web development Archives /Tag

How to Identify Decorative Images for Accessibility
Images can bring a web page to life—but not all of them need to speak. When it comes to web accessibility, knowing which images are decorative and which are informative is key to creating a cleaner, smoother experience for people using screen readers and other assistive technologies. That’s where alternative text (alt text) comes in.

You probably already use alt text to describe important images. But what about the purely visual ones—those flourishes and background elements? If they don’t add value beyond appearance, they might be decorative images. This article helps you identify which images fall into that category and how to properly mark them, so screen reader users aren’t bogged down by unnecessary noise.

By focusing on even small improvements—like skipping redundant descriptions—you can build better, more respectful websites.

What Makes an Image “Decorative”?

Let’s start with the basics. According to WCAG 2.1 Success Criterion 1.1.1: Non-text Content, all meaningful non-text content must have a text alternative. But decorative images are an exception—they don’t need a description because they don’t carry meaning.

So, what exactly counts as decorative?

Common Decorative Image Types
- Borders, swirls, and flourishes that are strictly for looks
- Icons next to already-labeled buttons (like a phone icon next to the word “Call”)
- Stock photos that add mood or style but aren’t referenced in content
- Repetitive logos or design elements used as dividers or backgrounds
If removing the image doesn’t change the message or function of the page, you’re likely dealing with a decorative image.

Making the Right Call: Informative or Decorative?

It’s not always black and white. Here are a few quick questions to help:
- Does the image convey info that isn’t available in the text?
- Would a user miss out on something if the image was gone?
- Is the image part of an instructional step, chart, or link?
If you answer yes to any of these, the image is probably informative—and it needs descriptive alt text. If not, you may be safe to treat it as decorative.

For a more detailed approach, try W3C’s Alt Decision Tree. It’s a great tool, but don’t worry—no one expects you to follow it like a script. Trust your content instincts too.

Common Mistake Alert: Don’t mark company logos, charts, or instructional images as decorative. If they carry meaning or serve a function, they need proper alt text.

How to Properly Mark Decorative Images in Code

Once you’ve determined that an image is decorative, here’s how to ensure assistive technologies skip over it.

Use an Empty Alt Attribute

This is the most common and widely supported method:
```
<img src="divider.png" alt="">
```
Why does this work? A screen reader will completely ignore the image. This prevents confusion and keeps users focused on meaningful content.

But be careful: don’t skip the alt attribute altogether. Leaving it out may cause screen readers to read the file name—something like “divider-dot-p-n-g”—which is exactly the kind of noise we’re trying to eliminate.

Use role="presentation" or aria-hidden="true"

For SVGs, icons, or complex visual elements that can’t use alt="", try one of these:
```
<svg role="presentation">...</svg>
<img src="swirl.svg" aria-hidden="true">
```
What’s the Difference?
- role= "presentation" tells assistive tech: this element is just for visuals.
- aria-hidden= "true" hides the element from all assistive tech completely.
Choose one—don’t combine them with an empty alt attribute. Using both can confuse the accessibility tree and cause unpredictable results.

Best Practices & Pitfalls to Avoid

To keep your decorative images accessible:
- Use only one method to mark an image as decorative
- Test your implementation using screen reader emulators, WAVE, or Lighthouse
- Avoid using the word “decorative” in the alt text—use an empty alt attribute instead.
- Always include the alt attribute, even if it’s empty.
- Be careful not to hide meaningful images by using aria-hidden="true".
It’s also a good idea to review your CMS settings. Many platforms automatically insert images or fill alt text fields with file names. Stay alert!

Why It Matters: The Impact of Doing It Right

When you handle decorative images properly, you create a better user experience for everyone:
- Less noise for screen reader users, making it easier to navigate pages
- A clearer focus on important content and messages
- Reduced cognitive load, especially for users with visual or cognitive disabilities
- Cleaner code that’s easier to maintain and optimize
Bonus: It can even help with SEO by making your site more semantic and purposeful.

Real users have reported better experiences when extra, repetitive images are removed from their screen reader journey. It’s a small step with a big payoff.

Beyond Alt Text: Decorative Images Are Just One Part

Identifying and labeling decorative images is one part of a much larger accessibility picture. But it’s a foundational step.

Teams should regularly audit content—especially in environments where new images are often added, like blogs or e-commerce templates. Ask yourself: are new images truly meaningful, or just visual noise?

