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards for its own digital services. This means that while there are no separate legal mandates in place, Alaska’s agencies are actively working to ensure their websites and online content are accessible to individuals with disabilities.

    Arizona

    Arizona has incorporated digital accessibility into its statewide IT policy. The state’s accessibility policy requires all government agencies and entities receiving state funding—except certain universities—to follow clear accessibility guidelines. These standards are designed to ensure that public-facing digital content is usable by people with disabilities and aligned with current best practices, including WCAG principles.

    Arkansas

    Arkansas has its own digital accessibility law known as Act 1227 of 1999. This legislation requires that all state government agencies and entities receiving state funding ensure their websites are accessible—particularly to individuals who are blind or visually impaired. While the law predates modern WCAG guidelines, it underscores the state’s early commitment to creating digital spaces that serve all users equally.

    California

    California has some of the most comprehensive digital accessibility laws in the country, reflecting the state’s broader commitment to civil rights and inclusive technology. Key statutes include:

    • Government Code Section 11545.7: Requires every state agency to post a certification of compliance with digital accessibility standards on their website every two years. Sites must meet the requirements of Sections 7405 and 11135 and align with WCAG 2.0 Level AA.
    • Government Code Section 7405: Reinforces Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and mandates that state agencies ensure their electronic and information technology is accessible.
    • Unruh Civil Rights Act: Prohibits businesses from discriminating based on disability, including through their digital services. The law applies even to out-of-state companies selling products or services to Californians. Violators can face minimum fines of $4,000 per offense.
    • Government Code Section 11135: Similar to the Unruh Act, but focused on state-run or state-funded programs. It bars discrimination in any activity or program operated by or receiving financial support from the state.

    Taken together, these laws make California one of the most proactive states when it comes to digital inclusion—and a state where accessibility compliance is not just encouraged, but enforceable.

    Colorado

    Colorado is one of the most recent states to pass ts digital accessibility laws with House Bill 21-1110, also known as the Colorado Laws for Persons with Disabilities. Effective July 1, 2024, this legislation builds on federal requirements by mandating that all digital content from state agencies and public higher education institutions be accessible to individuals with disabilities. The law also ensures that no person with a disability is excluded from any service, program, or activity offered by a public entity or state agency.

    Connecticut

    Connecticut requires all state agencies to follow a Universal Website Accessibility Policy. This policy mandates conformance with WCAG 1.0 Level A and includes a Checklist of Design Requirements to help agencies meet usability and accessibility expectations. While the standards are dated, they represent an early commitment to digital inclusion.

    Delaware

    Delaware has a state Digital Accessibility Policy that requires all public-facing digital content to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards. This ensures that state websites and services are usable by individuals with disabilities.

    Georgia

    Georgia requires all state-managed digital content to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA. This ensures that websites and services from state agencies are accessible and usable for people with disabilities.

    Idaho

    Idaho provides Web Publishing Guidelines that outline IT and telecom standards for state agencies, along with templates and accessibility best practices to help make digital content more inclusive and user-friendly.

    Illinois

    Illinois adheres to the Illinois Information Technology Accessibility Act (IITAA), requiring all state agencies and public universities to ensure their websites and IT systems are accessible to individuals with disabilities. The act outlines clear technical standards and encourages forward-thinking digital inclusion efforts.

    Indiana

    Indiana enforces Indiana Code 4-13.1-3, which supports Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. This law mandates that all digital services—including websites, applications, IT systems, and digital documents—managed by the state must be accessible to people with disabilities.

    Iowa

    Iowa follows a Website Accessibility Standard that requires all state agencies and publicly funded contractors to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA. This ensures digital content and services align with accessibility best practices.

    Kansas

    Kansas implements digital accessibility through its Information Technology Executive Council (ITEC) Policy, which sets accessibility requirements for all state agencies and contractors handling digital assets.

    Louisiana

    The Louisiana Office of Technology Services (OTS) has adopted WCAG 2.1 as the baseline accessibility standard for all state-managed digital content, ensuring compliance with current accessibility guidelines.

    Maine

    Maine’s Digital Accessibility and Usability Policy requires all state-produced digital content and services to meet accessibility standards. Vendors must comply with WCAG 2.0 Level AA, with oversight and support provided by the Information Technology Accessibility Committee and the Maine IT Accessibility Team.

    Maryland

    Maryland enforces the Maryland Information Technology Nonvisual Access (MD IT NVA) Regulatory Standards, which require all new or upgraded IT systems within the state government to be fully accessible for nonvisual users.

    Massachusetts

    The Enterprise Information Technology Accessibility Policy in Massachusetts mandates that all applicable digital assets, including software, websites, and reports, meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Compliance is required for all executive branch agencies.

    Michigan

    Michigan’s Digital Accessibility Standard applies to websites, software, digital reports, and other digital assets. Executive branch agencies are required to ensure conformance with WCAG 2.1 Level AA.

    Minnesota

    Minnesota enforces the State of Minnesota Digital Accessibility Standard, most recently updated on July 1, 2024. It requires state agencies to meet WCAG 2.1 and provide accessible websites and digital documents.

    Missouri

    Missouri’s law, RSMo. 161.935, requires that all state agencies ensure their information technology is accessible throughout development, procurement, maintenance, and use. The law also extends to contracts and grants involving ICT.

    Montana

    Montana’s accessibility requirements are defined in state code 18-5-605 (formerly HB 239), which mandates that all state agencies provide IT access to individuals who are blind or visually impaired.

    Nebraska

    Nebraska’s Accessibility Policy requires that all ICT provided by state agencies meet WCAG 2.1 standards to ensure accessibility for users with disabilities.

    Nevada

    Nevada enforces its ADA Technology Accessibility Guidelines, which apply to all state entities and require conformance with WCAG 2.1.

    New Hampshire

    New Hampshire has its own Web and Mobile Application Accessibility Standards, which apply to all state agencies. The standards reinforce Section 508 compliance and recommend WCAG 2.0 as a guide to increase accessibility. A downloadable PDF of the standard is available on the state’s accessibility policy webpage.

    New Jersey

    New Jersey passed NJ A4856, a law requiring all digital platforms and web services used by school districts, charter schools, renaissance schools, and the Marie H. Katzenbach School for the Deaf to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA.

    New York

    New York follows Accessibility of Information Communication Technology (NYS-P08-005) along with Senate Bill S3114A. These policies set the minimum accessibility standards for state agency websites and require conformance with the most current version of the WCAG.

    Ohio

    Ohio’s Administrative Policy IT-09: Website Ability mandates that all state agency websites, including those developed by third-party vendors, conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA.

    Oklahoma

    Oklahoma enforces the Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility (EITA) Law, passed in 2004. This law incorporates the updated Section 508 standards and mandates WCAG 2.0 compliance for all state agencies.

    Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania’s Information Technology Policy (ITP-ACC001) requires that all state government agencies meet revised Section 508 standards and the most current version of WCAG Level AA. Agencies are also encouraged to strive toward Level AAA.

    Rhode Island

    Rhode Island mandates that all state websites meet W3C’s Priority 1 Checkpoints, which are based on WCAG 1.0 standards.

    Texas

    Texas enforces the Texas Web Accessibility Standards, which are part of its Electronic Information Resources Accessibility Policy. Based on Section 508, these standards also include unique criteria for webcasts, applets, and plug-ins. In addition, Texas Administrative Code Sections 206 and 213 require that all state government and higher education websites meet accessibility standards.

    Utah

    Utah’s code 63A-16-209 outlines accessibility requirements for executive branch agencies. It mandates that agency websites and IT systems conform to the latest version of WCAG.