Also, remember: accessibility isn’t one person’s job. It’s a shared responsibility. Designers, devs, marketers, and content creators all play a role in making digital experiences more inclusive.

And if you’re using modern frameworks like React or Vue, be sure your components handle decorative images correctly and out of the box. A simple alt=”” on a reusable image tag can save a lot of friction.

Keep Image Accessibility Intentional

To recap: If an image is purely decorative, mark it so that screen readers skip over it. Use an empty alt="", or where needed, role= "presentation" or aria-hidden= "true". Don’t mix methods, and always test your work.

Improving how you handle decorative images might seem like a small detail, but it’s a powerful way to respect your users and refine your site’s accessibility. Thoughtful design isn’t just about how a site looks—it’s about how it feels to navigate.

Need a second pair of eyes on your accessibility implementation?

Schedule an ADA accessibility briefing with 216digital. Our experts can help you identify gaps, offer hands-on guidance, and take the guesswork out of inclusive design—so your digital experiences work better for everyone.
Greg McNeil

June 23, 2025

How-to Guides

How-to, Image Alt Text, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, web developers, web development
Build Accessibility In, Don’t Bolt It On
A brand-new website can feel polished and future-proof—right up until someone with a screen reader runs into a dead-end menu or a keyboard user can’t tab past the hero banner. Suddenly the “finished” project is back on the operating table, costing hours (and budget) you’d already spent elsewhere.

When accessibility planning is woven into the first brainstorm—alongside color palettes, user flows, and content themes—those last-minute scrambles disappear. Decisions get crisper, code stays cleaner, and every visitor, regardless of ability, enjoys the same smooth path through your pages.

Think of accessibility less as decorative trim and more as the blueprint that holds the whole structure together. Start with it, build on it, and you’ll launch faster, spend less, and welcome more people from day one.

What Does “Bolting It On” Look Like?

Many organizations treat accessibility like a retrofit. The site is already built, the design is approved, and the content is live. Only then does someone say, “Wait—what about screen reader support? What about color contrast? What if this form can’t be used with a keyboard?”

Now you’re in damage control. Fixing accessibility issues post-launch can require rewriting code, redesigning components, and delaying updates. Even worse, you may be stuck with baked-in barriers that are difficult or costly to correct. For example:
- Rebuilding menus that were designed without keyboard navigation in mind
- Rewriting interactive components that don’t support screen readers
- Replacing an entire color palette because contrast ratios fail WCAG
Accessibility planning means thinking about inclusion as you sketch wireframes, select a CMS, or build your first component. It means your developers write semantic HTML, your designers test color contrast before finalizing a palette, and your content creators write with clarity and structure.

When accessibility planning is part of the DNA of your project, you get better results—faster and with fewer surprises.

Accessibility Planning = Smart, Strategic Design

Now imagine the opposite scenario: your team is starting a new project or redesign. Right at the beginning, you ask:
- Who are our users, and what diverse needs do they have?
- Are we designing this interface to be usable without a mouse?
- Can our color and font choices work for users with low vision or dyslexia?
- Are we writing alt text for images, and using descriptive link text?
- Is this form easy to complete using assistive technology?
These questions don’t slow you down. They guide your decisions from the ground up.

Accessibility planning means thinking about inclusion as you sketch wireframes, select a CMS, or build your first component. It means your developers write semantic HTML, your designers test color contrast before finalizing a palette, and your content creators write with clarity and structure.

When accessibility is part of the DNA of your project, you get better results—faster and with fewer surprises.

6 Stages Where Accessibility Belongs

Here’s how to build accessibility into your process, stage by stage:

1. Discovery and Strategy

Before any code or design work begins, include accessibility planning as a strategic priority. Define your target users, including those with disabilities. Document accessibility goals and requirements as part of your project scope.

Make accessibility a deliverable—not an afterthought.

2. UX and Visual Design

Design with inclusivity in mind. That means:
- High contrast color palettes
- Clear visual hierarchy
- Large, legible typography
- Components that look good and function well with assistive tech
- Clear focus indicators and logical navigation
Don’t assume visual design is just aesthetics—it impacts usability for everyone.