    Virginia

    Virginia enforces both the Virginia Information Technology Access Act (ITAA) and the Virginia Information Technology Accessibility Standard. Created by the Virginia Information Technologies Agency (VITA), these standards require conformance to Section 508 and WCAG 2.0 Level AA for all state agencies and higher education institutions.

    Washington

    Washington enforces the USER-01 Accessibility Policy (formerly Policy 188), which applies to all state agencies. It sets WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the minimum requirement for digital accessibility.

    Need Help Navigating Accessibility Laws?

    rying to make sense of accessibility laws—especially when each state plays by slightly different rules—can feel like walking through fog. Just when you think you’ve figured it out, something changes. That’s completely normal.

    If you’re not sure where your website stands or what steps to take next, you don’t have to figure it out alone. We work with teams every day who are navigating this same landscape. Whether you’re starting from scratch or trying to patch up an old site, we’re here to help you move forward confidently—with clarity, not confusion.

    Let’s talk. Schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital, and we’ll help you sort out what applies, what matters most, and what to do about it.

    Note: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws are subject to change. Always consult with legal counsel or a qualified accessibility specialist.

    Greg McNeil

    July 22, 2025
    Legal Compliance
    Accessibility, accessibility laws, state accessibility laws, WCAG, Web Accessibility, Website Accessibility
  • How to Identify Decorative Images for Accessibility

    Images can bring a web page to life—but not all of them need to speak. When it comes to web accessibility, knowing which images are decorative and which are informative is key to creating a cleaner, smoother experience for people using screen readers and other assistive technologies. That’s where alternative text (alt text) comes in.

    You probably already use alt text to describe important images. But what about the purely visual ones—those flourishes and background elements? If they don’t add value beyond appearance, they might be decorative images. This article helps you identify which images fall into that category and how to properly mark them, so screen reader users aren’t bogged down by unnecessary noise.

    By focusing on even small improvements—like skipping redundant descriptions—you can build better, more respectful websites.

    What Makes an Image “Decorative”?

    Let’s start with the basics. According to WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 1.1.1: Non-text Content, all meaningful non-text content must have a text alternative. But decorative images are an exception—they don’t need a description because they don’t carry meaning.

    So, what exactly counts as decorative?

    Common Decorative Image Types

    • Borders, swirls, and flourishes that are strictly for looks
    • Icons next to already-labeled buttons (like a phone icon next to the word “Call”)
    • Stock photos that add mood or style but aren’t referenced in content
    • Repetitive logos or design elements used as dividers or backgrounds

    If removing the image doesn’t change the message or function of the page, you’re likely dealing with a decorative image.

    Making the Right Call: Informative or Decorative?

    It’s not always black and white. Here are a few quick questions to help:

    • Does the image convey info that isn’t available in the text?
    • Would a user miss out on something if the image was gone?
    • Is the image part of an instructional step, chart, or link?

    If you answer yes to any of these, the image is probably informative—and it needs descriptive alt text. If not, you may be safe to treat it as decorative.

    For a more detailed approach, try W3C’s Alt Decision Tree. It’s a great tool, but don’t worry—no one expects you to follow it like a script. Trust your content instincts too.

    Common Mistake Alert: Don’t mark company logos, charts, or instructional images as decorative. If they carry meaning or serve a function, they need proper alt text.

    How to Properly Mark Decorative Images in Code

    Once you’ve determined that an image is decorative, here’s how to ensure assistive technologies skip over it.

    Use an Empty Alt Attribute

    This is the most common and widely supported method:

    <img src="divider.png" alt="">

    Why does this work? A screen reader will completely ignore the image. This prevents confusion and keeps users focused on meaningful content.

    But be careful: don’t skip the alt attribute altogether. Leaving it out may cause screen readers to read the file name—something like “divider-dot-p-n-g”—which is exactly the kind of noise we’re trying to eliminate.

    Use role="presentation" or aria-hidden="true"

    For SVGs, icons, or complex visual elements that can’t use alt="", try one of these:

    <svg role="presentation">...</svg>
    <img src="swirl.svg" aria-hidden="true">

    What’s the Difference?

    • role= "presentation" tells assistive tech: this element is just for visuals.
    • aria-hidden= "true" hides the element from all assistive tech completely.

    Choose one—don’t combine them with an empty alt attribute. Using both can confuse the accessibility tree and cause unpredictable results.

    Best Practices & Pitfalls to Avoid

    To keep your decorative images accessible:

    • Use only one method to mark an image as decorative
    • Test your implementation using screen reader emulators, WAVE, or Lighthouse
    • Avoid using the word “decorative” in the alt text—use an empty alt attribute instead.
    • Always include the alt attribute, even if it’s empty.
    • Be careful not to hide meaningful images by using aria-hidden="true".

    It’s also a good idea to review your CMS settings. Many platforms automatically insert images or fill alt text fields with file names. Stay alert!

    Why It Matters: The Impact of Doing It Right

    When you handle decorative images properly, you create a better user experience for everyone:

    • Less noise for screen reader users, making it easier to navigate pages
    • A clearer focus on important content and messages
    • Reduced cognitive load, especially for users with visual or cognitive disabilities
    • Cleaner code that’s easier to maintain and optimize

    Bonus: It can even help with SEO by making your site more semantic and purposeful.

    Real users have reported better experiences when extra, repetitive images are removed from their screen reader journey. It’s a small step with a big payoff.

    Beyond Alt Text: Decorative Images Are Just One Part

    Identifying and labeling decorative images is one part of a much larger accessibility picture. But it’s a foundational step.

    Teams should regularly audit content—especially in environments where new images are often added, like blogs or e-commerce templates. Ask yourself: are new images truly meaningful, or just visual noise?

    Also, remember: accessibility isn’t one person’s job. It’s a shared responsibility. Designers, devs, marketers, and content creators all play a role in making digital experiences more inclusive.

    And if you’re using modern frameworks like React or Vue, be sure your components handle decorative images correctly and out of the box. A simple alt=”” on a reusable image tag can save a lot of friction.

    Keep Image Accessibility Intentional

    To recap: If an image is purely decorative, mark it so that screen readers skip over it. Use an empty alt="", or where needed, role= "presentation" or aria-hidden= "true". Don’t mix methods, and always test your work.

    Improving how you handle decorative images might seem like a small detail, but it’s a powerful way to respect your users and refine your site’s accessibility. Thoughtful design isn’t just about how a site looks—it’s about how it feels to navigate.

    Need a second pair of eyes on your accessibility implementation?

    Schedule an ADA accessibility briefing with 216digital. Our experts can help you identify gaps, offer hands-on guidance, and take the guesswork out of inclusive design—so your digital experiences work better for everyone.

    Greg McNeil

    June 23, 2025
    How-to Guides
    How-to, Image Alt Text, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, web developers, web development
  • Descriptive Page Titles for Better Accessibility

    If you’ve ever had 15 tabs open at once (and let’s be honest—who hasn’t?), you know how frustrating it is to click around trying to remember which one is which. When the titles are clear, you can find what you’re looking for in a second. When they’re not, it’s a guessing game.

    For users who rely on screen readers or who live with cognitive or memory challenges, vague titles aren’t just annoying. They’re a real barrier. That’s where descriptive page titles come in. They make a huge difference in helping all users navigate the web more easily, and they support your site’s overall usability and accessibility—without requiring a major overhaul.

    Best of all, it’s one of the simplest changes you can make that still packs a serious punch. A good page title improves orientation, reduces confusion, boosts your SEO rankings, and even helps reduce legal risk under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). All with a few well-chosen words.

    What WCAG 2.4.2 Actually Requires

    Under WCAG 2.4.2—a Level A requirement in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)—every web page must have a title that clearly describes its topic or purpose. It’s one of the most fundamental accessibility requirements, but it’s also one of the most overlooked.

    Simply having a <title> tag isn’t enough. What’s inside that tag matters. A vague or generic title—like “Home” or “Untitled”—does little to help users understand what the page is actually about. It’s a bit like labeling all your folders “Stuff”—no one can navigate that efficiently, especially not users relying on assistive technologies.

    This is especially important for screen reader users. Page titles are often read aloud as soon as a page loads or when switching between browser tabs. That brief moment of context helps them know exactly where they are. Similarly, sighted users benefit from meaningful titles when scanning through multiple open tabs or saving bookmarks for later reference.

    Who Benefits from Descriptive Page Titles?

    The short answer? Everyone. But here’s how it really plays out for different types of users:

    • Screen reader users hear the page title as their first introduction. A vague or incorrect title can throw them off or force them to dig deeper than necessary.
    • People with cognitive or memory challenges rely on titles to quickly understand whether a page is relevant. A well-written title can prevent information overload and reduce frustration.
    • Mobility-impaired users benefit because they can avoid unnecessary clicks or key presses if the title tells them they’re on the wrong page.
    • Everyone else—yes, even those without disabilities—appreciates descriptive page titles for the sheer convenience. Clear titles make it easier to navigate tabs, scan bookmarks, and share links confidently.

    When a title says exactly what a page delivers, no one has to guess. That’s good usability—and that’s what accessibility is really about.

    Common Title Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)

    Even with the best intentions, many websites still fall into title traps. Let’s look at a few common problems:

    • Too Vague: Titles like “Home” or “Blog” don’t help much when you’re trying to tell one tab from another.
    • Reused Titles: When every blog post or account page is titled the same—like “Monthly Statement”—users lose their place quickly.
    • Doesn’t Match the Page: If your title says “Pricing,” but the page is about features or FAQs, that mismatch causes confusion.
    • Overloaded for SEO: You’ve seen these: “Best Home Trim Vinyl Windows Outdoor Accessories 2025 Guide.” They’re trying to do too much and end up helping no one.

    Better Examples

    Consider replacing generic titles with more descriptive ones. For example, swap “Blog Post” with “How to Write Descriptive Page Titles.” You might also change “Services” to “Real World Accessibility | 216digital,” or “Contact” to “Contact Us – 216digital Web Team.”

    These small edits bring clarity, build trust, and boost both accessibility and SEO

    Accessibility and SEO: They Work Together

    There’s a common myth that writing for accessibility hurts SEO—but that couldn’t be further from the truth. In fact, descriptive page titles are a perfect example of how accessibility and SEO can work in harmony.

    Search engines love pages with relevant, concise, and unique titles. So do people. That means when you follow accessibility best practices, you’re also improving your site’s visibility and user engagement.

    Tips for Great Titles

    • Keep them between 30–60 characters so they don’t get cut off in search results or browser tabs.
    • Use primary keywords naturally, not awkwardly.
    • Try using a pattern like: [Page Topic] | [Brand Name].

    So, “About” becomes “About Our Team | 216digital” and “Pricing” becomes “Website Accessibility Pricing | 216digital.”

    It’s easy to see how small tweaks can have a big payoff.

    How to Improve Your Titles—Step by Step

    Here’s a quick plan to help you get your titles in shape:

    Audit Your Site

    Use automated tools to spot missing, duplicate, or unusually long titles. But don’t stop there—manual review is key to catching vague or misleading language that tools might miss.

    Apply a Simple Template

    Keep it consistent across your site: “[Page Topic] | [Brand]” works for most needs and helps build recognition.

    Loop in Your Team

    Content creators, developers, designers, and SEO specialists should all care about good descriptive page titles. Make it a shared goal—not an afterthought.

    Add it to Your Checklist

    Whether you’re launching a new blog post, updating a product page, or doing a site redesign, reviewing the title tag should be part of the process every time.

    The Risks of Getting It Wrong

    Ignoring this part of accessibility can lead to bigger problems. WCAG 2.4.2 is part of ADA compliance, and missing or misleading titles are often among the first things flagged in accessibility audits. If you’re not in compliance, you could be vulnerable to lawsuits—and nobody wants that.

    But beyond legal risk, failing to use descriptive page titles sends the wrong message. It suggests your site wasn’t built with every user in mind. And that hurts brand trust more than you might think.

    Final Thoughts: Titles That Work for Everyone

    It’s easy to overlook something as small as a page title. But when you take a step back, you’ll see that descriptive page titles affect every part of your site—from how users find you, to how they feel while browsing, to whether they come back at all.

    This one fix can make your site more usable, more discoverable, and more inclusive—without blowing up your workflow or budget. That’s what we call a smart move.

    Ready to Take Action?

    Want help reviewing your site for accessibility wins like this one? Schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital. We’ll show you how small changes like descriptive page titles can lead to big improvements in compliance, usability, and user trust—no pressure, no hard sell.

    Let’s build a web that works for everyone—starting with the title.

    Greg McNeil

    June 18, 2025
    How-to Guides
    Accessibility, How-to, Page Titles, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, Web Accessibility, web developers, web development, Website Accessibility
  • Web Accessibility for Retailers Under Legal Fire

    If you’re running an online retail business, digital accessibility might not be the first thing on your to-do list—but it needs to be. In today’s eCommerce landscape, accessibility for retailers isn’t just a best practice—it’s a legal requirement and a smart business move.

    Retail websites are complex, dynamic, and frequently updated, which makes them especially vulnerable to accessibility issues. And as more people rely on online shopping to meet daily needs, the stakes are higher than ever. Lawsuits are on the rise, but more importantly, so is the expectation that your site works for everyone.

    Product carousels, filters, multi-step checkout processes, popups, modals, and embedded third-party tools all add complexity and make accessibility more difficult.

    Why Web Accessibility for Retailers Matters

    Retailers have become one of the biggest targets for digital accessibility lawsuits. In fact, in 2024 alone, 77% of all web accessibility lawsuits in the U.S. targeted online retailers—making the industry the most litigated digital sector. These lawsuits aren’t just targeting Fortune 500 brands; regional and mid-market businesses are facing legal action at an increasing rate.

    There are several reasons for this:

    Retail Websites are Dynamic And Complex

    They’re filled with product carousels, filters, multi-step checkout processes, popups, modals, and embedded third-party tools—all of which can be difficult to make accessible. Without proper structure, markup, and ARIA attributes, these elements can become unusable for people relying on screen readers or keyboard navigation.

    eCommerce Sites Are Constantly Updated

    Product pages change, promotions rotate, and new features are added regularly. These updates often introduce new accessibility problems—especially when not reviewed with accessibility in mind.

    Online Shopping is Essential

    It’s no longer a luxury; it’s how millions of people access everyday goods and services. If a website prevents someone from completing a purchase due to an accessibility barrier, it becomes a civil rights issue—legally and ethically.

    Demand Letters Are Widespread

    Each year, hundreds of thousands of demand letters are sent to businesses for digital accessibility violations. These letters signal that a company is excluding people with disabilities, and the reputational damage can be immediate.

    Legal and Technical Web Accessibility for Retailers

    Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)requires U.S. retailers to ensure accessibility for people with disabilities in all places of public accommodation. In today’s digital world, the courts and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have made it clear: this requirement also applies to websites—especially those that sell goods and services to the public.

    Courts and plaintiffs use the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as the standard for compliance in nearly all accessibility-related lawsuits. The DOJ reaffirmed this approach in 2024, solidifying WCAG as the benchmark for evaluating whether a website is accessible.

    The Four Golden Rules of Accessibility: POUR

    At the heart of WCAG are four key principles known by the acronym POUR: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust. These form the foundation for accessible digital experiences and help ensure your website works for everyone.