3. Content Creation

Content creators play a major role in accessibility planning. They should:
- Use descriptive headings and meaningful subheadings
- Write clear, concise link text (“Download the annual report” instead of “Click here”)
- Provide transcripts or captions for audio and video
- Write meaningful alt text for important images
Training your content team on accessibility saves hours of rewriting down the road.

4. Front-End Development

This is where accessibility really comes alive. Developers should use:
- Semantic HTML (correct use of <nav>, <button>, <label>, etc.)
- ARIA labels only when needed—not as a shortcut for poor structure
- Keyboard operability for all interactive elements
- Logical tab order and skip navigation links
Accessibility-friendly code isn’t just better for screen readers—it’s more resilient, scalable, and SEO-friendly too.

5. Testing and QA

Accessibility testing isn’t just automated. While tools like Lighthouse, or WAVE help flag obvious issues, real users and manual testing are critical.
- Test with screen readers like NVDA or VoiceOver
- Navigate your site using only a keyboard
- Check forms for proper labels and error handling
- Test responsiveness and zoom up to 200%
Bring in users with disabilities if possible. Their feedback is irreplaceable.

6. Launch and Maintenance

Accessibility doesn’t stop at launch. It’s an ongoing effort. As you add new features or content, revisit your accessibility standards. Schedule regular audits. Monitor legal developments. Consider automated tools like a11y.Radar for early issue detection.

The Human Side of Accessibility

It’s easy to talk about accessibility in technical terms, but at its core, it’s about people.

Think about someone using a screen reader to access your site. Or someone with motor limitations who can’t use a mouse. Or someone dealing with temporary impairments—a broken wrist, eye strain, or even just a noisy environment where audio isn’t practical.

Building accessibility in from the start isn’t about compliance for its own sake. It’s about treating all users with dignity. It’s about believing that digital spaces should work for everyone, regardless of ability.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Even with good intentions, teams can fall into these traps:
- Assuming accessibility is only the developer’s job: Accessibility is a shared responsibility across design, content, and engineering.
- Waiting until the QA phase: Accessibility can’t be “tested in” at the end. It must be designed and developed.
- Relying too much on overlays or plugins: Widgets don’t fix inaccessible code. In some cases, they create more problems than they solve.
- Failing to document decisions: Keep a living accessibility checklist. It helps ensure continuity across teams and updates.
Why It Pays Off

Here’s what you gain when you build accessibility in from day one:
- Faster development: Fewer reworks, cleaner code
- Lower costs: Avoid costly redesigns and retrofits
- Happier users: Better usability for everyone, not just people with disabilities
- Improved SEO: Accessibility often overlaps with search best practices
- Reduced legal risk: Stay ahead of ADA and state-level laws like Colorado HB 21-1110
- Stronger brand reputation: Inclusion signals leadership and care
Most importantly, you build a digital presence that welcomes, respects, and serves more people exactly like the web was meant to work.

No Ifs, Ands, or Bugs—Just Accessibility Plans

Accessibility doesn’t belong on a post-launch checklist or in a future phase that never quite gets prioritized. It belongs at the table from day one—when you’re mapping out user journeys, designing components, and writing your very first lines of code.

By making accessibility planning a core part of your workflow, you avoid costly rework, improve overall quality, and create digital experiences that serve more people, more effectively. It’s not about adding more to your plate—it’s about building smarter from the start.

If you’re ready to move from fixing to future-proofing, 216digital can help. Our phased accessibility services are designed to meet you where you are, guide your team, and strengthen your site’s foundation for the long haul. Let’s make accessibility part of how you build—every time.
Greg McNeil

June 20, 2025

Testing & Remediation

Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, Accessibility testing, Web Accessibility, Web Accessibility Remediation, web development
Descriptive Page Titles for Better Accessibility
If you’ve ever had 15 tabs open at once (and let’s be honest—who hasn’t?), you know how frustrating it is to click around trying to remember which one is which. When the titles are clear, you can find what you’re looking for in a second. When they’re not, it’s a guessing game.

For users who rely on screen readers or who live with cognitive or memory challenges, vague titles aren’t just annoying. They’re a real barrier. That’s where descriptive page titles come in. They make a huge difference in helping all users navigate the web more easily, and they support your site’s overall usability and accessibility—without requiring a major overhaul.

Best of all, it’s one of the simplest changes you can make that still packs a serious punch. A good page title improves orientation, reduces confusion, boosts your SEO rankings, and even helps reduce legal risk under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). All with a few well-chosen words.