    • Perceivable – Users must be able to identify and interact with content. This includes providing text alternatives for images, captions for videos, and other sensory accommodations.
    • Operable – The site must support navigation with a keyboard, screen reader, or other assistive tools—without relying solely on a mouse.
    • Understandable – Information and functionality should be easy to comprehend and behave in expected ways to avoid confusion.
    • Robust – Content must be compatible with a wide range of current and future assistive technologies, such as screen readers or voice commands.

    And it’s not just your website. These principles should also extend to digital documents, confirmation emails, customer service interactions, and anything else a user might engage with online.

    Common Pitfalls on Retail Websites

    Retail sites face some of the most complex accessibility challenges. Here are a few issues that often trigger lawsuits:

    • Unlabeled or mislabeled form fields that prevent screen reader users from checking out.
    • Broken keyboard navigation makes it impossible for users with motor impairments to complete transactions.
    • Missing alt text on product images.
    • Low color contrast between text and backgrounds.
    • Non-dismissable modals or popups that trap users.
    • Checkout flows that break when even one component isn’t accessible.

    These barriers frequently appear when using templates, third-party plugins, or custom JavaScript that hasn’t been accessibility-tested. They can completely disrupt the buying experience for users who depend on assistive technologies. Web accessibility for retailers requires a consistent and intentional approach to prevent these obstacles from resurfacing.

    What Happens If You’re Sued

    Most lawsuits begin with a demand letter—often asking for immediate remediation and a financial settlement. If ignored, this can escalate into a federal lawsuit under the ADA or state-level laws like California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, which allows for additional penalties.

    Settlements may cover remediation costs and legal fees, but the real damage is often reputational—especially when exclusion of disabled users becomes public knowledge.

    Even if your business wins the case, legal defense costs are high. And if your site remains non-compliant, you may be targeted again. With web accessibility for retailers, prevention is significantly less costly than a reactive legal defense.

    A Proactive Plan for Retailers

    Accessibility isn’t a one-time fix. It’s an ongoing strategy. Here’s how to start with accessibility for retailers:

    1. Start with an Audit

    Use automated tools like Lighthouse or WAVE for a quick scan. But don’t stop there—manual testing is essential for identifying real-world usability barriers.

    2. Fix Key Areas First

    Prioritize your homepage, product pages, cart, and checkout. Make sure form fields are labeled, keyboard navigation works, and screen readers can read your content.

    3. Address Dynamic Elements

    Focus on complex components—like popups, modals, filters, and third-party integrations—that often create the biggest challenges. Use semantic markup and ARIA attributes to support assistive tech.

    4. Monitor Continuously

    Your site changes frequently. Build accessibility checks into your update process so new features don’t break usability, or use a monitoring service like a11y.Radar.

    5. Train Your Team

    Give your developers, content editors, and marketing teams the knowledge they need to create inclusive content from the start.

    6. Consider Outside Help

    Accessibility is nuanced. A qualified team can help you get it right—and keep it that way.

    Retailers: Don’t Let Accessibility Be an Afterthought

    Web accessibility for retailers is no longer optional. It’s central to building a sustainable, inclusive, and legally safe business. In a digital environment where over 30% of the top 500 eCommerce retailers were sued last year, doing nothing is no longer a risk—it’s a liability.

    But there’s a real upside, too. Accessibility leads to better experiences, broader audiences, stronger SEO, and a more trusted brand.

    Start now. Audit your site. Fix the gaps. Train your team. Partner with experts. Turn accessibility from a compliance headache into a strategic advantage.

    Need Help Making Your Retail Site Accessible?

    216digital offers full audits, real-world testing, and proactive monitoring to ensure your site meets WCAG standards and stays lawsuit-resistant. Let’s make your eCommerce experience inclusive—and legally safe—from day one.

    Greg McNeil

    June 11, 2025
    Legal Compliance
    Accessibility, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ecommerce website, Retail, WCAG, Web Accessibility, Website Accessibility
  • WordPress Accessibility: Common Pitfalls & Fixes

    WordPress gives developers a head start with accessibility—but it’s just that: a start. While the platform includes solid foundations like semantic markup and keyboard-friendly admin features, building an experience that works for everyone still requires thoughtful decisions on our part. As developers, we’re in a unique position to go beyond the basics, spotting the small oversights that can create big barriers for users.

    In this guide, we’ll walk through some of the most common accessibility missteps we see in WordPress projects—along with practical fixes you can implement right away. Whether you’re refactoring an old theme or launching something new, these insights are meant to help you create experiences that are not just compliant, but genuinely inclusive.

    Misuse of Heading Structures for Visual Styling

    It’s easy to reach for <h2> or <h3> tags to style text because they’re built into most WordPress themes with bold and larger font sizes. But when headings are used purely for visual emphasis—not structure—you end up distorting the page’s semantic outline.

    Why It Matters

    Screen reader users often rely on heading navigation to scan and jump between sections. If headings are skipped, out of order, or misused, the page becomes harder to understand, and key content may get missed entirely.

    How to Fix It

    • Use CSS for Styling: Apply styles using classes or inline styles, not heading tags. In Gutenberg, you can use blocks with custom styles or reusable blocks instead of jumping heading levels.
    • Follow a Logical Heading Hierarchy: Begin with one <h1> per page (usually the title), then use <h2> for top-level sections, <h3> for subsections, and so on.
    • Audit Your Work: Use tools like WAVE or the Google Lighthouse Accessibility Report to evaluate your heading structure and flag potential misuses before they go live.

    Overreliance on Theme Defaults for Color Contrast

    Many developers trust their WordPress theme’s default color scheme to do the heavy lifting—but while a palette may look good visually, it doesn’t mean it’s accessible. Default colors often fail to meetWCAG 2.1 AA standards, especially for body text and buttons.

    Accessibility Risk

    Poor color contrast is a major barrier for users with low vision or color blindness. If your text blends into the background, you’re excluding readers—sometimes without realizing it.

    Practical Fixes

    • Test Contrast Ratios: Use WebAIM’s Contrast Checker or the Color Contrast Analyzer to validate text against its background.
    • Override Theme Defaults: Most modern themes offer customization options via the Customizer or Full Site Editing. Make small adjustments—lighten text, darken backgrounds—to meet or exceed the 4.5:1 minimum contrast ratio.
    • Offer User Controls: Consider giving users the ability to switch to high-contrast mode with plugins like “WP Accessibility.” This gives more control to your users while improving inclusivity.

    Improper List Markup Practices

    It’s not unusual to see developers create the appearance of a list using <div> tags, line breaks, or other non-semantic methods—especially in custom blocks or page builders commonly used in WordPress.

    Why It’s a Problem

    Screen readers rely on semantic tags like <ul>, <ol>, and <li> to announce that a list exists, how many items are in it, and how items relate to each other. Without this structure, users lose context.

    Best Practices

    • Use Native List Markup: If it’s a list—code it as a list. Use <ul> for unordered lists and <ol> for ordered ones. Wrap each list item in <li>.
    • Handle Nesting Thoughtfully: For sub-lists, nest another <ul> or <ol> inside an <li>. Screen readers will announce the nested structure properly.
    • Test Your Output: Run accessibility audits or inspect the DOM to ensure list structures are coded semantically, especially when using custom Gutenberg blocks or page builders.

    Neglecting Contextual Relevance in Alt Text

    WordPress auto-generates alt text from image file names if authors don’t supply one. That’s how you end up with images labeled “IMG_4829.jpg”—which isn’t helpful to anyone.

    Why It Matters

    Alt text should describe why the image is there, not just what it looks like. If the image provides important context, instructions, or emotion, a generic label fails users who rely on screen readers.

    What Developers Can Do

    • Write Purpose-Driven Alt Text: If the image is showing a concept, outcome, or step in a process, describe that context directly. For example, “Screenshot of the plugin settings menu with Accessibility Mode enabled.”
    • Avoid Phrases Like “Image of…” Screen readers already announce the presence of an image. Jump straight into the relevant description.
    • Use Empty Alt for Decorative Images: For visuals that are purely aesthetic and add no informational value, use alt="" so assistive tech knows to skip it entirely.

    Overuse and Misapplication of ARIA Attributes

    ARIA is a powerful toolset—but like any tool, misuse can cause more harm than good. Adding roles and attributes without understanding their implications can break screen reader behavior or clutter the accessibility tree.

    The Real Cost

    Improper ARIA use can confuse assistive technologies, interfere with default behaviors, and even make components harder—not easier—to use. Overengineering is just as dangerous as under-engineering.

    Smarter ARIA Use

    • Favor Native HTML First: If you’re building a checkbox, <input type="checkbox"> with an associated <label> is far more reliable than using a <div> with ARIA roles and states.
    • Use ARIA Only When Required: If you’re building a custom interactive widget (like a tabbed interface or menu), consult the ARIA Authoring Practices Guide. Choose correct roles and manage keyboard interactions accordingly.
    • Test Your Implementation: Use screen readers like NVDA or VoiceOver to verify that ARIA is behaving as expected. Pay attention to focus, announcements, and interaction patterns.

    Overlooking Keyboard Navigation and Focus Management

    Many developers unintentionally design for mouse users first. But for users relying on keyboards—whether due to preference, disability, or temporary injury—keyboard accessibility is critical.

    Key Accessibility Concerns

    • No Visible Focus Indicators: Removing browser outlines with outline: none; without providing alternatives leaves users lost.
    • Custom Components Not Keyboard-Aware: Modals, sliders, dropdowns, and carousels built from scratch often lack proper keyboard event handling and focus management.

    Developer-Friendly Fixes

    • Ensure Focus Visibility: Style focused elements clearly using CSS, like :focus { outline: 2px solid #000; }. Customize this to match your theme, but don’t remove it entirely.
    • Handle Keyboard Events: For custom components, add keydown or keyup listeners to handle Enter, Escape, and Arrow keys appropriately. Don’t rely on click events alone.
    • Do Keyboard-Only Testing: Regularly test your site using only the keyboard. Tab through each interactive element and verify focus moves logically, without skipping important controls.

    What True Accessibility Looks Like in WordPress

    Accessibility isn’t a checklist—it’s a mindset. When we write clean, semantic code, ensure visual clarity, and support every way a user might interact with our sites, we’re not just doing right by WCAG—we’re doing right by our users. The real goal is to build experiences that work for everyone, without assumptions about how people navigate the web.

    As WordPress developers, we have powerful tools and a vibrant ecosystem at our disposal. Let’s use them with care and intention. Keep testing, stay curious, and don’t hesitate to dig deeper. And if you’re looking to strengthen your accessibility efforts, 216digital offers ADA compliance briefings tailored to development teams. We’re here to support your work—because inclusive development is better development.

    Greg McNeil

    June 10, 2025
    How-to Guides, Legal Compliance
    Accessibility, How-to, WCAG, Web Accessibility, web developers, web development, Website Accessibility, WordPress
  • Up and Coming ARIA Implementation

    Web accessibility is always evolving. Keeping up isn’t just beneficial—it’s crucial. Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) help developers build experiences that are usable by everyone, especially those with disabilities. As web standards advance, new ARIA attributes and roles emerge. Recently, ARIA 1.3 has introduced several notable features developers should start adopting now.

    Many of these are still in what could be called the “infrastructure stage”—they’re well-defined and available, but support across assistive tech and browsers remains inconsistent. That’s precisely why now is the time to pay attention. Understanding emerging ARIA implementation ensures your projects remain inclusive, user-friendly, and future-proof.

    This article explores fresh ARIA implementation options, their current support levels, and how developers can practically integrate them into real-world workflows.

    New and Noteworthy ARIA Attributes

    aria-errormessage

    Effective error messaging can significantly enhance usability. The ARIA implementation of aria-errormessage connects specific error messages to input fields when aria-invalid="true" is active. Unlike aria-describedby, this explicitly identifies the message as an error, and it’s only announced when the field is invalid—streamlining feedback for screen reader users.

    Support: Strong across JAWS, NVDA, and iOS VoiceOver. More limited in other environments.

    Example

    <label for="email">Email:</label>
    <input type="email" id="email" aria-invalid="true" aria-errormessage="emailError">
    <span id="emailError">Please enter a valid email address.</span>

    aria-description

    This attribute supplements existing descriptive labels by offering additional, programmatically available context that isn’t always visible on screen. It’s ideal for providing hints that enhance usability without cluttering the UI. For example, use aria-description="You are here:" to add orientation to breadcrumb navigation.


    Support: Currently handled well by NVDA and iOS VoiceOver; other screen readers may ignore it or misinterpret its purpose.

    Example

    <button aria-label="Download" aria-description="Downloads the current report in PDF format.">Download</button>

    aria-details

    The ARIA implementation of aria-details links an element to rich, supplementary content—replacing the outdated and poorly supported longdesc. It’s perfect for enhancing understanding of charts, data tables, and complex graphics.

    Support: Announced in some screen readers, but there’s currently no direct navigation path from the referenced element to the details content—limiting usability in production environments.

    Example

    <img src="chart.png" alt="Sales Chart" aria-details="chartDetails">
    <div id="chartDetails">
      <p>This chart shows sales data from Q1 to Q4, highlighting growth trends.</p>
    </div>

    aria-keyshortcuts

    Keyboard accessibility remains critical for many users. The ARIA implementation of aria-keyshortcuts lets developers document expected key commands directly in markup, making interfaces easier to learn and navigate via screen readers.

    Important note: This does not create functionality—it simply advertises the shortcut to assistive tech.

    Support: Fairly robust in Chrome and Edge; less so in Firefox and mobile platforms.

    Example

    <button aria-label="Mute" aria-keyshortcuts="Ctrl+M">Mute</button>

    aria-placeholder

    This attribute serves as a screen-reader-friendly version of the native placeholder attribute, particularly useful for custom form controls like div[contenteditable]. Unlike native placeholders, the text won’t be announced after the field is filled, avoiding redundancy.

    Support: Surprisingly consistent across JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack.

    Example

    <div contenteditable="true" role="textbox" aria-placeholder="Enter your comment here..."></div>

    Emerging ARIA Roles Enhancing Semantic Meaning

    Editorial and Collaborative Roles

    Roles like role="mark", role="comment", and role="suggestion" provide semantic meaning in collaborative environments—useful in rich text editors, document workflows, and feedback tools.

    • mark: Highlights text.
    • comment: Marks feedback or user-generated discussion.
    • suggestion: Flags proposed edits or changes.

    Support: Varies widely. role="mark" is gaining traction due to its alignment with <mark>. Others are still emerging.

    Example

    <p>The final decision was <span role="suggestion">to postpone the launch</span> until next quarter.</p>

    Technical and Temporal Roles

    New semantic roles such as role="code" and role="time" help describe technical or time-based content when native elements like <code> or <time> aren’t feasible—particularly in component-based frameworks.

    Support: Minimal at present but useful for long-term semantic clarity.

    Example

    <div role="code">const sum = (a, b) => a + b;</div>
    <div role="time" datetime="2025-06-06T13:49:19-04:00">June 6, 2025, 1:49 PM EDT</div>

    role=”image”

    This is functionally equivalent to role="img" but offers a clearer, natural-language alternative. While it doesn’t change behavior, it can improve code readability and naming consistency across projects.