What WCAG 2.4.2 Actually Requires

Under WCAG 2.4.2—a Level A requirement in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)—every web page must have a title that clearly describes its topic or purpose. It’s one of the most fundamental accessibility requirements, but it’s also one of the most overlooked.

Simply having a <title> tag isn’t enough. What’s inside that tag matters. A vague or generic title—like “Home” or “Untitled”—does little to help users understand what the page is actually about. It’s a bit like labeling all your folders “Stuff”—no one can navigate that efficiently, especially not users relying on assistive technologies.

This is especially important for screen reader users. Page titles are often read aloud as soon as a page loads or when switching between browser tabs. That brief moment of context helps them know exactly where they are. Similarly, sighted users benefit from meaningful titles when scanning through multiple open tabs or saving bookmarks for later reference.

Who Benefits from Descriptive Page Titles?

The short answer? Everyone. But here’s how it really plays out for different types of users:
- Screen reader users hear the page title as their first introduction. A vague or incorrect title can throw them off or force them to dig deeper than necessary.
- People with cognitive or memory challenges rely on titles to quickly understand whether a page is relevant. A well-written title can prevent information overload and reduce frustration.
- Mobility-impaired users benefit because they can avoid unnecessary clicks or key presses if the title tells them they’re on the wrong page.
- Everyone else—yes, even those without disabilities—appreciates descriptive page titles for the sheer convenience. Clear titles make it easier to navigate tabs, scan bookmarks, and share links confidently.
When a title says exactly what a page delivers, no one has to guess. That’s good usability—and that’s what accessibility is really about.

Common Title Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)

Even with the best intentions, many websites still fall into title traps. Let’s look at a few common problems:
- Too Vague: Titles like “Home” or “Blog” don’t help much when you’re trying to tell one tab from another.
- Reused Titles: When every blog post or account page is titled the same—like “Monthly Statement”—users lose their place quickly.
- Doesn’t Match the Page: If your title says “Pricing,” but the page is about features or FAQs, that mismatch causes confusion.
- Overloaded for SEO: You’ve seen these: “Best Home Trim Vinyl Windows Outdoor Accessories 2025 Guide.” They’re trying to do too much and end up helping no one.
Better Examples

Consider replacing generic titles with more descriptive ones. For example, swap “Blog Post” with “How to Write Descriptive Page Titles.” You might also change “Services” to “Real World Accessibility | 216digital,” or “Contact” to “Contact Us – 216digital Web Team.”

These small edits bring clarity, build trust, and boost both accessibility and SEO

Accessibility and SEO: They Work Together

There’s a common myth that writing for accessibility hurts SEO—but that couldn’t be further from the truth. In fact, descriptive page titles are a perfect example of how accessibility and SEO can work in harmony.

Search engines love pages with relevant, concise, and unique titles. So do people. That means when you follow accessibility best practices, you’re also improving your site’s visibility and user engagement.

Tips for Great Titles
- Keep them between 30–60 characters so they don’t get cut off in search results or browser tabs.
- Use primary keywords naturally, not awkwardly.
- Try using a pattern like: [Page Topic] | [Brand Name].
So, “About” becomes “About Our Team | 216digital” and “Pricing” becomes “Website Accessibility Pricing | 216digital.”

It’s easy to see how small tweaks can have a big payoff.

How to Improve Your Titles—Step by Step

Here’s a quick plan to help you get your titles in shape:

Audit Your Site

Use automated tools to spot missing, duplicate, or unusually long titles. But don’t stop there—manual review is key to catching vague or misleading language that tools might miss.

Apply a Simple Template

Keep it consistent across your site: “[Page Topic] | [Brand]” works for most needs and helps build recognition.

Loop in Your Team

Content creators, developers, designers, and SEO specialists should all care about good descriptive page titles. Make it a shared goal—not an afterthought.

Add it to Your Checklist

Whether you’re launching a new blog post, updating a product page, or doing a site redesign, reviewing the title tag should be part of the process every time.

The Risks of Getting It Wrong

Ignoring this part of accessibility can lead to bigger problems. WCAG 2.4.2 is part of ADA compliance, and missing or misleading titles are often among the first things flagged in accessibility audits. If you’re not in compliance, you could be vulnerable to lawsuits—and nobody wants that.