    Example

    <div role="image" aria-label="Company Logo">
      <img src="logo.png" alt="">
    </div>

    Practical Implementation Considerations

    Assessing Support Across Assistive Technologies

    Not every ARIA implementation feature enjoys uniform support. The ecosystem includes screen readers like JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, TalkBack, and browsers like Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari. Always test your ARIA implementations across a matrix of platforms and devices. What works well in one may fail silently in another.

    Tested Environments (May 2025)

    • Windows 11: JAWS, NVDA, Narrator
    • macOS Sequoia: VoiceOver
    • iOS 18.4: VoiceOver (Safari)
    • Android 15: TalkBack (Chrome)

    Support varies—stay informed and test often.

    Best Practices for Adoption

    1. Use semantic HTML first. ARIA should enhance—not replace—native elements.
    2. Progressively enhance. Build baseline functionality, then layer in ARIA attributes where they add real value.
    3. Test with real users. Automated tests only go so far. Gather feedback from people who use assistive tech every day.
    4. Implement gracefully. Ensure content degrades without breaking if ARIA features aren’t supported.
    5. Stay proactive. Keep track of ARIA spec updates and screen reader changelogs.

    Conclusion

    Web accessibility isn’t static. Staying ahead of emerging ARIA implementation trends helps developers build experiences that are not just compliant, but genuinely inclusive. Attributes like aria-errormessage, aria-description, and editorial roles like role="comment" signal the future of accessible interaction.

    Many of these features may still be waiting for widespread support—but early adoption by thoughtful developers will shape best practices and standards moving forward.

    To lead with confidence in this evolving space, consider scheduling an ADA briefing with 216digital. Their accessibility experts can help you implement forward-looking ARIA features in a way that’s both robust and user-first—positioning your organization as a leader in inclusive design.

    Greg McNeil

    June 6, 2025
    How-to Guides
    Accessibility, ARIA, How-to, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, web developers, web development
  • Law Firms Aren’t Built for Accessibility Remediation Services

    When a demand letter lands in your inbox, or an ADA-related lawsuit hits your desk, your first thought might be to call a lawyer. That’s a natural reaction—after all, legal issues usually call for legal help.

    But here’s where things get a little more complicated: if the problem is your website’s accessibility, then legal advice alone won’t fix it. And that’s where many businesses take a wrong turn. Legal teams can guide you through the paperwork, but they’re rarely the ones who dig into your code, address the real barriers, or help you prevent the next lawsuit.

    This article walks you through why relying on a law firm to handle accessibility remediation services might not be the best move—and what a smarter, more effective approach looks like.

    The Problem: Law Firms Handle Lawsuits—Not Code

    Let’s be clear—attorneys have an important role. If you’ve received a demand letter or lawsuit, they can help you respond, negotiate, or represent you in court. But legal involvement doesn’t make the accessibility problem go away. The root issue—your website not working for people with disabilities—still remains. And it’s that issue that continues to carry legal and reputational risk.

    Most law firms don’t have in-house technical teams. No developers, no certified accessibility experts, no usability testers. So what happens? They either outsource the actual accessibility remediation services to third-party vendors (often charging a premium along the way) or provide high-level reports filled with checklists that leave your dev team guessing at what to do next.

    That means you’re still on the hook for the real work—and possibly paying more for it.

    Hidden Risk #1: You’ll Pay More for Less

    Law firms typically charge by the hour, which makes sense for legal tasks like reviewing contracts or negotiating settlements. But when they apply those same rates to accessibility-related work—such as interpreting WCAG guidelines, coordinating with vendors, or reviewing audit summaries—it turns into a costly game of telephone.

    You end up paying for layers of administrative overhead that slow down progress and don’t actually improve your website.

    Worse, you might not even realize where the money is going. Legal fees can pile up quickly without producing the tangible results your business actually needs: a compliant, accessible, functional website. For small to mid-size organizations trying to manage both compliance and budget, this model is hard to justify.

    Hidden Risk #2: The Fixes May Not Be Complete

    Fixing accessibility isn’t about running a quick scan and addressing a handful of errors. Real remediation requires technical precision, contextual judgment, and manual testing—especially with screen readers and keyboard navigation. It involves understanding how accessibility issues present in code and how they affect the user experience for people with different disabilities.

    Many law firms don’t have the tools—or the trained personnel—to go that deep. And their vendor partners often lean heavily on automated tools that only catch surface-level issues.

    Here’s what that kind of partial remediation can miss:

    • Form fields without accessible labels
    • Improper heading structures that confuse screen readers
    • Modal windows that can’t be closed without a mouse
    • Buttons or links that don’t receive keyboard focus
    • Dynamic content changes that don’t alert assistive technologies

    These aren’t fringe cases—they’re exactly the kinds of issues that trigger lawsuits. Unfortunately, teams often overlook them when legal experts, rather than technical specialists, lead accessibility remediation efforts.

    Hidden Risk #3: No Plan for the Long Term

    Even if your legal team manages to patch things up for now, accessibility isn’t a one-and-done situation. Websites evolve. New content is added. Platforms update. If you don’t have an ongoing plan, you risk falling out of compliance all over again—and landing back in legal trouble.

    Law firms are built for casework, not for long-term technical oversight. Most won’t offer monitoring services, provide training for your content team, or stay engaged as your digital properties change over time. Without a partner who understands how to maintain accessibility remediation services, you’re left exposed.

    That’s why sustainable compliance calls for a proactive strategy—one that goes beyond legal checkboxes and focuses on real-world usability, continuous improvement, and future-proofing your site.

    What Proper Accessibility Remediation Services Look Like

    To address ADA compliance issues the right way, you need more than legal advice—you need a full-service accessibility team that knows how to diagnose, prioritize, and implement lasting solutions.

    Here’s what effective accessibility remediation services typically involve:

    1. In-Depth Accessibility Audit

    Experienced accessibility professionals start by reviewing your site against WCAG 2.1 A/AA standards using both automated and manual testing. This ensures nothing gets missed. A proper audit covers the following:

    • Screen reader testing using tools like NVDA, JAWS, or VoiceOver
    • Keyboard-only navigation analysis
    • Color contrast checks
    • Semantic HTML review
    • ARIA role validation for dynamic content

    It’s this level of testing that uncovers real usability barriers.

    2. A Clear, Actionable Roadmap

    Instead of a vague checklist, a solid remediation team will provide a prioritized list of issues, each translated into plain language with clear technical recommendations. The goal is to make it easy for developers to understand what needs to be fixed—and how.

    3. Code-Level Fixes

    This is the heart of remediation. A professional team doesn’t just point out problems—they roll up their sleeves and solve them. That includes adjusting templates, improving focus states, rewriting inaccessible components, and ensuring your code structure supports screen readers and keyboard navigation.

    It’s hands-on work—and it requires skilled front-end developers who understand both accessibility and UX.

    4. Real-World Usability Testing

    After you make changes, your work isn’t done. Test the updated site again—this time in real-world scenarios using assistive technologies. This step confirms that your remediation efforts actually work for the people they’re designed to support.

    5. Documentation & Legal Support

    While not a substitute for a legal team, many remediation partners provide helpful documentation—such as accessibility statements, conformance reports (like VPATs), and audit results—that demonstrate your organization’s commitment to accessibility. These materials can also support your response if you’re facing legal scrutiny.

    6. Ongoing Monitoring

    Even after remediation, your site should be monitored regularly. A good partner will offer scanning tools like a11y.Radar for testing and alerts to catch issues early—before they turn into compliance risks.

    Why Accessibility Professionals Are the Better Fit

    Accessibility specialists solve the actual problem: they make websites usable for people with disabilities. They work closely with your development, design, and content teams to create solutions that align with your brand, support your UX goals, and meet compliance requirements.

    Unlike law firms, accessibility pros don’t just help you react—they help you prepare. Their job is to prevent problems, not just manage them after the fact.

    They bring technical knowledge, lived user experience insights, and a collaborative mindset to the table. That’s how you get lasting results—not just legal coverage, but a stronger, more inclusive digital presence.

    Conclusion: The Smart Path to Lasting Compliance

    If you’re navigating legal pressure because of an inaccessible website, it’s important to act quickly—but also wisely. Legal teams play a role, yes, but true ADA compliance requires more than legal documents and advice. It takes technical expertise, accessibility remediation services, and a long-term plan that goes beyond checking boxes.

    The right partner doesn’t just help you respond to a lawsuit—they help you prevent the next one by making your website genuinely usable for everyone. That means fewer legal risks, stronger user trust, and a better experience across the board.

    At 216digital, we specialize in real solutions—not just legal responses. From WCAG audits and code-level fixes to usability testing and ongoing monitoring, we help you build and maintain a site that works for everyone.

    Schedule an ADA briefing with our accessibility team today to get clear, honest guidance on what your site needs, what’s at risk, and how to move forward confidently. Let’s make your compliance efforts count—for your users and your business.

    Greg McNeil

    June 4, 2025
    Legal Compliance
    Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, Accessibility testing, ADA Compliance, WCAG, Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Remediation, Website Accessibility
  • Mastering ARIA in HTML: A Guide for Developers

    If you’re building digital experiences in 2025, you know the landscape has evolved significantly. Mobile dominates, and for over a billion people with disabilities worldwide, accessibility isn’t a luxury—it’s essential. As front-end developers and accessibility specialists, our role extends beyond coding for functionality—we’re creating inclusive experiences.

    This is precisely where ARIA in HTML steps up. When native HTML can’t clearly communicate what dynamic interfaces are doing—like expanding menus, modal dialogs, or custom widgets—ARIA bridges those gaps. Used effectively, it connects aesthetic, intuitive front-end design with genuinely accessible user experiences.

    Let’s explore how to effectively incorporate ARIA in HTML, steer clear of common pitfalls, and ensure your mobile-first designs prioritize inclusion from the outset.

    Understanding ARIA in HTML

    ARIA, or Accessible Rich Internet Applications, is a W3C specification designed to enhance semantic meaning in web content. Essentially, it’s metadata crafted specifically to communicate clearly with assistive technologies like screen readers.

    You might wonder—why not rely exclusively on semantic HTML?

    We absolutely should prioritize semantic HTML. However, certain custom components—like custom dropdowns or dynamic interfaces—can surpass what native HTML can express. That’s exactly where ARIA in HTML becomes indispensable.

    ARIA Comprises Three Key Components

    • Roles: Clearly define an element’s function.
    • States: Indicate conditions that change dynamically (expanded/collapsed).
    • Properties: Offer consistent, generally static information (labels or relationships).

    Let’s explore these individually to clarify their application.

    ARIA Roles – Clearly Defining Element Purpose

    ARIA roles inform assistive technologies precisely what an element represents. They’re foundational to implementing ARIA effectively.

    Common Role Categories

    • Landmark Roles guide users through structural sections: <nav role="navigation" aria-label="Main Navigation">…</nav>
    • Widget Roles identify interactive controls: <div role="button" tabindex="0" aria-pressed="false">Toggle</div>
    • Document Structure Roles illustrate content hierarchies, such as headings, articles, or lists.
    • Abstract Roles provide a structural foundation but aren’t directly used in code.

    ARIA roles effectively transform generic <div> elements into meaningful components, but only when a suitable native element isn’t available. For instance, always prefer <button> over div[role="button"] when possible.

    ARIA States and Properties – Capturing Dynamic Interactivity

    ARIA truly demonstrates its value in conveying dynamic content behavior. When UI elements change states—like expanding menus, selecting items, or providing live updates—ARIA states and properties clearly relay this to assistive technology.

    • States (change dynamically): aria-expanded, aria-checked, aria-pressed
    • Properties (typically static): aria-labelledby, aria-describedby, aria-controls

    Example: Expandable Menu

    <button aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="menu">Menu</button>
    <ul id="menu" hidden>
      <li><a href="#">Item 1</a></li>
      <li><a href="#">Item 2</a></li>
    </ul>

    Example: Labeled Input

    <label id="emailLabel">Email:</label>
    <input type="email" aria-labelledby="emailLabel">

    States and properties ensure screen reader users consistently understand UI changes in real-time, creating seamless interactions.

    ARIA in Mobile Web Development – Best Practices

    Mobile development introduces unique accessibility considerations. Small screens, touch interfaces, and various screen readers can complicate implementation, but well-executed ARIA enhances the responsive design experience.

    Mobile Considerations

    • Touch Targets: Ensure sufficient size and spacing.
    • Screen Readers: Regularly test with VoiceOver (iOS) and TalkBack (Android).
    • Responsiveness: Maintain ARIA accuracy through layout shifts.

    Best Practices

    • Always use native HTML elements first. Opt for <button> when possible.
    • Avoid redundant roles. A <nav> inherently has navigation context and typically doesn’t require role="navigation" unless clarified with aria-label.
    • Ensure all interactive elements are keyboard-accessible.
    • Provide clear accessible names with aria-label or aria-labelledby.

    Common Pitfalls

    • Misusing aria-hidden: Avoid hiding interactive elements, as it disrupts user experiences.
    • Incorrect roles: Assign roles strictly aligned with functionality—avoid role="button" on non-interactive headings.

    When implemented thoughtfully, ARIA in HTML fosters accessible, intuitive mobile experiences.

    ARIA and WCAG – Achieving Accessibility Standards

    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) provide essential standards for digital accessibility. ARIA complements WCAG, offering practical ways to achieve compliance and enhance experiences.

    WCAG Principles Supported by ARIA

    • Perceivable: Communicates dynamic content clearly (e.g., aria-live).
    • Operable: Facilitates keyboard control via appropriate roles and states.
    • Understandable: Clarifies purpose using meaningful labels.
    • Robust: Ensures future-proof, compatible experiences.

    Correct ARIA use significantly advances your site towards WCAG 2.2 AA compliance, enhancing accessibility comprehensively.

    Testing ARIA Implementations – Tools and Techniques

    Effective ARIA in HTML requires rigorous testing—without it, even perfect code can fail users.

    Recommended Tools

    • WAVE: Quickly identify visual ARIA issues via Chrome.
    • NVDA (Windows) and VoiceOver (macOS/iOS): Essential screen reader testing.
    • BrowserStack Workflow Scanner: Detects ARIA issues in user workflows.

    Testing Strategies

    • Automated Tests: Detect immediate issues like missing labels or roles.
    • Manual Tests: Tab through interactive elements; ensure clarity with screen readers.
    • User Tests: Real-world feedback remains crucial for catching overlooked issues.

    Comprehensive testing ensures ARIA implementations genuinely enhance user accessibility rather than hindering it.

    ARIA You Ready for Accessibility?

    ARIA in HTML isn’t a magical solution—it’s a powerful tool. Utilized effectively, it allows developers to build accessible digital experiences that resonate with everyone, particularly crucial for mobile users dependent on assistive technology.

    As developers, designers, and accessibility experts, we’re collectively responsible for crafting an inclusive web. Let’s commit to making accessibility integral—not an afterthought.

    Need guidance with ARIA strategies or comprehensive accessibility audits? 216digital offers expertise and support. Schedule a quick ADA compliance briefing and discover how your site can confidently meet and surpass WCAG standards.

    Let’s continue advancing accessibility, enhancing experiences one ARIA attribute at a time.