But beyond legal risk, failing to use descriptive page titles sends the wrong message. It suggests your site wasn’t built with every user in mind. And that hurts brand trust more than you might think.

Final Thoughts: Titles That Work for Everyone

It’s easy to overlook something as small as a page title. But when you take a step back, you’ll see that descriptive page titles affect every part of your site—from how users find you, to how they feel while browsing, to whether they come back at all.

This one fix can make your site more usable, more discoverable, and more inclusive—without blowing up your workflow or budget. That’s what we call a smart move.

Ready to Take Action?

Want help reviewing your site for accessibility wins like this one? Schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital. We’ll show you how small changes like descriptive page titles can lead to big improvements in compliance, usability, and user trust—no pressure, no hard sell.

Let’s build a web that works for everyone—starting with the title.
Greg McNeil

June 18, 2025

How-to Guides

Accessibility, How-to, Page Titles, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, Web Accessibility, web developers, web development, Website Accessibility
WordPress Accessibility: Common Pitfalls & Fixes
WordPress gives developers a head start with accessibility—but it’s just that: a start. While the platform includes solid foundations like semantic markup and keyboard-friendly admin features, building an experience that works for everyone still requires thoughtful decisions on our part. As developers, we’re in a unique position to go beyond the basics, spotting the small oversights that can create big barriers for users.

In this guide, we’ll walk through some of the most common accessibility missteps we see in WordPress projects—along with practical fixes you can implement right away. Whether you’re refactoring an old theme or launching something new, these insights are meant to help you create experiences that are not just compliant, but genuinely inclusive.

Misuse of Heading Structures for Visual Styling

It’s easy to reach for <h2> or <h3> tags to style text because they’re built into most WordPress themes with bold and larger font sizes. But when headings are used purely for visual emphasis—not structure—you end up distorting the page’s semantic outline.

Why It Matters

Screen reader users often rely on heading navigation to scan and jump between sections. If headings are skipped, out of order, or misused, the page becomes harder to understand, and key content may get missed entirely.

How to Fix It
- Use CSS for Styling: Apply styles using classes or inline styles, not heading tags. In Gutenberg, you can use blocks with custom styles or reusable blocks instead of jumping heading levels.
- Follow a Logical Heading Hierarchy: Begin with one <h1> per page (usually the title), then use <h2> for top-level sections, <h3> for subsections, and so on.
- Audit Your Work: Use tools like WAVE or the Google Lighthouse Accessibility Report to evaluate your heading structure and flag potential misuses before they go live.
Overreliance on Theme Defaults for Color Contrast

Many developers trust their WordPress theme’s default color scheme to do the heavy lifting—but while a palette may look good visually, it doesn’t mean it’s accessible. Default colors often fail to meetWCAG 2.1 AA standards, especially for body text and buttons.

Accessibility Risk

Poor color contrast is a major barrier for users with low vision or color blindness. If your text blends into the background, you’re excluding readers—sometimes without realizing it.

Practical Fixes
- Test Contrast Ratios: Use WebAIM’s Contrast Checker or the Color Contrast Analyzer to validate text against its background.
- Override Theme Defaults: Most modern themes offer customization options via the Customizer or Full Site Editing. Make small adjustments—lighten text, darken backgrounds—to meet or exceed the 4.5:1 minimum contrast ratio.
- Offer User Controls: Consider giving users the ability to switch to high-contrast mode with plugins like “WP Accessibility.” This gives more control to your users while improving inclusivity.
Improper List Markup Practices

It’s not unusual to see developers create the appearance of a list using <div> tags, line breaks, or other non-semantic methods—especially in custom blocks or page builders commonly used in WordPress.

Why It’s a Problem

Screen readers rely on semantic tags like <ul>, <ol>, and <li> to announce that a list exists, how many items are in it, and how items relate to each other. Without this structure, users lose context.

Best Practices
- Use Native List Markup: If it’s a list—code it as a list. Use <ul> for unordered lists and <ol> for ordered ones. Wrap each list item in <li>.
- Handle Nesting Thoughtfully: For sub-lists, nest another <ul> or <ol> inside an <li>. Screen readers will announce the nested structure properly.
- Test Your Output: Run accessibility audits or inspect the DOM to ensure list structures are coded semantically, especially when using custom Gutenberg blocks or page builders.
Neglecting Contextual Relevance in Alt Text

WordPress auto-generates alt text from image file names if authors don’t supply one. That’s how you end up with images labeled “IMG_4829.jpg”—which isn’t helpful to anyone.

Why It Matters

Alt text should describe why the image is there, not just what it looks like. If the image provides important context, instructions, or emotion, a generic label fails users who rely on screen readers.

What Developers Can Do
- Write Purpose-Driven Alt Text: If the image is showing a concept, outcome, or step in a process, describe that context directly. For example, “Screenshot of the plugin settings menu with Accessibility Mode enabled.”
- Avoid Phrases Like “Image of…” Screen readers already announce the presence of an image. Jump straight into the relevant description.
- Use Empty Alt for Decorative Images: For visuals that are purely aesthetic and add no informational value, use alt="" so assistive tech knows to skip it entirely.
Overuse and Misapplication of ARIA Attributes

ARIA is a powerful toolset—but like any tool, misuse can cause more harm than good. Adding roles and attributes without understanding their implications can break screen reader behavior or clutter the accessibility tree.

The Real Cost

Improper ARIA use can confuse assistive technologies, interfere with default behaviors, and even make components harder—not easier—to use. Overengineering is just as dangerous as under-engineering.

Smarter ARIA Use
- Favor Native HTML First: If you’re building a checkbox, <input type="checkbox"> with an associated <label> is far more reliable than using a <div> with ARIA roles and states.
- Use ARIA Only When Required: If you’re building a custom interactive widget (like a tabbed interface or menu), consult the ARIA Authoring Practices Guide. Choose correct roles and manage keyboard interactions accordingly.
- Test Your Implementation: Use screen readers like NVDA or VoiceOver to verify that ARIA is behaving as expected. Pay attention to focus, announcements, and interaction patterns.
Overlooking Keyboard Navigation and Focus Management

Many developers unintentionally design for mouse users first. But for users relying on keyboards—whether due to preference, disability, or temporary injury—keyboard accessibility is critical.

Key Accessibility Concerns
- No Visible Focus Indicators: Removing browser outlines with outline: none; without providing alternatives leaves users lost.
- Custom Components Not Keyboard-Aware: Modals, sliders, dropdowns, and carousels built from scratch often lack proper keyboard event handling and focus management.
Developer-Friendly Fixes
- Ensure Focus Visibility: Style focused elements clearly using CSS, like :focus { outline: 2px solid #000; }. Customize this to match your theme, but don’t remove it entirely.
- Handle Keyboard Events: For custom components, add keydown or keyup listeners to handle Enter, Escape, and Arrow keys appropriately. Don’t rely on click events alone.
- Do Keyboard-Only Testing: Regularly test your site using only the keyboard. Tab through each interactive element and verify focus moves logically, without skipping important controls.
What True Accessibility Looks Like in WordPress

Accessibility isn’t a checklist—it’s a mindset. When we write clean, semantic code, ensure visual clarity, and support every way a user might interact with our sites, we’re not just doing right by WCAG—we’re doing right by our users. The real goal is to build experiences that work for everyone, without assumptions about how people navigate the web.

As WordPress developers, we have powerful tools and a vibrant ecosystem at our disposal. Let’s use them with care and intention. Keep testing, stay curious, and don’t hesitate to dig deeper. And if you’re looking to strengthen your accessibility efforts, 216digital offers ADA compliance briefings tailored to development teams. We’re here to support your work—because inclusive development is better development.
Greg McNeil

June 10, 2025

How-to Guides, Legal Compliance

Accessibility, How-to, WCAG, Web Accessibility, web developers, web development, Website Accessibility, WordPress
Up and Coming ARIA Implementation
Web accessibility is always evolving. Keeping up isn’t just beneficial—it’s crucial. Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) help developers build experiences that are usable by everyone, especially those with disabilities. As web standards advance, new ARIA attributes and roles emerge. Recently, ARIA 1.3 has introduced several notable features developers should start adopting now.

Many of these are still in what could be called the “infrastructure stage”—they’re well-defined and available, but support across assistive tech and browsers remains inconsistent. That’s precisely why now is the time to pay attention. Understanding emerging ARIA implementation ensures your projects remain inclusive, user-friendly, and future-proof.

This article explores fresh ARIA implementation options, their current support levels, and how developers can practically integrate them into real-world workflows.