    Greg McNeil

    May 27, 2025
    How-to Guides
    Accessibility, ARIA, aria-describedby, aria-label, How-to, WCAG, Web Accessibility
  • Ease Into Motion: Smarter Animation Accessibility

    Imagine clicking into a website and being hit with swirling graphics, sliding panels, or a bouncing button that just won’t stop. For many people, that kind of animation isn’t just annoying—it’s physically harmful. Dizziness. Nausea. Migraines. Disorientation. For users with motion sensitivity, these effects are all too common.

    As developers, we love using motion to make our interfaces feel alive. But when it comes to animation accessibility, we need to be just as thoughtful about who we’re designing for. Great UI isn’t just beautiful—it’s inclusive. And making motion safer doesn’t mean removing it altogether. It just means giving people control.

    This guide breaks down what you need to know about motion sensitivity, how to comply with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), and how to build user-friendly animation for your projects using CSS, JavaScript, and real-world techniques.

    Who’s Affected by Motion—and Why It Matters

    Motion sensitivity happens when animations or transitions trigger unpleasant physical reactions. This might include nausea, vertigo, blurry vision, headaches, or even migraines. It’s especially common for people with:

    • Vestibular disorders
    • Autism spectrum disorder
    • ADHD
    • Epilepsy

    In fact, over 35% of adults experience some kind of vestibular dysfunction by age 40. That’s not a small edge case—it’s a significant part of your user base.

    The Trouble With Flashing and Distractions

    Animations can also cause cognitive overload. Users with ADHD or processing differences may find it hard to stay focused when elements are constantly moving. Looping carousels or animated background transitions can pull attention away from the main content or calls to action.

    And then there’s photosensitive epilepsy. About 3% of people with epilepsy can have seizures triggered by flashing lights—especially red-on-black or high-contrast flickers. That’s why WCAG has strict guidelines around flash frequency.

    WCAG and Animation Accessibility: What to Follow

    Before diving into the specifics, it’s important to understand that these aren’t arbitrary rules—they exist to protect people. Animation accessibility is a fundamental part of inclusive design, and these guidelines offer a framework that helps you avoid unintentional harm.

    Key Guidelines

    • 2.2.2 – Pause, Stop, Hide: Any moving content that starts automatically must have a clear way to pause or hide it, unless the motion is essential.
    • 2.3.1 – Three Flashes or Below Threshold: Avoid flashing more than 3 times per second.
    • 2.3.3 – Animation from Interactions: If your animation happens because someone clicked, scrolled, or hovered—it still needs to be safe and optional.

    How to Apply These Guidelines

    • Don’t loop animations forever.
    • Offer controls to pause or stop motion.
    • Never rely on animation alone to convey important info—back it up with text or icons.

    Animation accessibility is about making sure motion adds value without harm.

    Using CSS to Respect Motion Preferences

    What Is @prefers-reduced-motion?

    This media query checks whether a user has asked for less motion in their operating system:

    @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
      * {
        animation: none !important;
        transition: none !important;
      }
    }

    If users toggle Reduce motion in macOS, iOS, Windows, Android, or Linux, they’ll instantly get a calmer experience.

    Design Strategies

    • Remove parallax scroll and large translations.
    • Swap animated GIFs with a static frame or CSS background-image.
    • Tone down fades and slides—transitions shorter than 250 ms are usually fine.
    • Provide fallbacks that still communicate state changes (e.g., use color or underline instead of a shake animation to signal “invalid input”).

    Giving Users Control With JavaScript

    Even if someone’s system doesn’t request reduced motion, they should still have a choice. Here’s a simple example:

    <button id="toggle-motion">Toggle motion</button>
    <script>
      document.getElementById('toggle-motion').addEventListener('click', () => {
        document.body.classList.toggle('reduce-motion');
        localStorage.setItem('reduceMotion', document.body.classList.contains('reduce-motion'));
      });
      // Persist preference between visits
      if (localStorage.getItem('reduceMotion') === 'true') {
        document.body.classList.add('reduce-motion');
      }
    </script>

    Then, in your CSS:

    .reduce-motion * {
      animation: none !important;
      transition: none !important;
    }

    Let users decide what works for them. Animation accessibility is about empowerment.

    Pause on Hover or Interaction

    You can also pause motion when someone hovers or focuses:

    @keyframes spin { to { transform: rotate(360deg); } }
    .loader {
      animation: spin 1.5s linear infinite;
    }
    .loader:hover,
    .loader:focus-visible {
      animation-play-state: paused;
    }

    This small touch gives users breathing room without turning off design completely.

    Progressive Enhancement: Accessibility First

    Start safe, layer on flair. Treat the reduced‑motion version as the baseline and add richer animation only if the user hasn’t opted out. This progressive‑enhancement approach prevents regressions—future devs won’t accidentally forget animation accessibility because the “accessible” state is the default.

    /* Base styles: minimal motion */
    .button {
      transition: background-color 150ms ease-in;
    }
    /* Only animate if motion is OK */
    @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference) {
      .button:hover {
        transform: translateY(-2px);
      }
    }

    You can combine media features to catch multiple needs:

    @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) and (prefers-contrast: high) {
      /* Ultra-accessible styles */
    }

    Performance & UX Benefits of Reducing Motion

    • Battery & CPU savings on low‑power devices (less layout thrashing, fewer GPU layers).
    • A cleaner interface helps all users focus on content and calls to action.
    • Lower cognitive load means faster task success—key in e‑commerce checkouts or complex forms.

    When stakeholders balk at “turning off the fun stuff,” show how reduced motion often speeds up perceived performance and increases conversions.

    Testing for Motion Accessibility

    You don’t need to eliminate all animation—you just need to know when and where it matters.

    Use Tools Like:

    • PEAT (Photosensitive Epilepsy Analysis Tool): Checks flash frequency and contrast against seizure‑safe limits.
    • WAVE: Flags continuous animations and missing pause controls.
    • Google Lighthouse: Includes audits for @prefers-reduced-motion.
    • Manual Device Testing: Turn on Reduce motion in the OS and navigate your site—does anything still move?

    Combine automated scans with human walkthroughs—especially for pages heavy on micro‑interactions. Ask testers with vestibular or cognitive disabilities for feedback if possible.

    Responsible Animation Is Good UX

    Animation accessibility isn’t about banning creativity. It’s about respecting user choice, following WCAG, and providing explicit opt‑ins or opt‑outs. When you honor @prefers-reduced-motion, add site‑level toggles, and keep flashes below seizure thresholds, you deliver the best of both worlds: engaging motion for those who love it and a calm, usable experience for those who don’t.

    Need a quick check on your motion strategy—or a deep dive into ADA compliance across your entire front end? Schedule a personalized accessibility briefing with the team at 216digital. We’ll help you uncover hidden risks, refine your animation patterns, and build inclusive experiences that look amazing and feel great for everyone.

    Let’s create motion that moves people—in the right way.

    Greg McNeil

    May 21, 2025
    How-to Guides, WCAG Compliance
    Accessibility, animation, How-to, motion, WCAG, Web Accessibility
1 2 3 … 7
Next Page
216digital Scanning Tool

Audit Your Website for Free

Find Out if Your Website is WCAG & ADA Compliant













    216digital Logo

    Our team is full of expert professionals in Web Accessibility Remediation, eCommerce Design & Development, and Marketing – ready to help you reach your goals and thrive in a competitive marketplace. 

    216 Digital, Inc. BBB Business Review

    Get in Touch

    2208 E Enterprise Pkwy
    Twinsburg, OH 44087
    216.505.4400
    info@216digital.com

    Support

    Support Desk
    Acceptable Use Policy
    Accessibility Policy
    Privacy Policy

    Web Accessibility

    Settlement & Risk Mitigation
    WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA Compliance
    Monitoring Service by a11y.Radar

    Development & Marketing

    eCommerce Development
    PPC Marketing
    Professional SEO

    About

    About Us
    Contact

    Copyright 2024 216digital. All Rights Reserved.