New and Noteworthy ARIA Attributes

aria-errormessage

Effective error messaging can significantly enhance usability. The ARIA implementation of aria-errormessage connects specific error messages to input fields when aria-invalid="true" is active. Unlike aria-describedby, this explicitly identifies the message as an error, and it’s only announced when the field is invalid—streamlining feedback for screen reader users.

Support: Strong across JAWS, NVDA, and iOS VoiceOver. More limited in other environments.

Example
```
<label for="email">Email:</label>
<input type="email" id="email" aria-invalid="true" aria-errormessage="emailError">
<span id="emailError">Please enter a valid email address.</span>
```
aria-description

This attribute supplements existing descriptive labels by offering additional, programmatically available context that isn’t always visible on screen. It’s ideal for providing hints that enhance usability without cluttering the UI. For example, use aria-description="You are here:" to add orientation to breadcrumb navigation.

Support: Currently handled well by NVDA and iOS VoiceOver; other screen readers may ignore it or misinterpret its purpose.

Example
```
<button aria-label="Download" aria-description="Downloads the current report in PDF format.">Download</button>
```
aria-details

The ARIA implementation of aria-details links an element to rich, supplementary content—replacing the outdated and poorly supported longdesc. It’s perfect for enhancing understanding of charts, data tables, and complex graphics.

Support: Announced in some screen readers, but there’s currently no direct navigation path from the referenced element to the details content—limiting usability in production environments.

Example
```
<img src="chart.png" alt="Sales Chart" aria-details="chartDetails">
<div id="chartDetails">
  <p>This chart shows sales data from Q1 to Q4, highlighting growth trends.</p>
</div>
```
aria-keyshortcuts

Keyboard accessibility remains critical for many users. The ARIA implementation of aria-keyshortcuts lets developers document expected key commands directly in markup, making interfaces easier to learn and navigate via screen readers.

Important note: This does not create functionality—it simply advertises the shortcut to assistive tech.

Support: Fairly robust in Chrome and Edge; less so in Firefox and mobile platforms.

Example
```
<button aria-label="Mute" aria-keyshortcuts="Ctrl+M">Mute</button>
```
aria-placeholder

This attribute serves as a screen-reader-friendly version of the native placeholder attribute, particularly useful for custom form controls like div[contenteditable]. Unlike native placeholders, the text won’t be announced after the field is filled, avoiding redundancy.

Support: Surprisingly consistent across JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, and TalkBack.

Example
```
<div contenteditable="true" role="textbox" aria-placeholder="Enter your comment here..."></div>
```
Emerging ARIA Roles Enhancing Semantic Meaning

Editorial and Collaborative Roles

Roles like role="mark", role="comment", and role="suggestion" provide semantic meaning in collaborative environments—useful in rich text editors, document workflows, and feedback tools.
- mark: Highlights text.
- comment: Marks feedback or user-generated discussion.
- suggestion: Flags proposed edits or changes.
Support: Varies widely. role="mark" is gaining traction due to its alignment with <mark>. Others are still emerging.

Example
```
<p>The final decision was <span role="suggestion">to postpone the launch</span> until next quarter.</p>
```
Technical and Temporal Roles

New semantic roles such as role="code" and role="time" help describe technical or time-based content when native elements like <code> or <time> aren’t feasible—particularly in component-based frameworks.

Support: Minimal at present but useful for long-term semantic clarity.

Example
```
<div role="code">const sum = (a, b) => a + b;</div>
<div role="time" datetime="2025-06-06T13:49:19-04:00">June 6, 2025, 1:49 PM EDT</div>
```
role=”image”

This is functionally equivalent to role="img" but offers a clearer, natural-language alternative. While it doesn’t change behavior, it can improve code readability and naming consistency across projects.

Example
```
<div role="image" aria-label="Company Logo">
  <img src="logo.png" alt="">
</div>
```
Practical Implementation Considerations

Assessing Support Across Assistive Technologies

Not every ARIA implementation feature enjoys uniform support. The ecosystem includes screen readers like JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver, TalkBack, and browsers like Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Safari. Always test your ARIA implementations across a matrix of platforms and devices. What works well in one may fail silently in another.

Tested Environments (May 2025)
- Windows 11: JAWS, NVDA, Narrator
- macOS Sequoia: VoiceOver
- iOS 18.4: VoiceOver (Safari)
- Android 15: TalkBack (Chrome)
Support varies—stay informed and test often.

Best Practices for Adoption
1. Use semantic HTML first. ARIA should enhance—not replace—native elements.
2. Progressively enhance. Build baseline functionality, then layer in ARIA attributes where they add real value.
3. Test with real users. Automated tests only go so far. Gather feedback from people who use assistive tech every day.
4. Implement gracefully. Ensure content degrades without breaking if ARIA features aren’t supported.
5. Stay proactive. Keep track of ARIA spec updates and screen reader changelogs.
Conclusion

Web accessibility isn’t static. Staying ahead of emerging ARIA implementation trends helps developers build experiences that are not just compliant, but genuinely inclusive. Attributes like aria-errormessage, aria-description, and editorial roles like role="comment" signal the future of accessible interaction.

Many of these features may still be waiting for widespread support—but early adoption by thoughtful developers will shape best practices and standards moving forward.

To lead with confidence in this evolving space, consider scheduling an ADA briefing with 216digital. Their accessibility experts can help you implement forward-looking ARIA features in a way that’s both robust and user-first—positioning your organization as a leader in inclusive design.
Greg McNeil

June 6, 2025

How-to Guides

Accessibility, ARIA, How-to, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, web developers, web development
ARIA Alert 101: Loud, Clear, and Accessible
If you’ve built interactive web apps, you know how crucial timely feedback is for a good user experience. But here’s something developers often overlook: what about users who rely on assistive technologies like screen readers? For them, getting real-time notifications isn’t just convenient—it’s essential. That’s exactly why understanding how to use an ARIA alert matters.

This guide breaks down what ARIA alerts are, how they work, where they shine, and how to implement them correctly—without overwhelming users or creating redundant announcements.

What Exactly Is an ARIA Alert?

An ARIA alert is your app’s way of tapping a screen reader user on the shoulder. By using role="alert", you’re signaling that the content inside that element is critical and should be announced immediately—without needing to move focus or interaction.

Technically, role="alert" behaves the same as setting aria-live="assertive" and aria-atomic="true". That means:
- The content update will be read aloud right away.
- The entire updated region will be announced, not just the changed portion.
Use it when urgency matters—like an error message or a warning about a session timeout.

How ARIA Alerts Actually Work (And Why They Can Be Tricky)

For an ARIA alert to trigger, it must announce a change. If you statically load a message with no updates, nothing will happen—even if you’ve assigned role="alert".

Here’s the trick: the alert container must exist in the DOM when the page loads, and its content must change dynamically. You can do this by:
- Inserting new text into the container.
- Revealing text that was previously hidden with CSS (e.g., display: none → display: block).
A reliable pattern is to preload an empty alert container, then inject or unhide content as needed. This ensures assistive tech is “watching” the region.

Real-World Scenarios for Using ARIA Alerts

Let’s look at some common, effective use cases:
- Form validation: “Oops! Please enter a valid email.”
- Session timeouts: “You’ll be logged out in 1 minute.”
- Connection issues: “Unable to save changes—check your connection.”
Here’s an updated practical implementation using best practices:
```
<div role="alert" aria-live="assertive" aria-atomic="true" id="email-alert"></div>
<form id="contactForm">
  <label for="email">Email:</label>
  <input type="email" id="email-input" placeholder="Enter email">
  <button type="submit" onclick="validateEmail(event)">Submit</button>
</form>
<script>
function validateEmail(event) {
  event.preventDefault();
  const email = document.getElementById('email-input').value;
  const alertBox = document.getElementById('email-alert');
  alertBox.textContent = ''; // Clear previous message
  if (!email.includes('@')) {
    // Trigger update
    alertBox.textContent = 'Please provide a valid email address.';
  }
}
</script>
```
Pro tip: Clearing the alert content first helps some screen readers recognize the change reliably.

alert vs. alertdialog: Know the Difference

Use role="alert" for passive, immediate notifications that require no interaction. But if your message needs a user response—like confirming an action or acknowledging a warning—role="alertdialog" is a better fit.

It shifts focus into the alert and keeps the user there until they respond—perfect for time-sensitive prompts.

When Another Role Fits Better

ARIA alerts aren’t the only live region role. Use the right tool for the right job:
- Use role="status" for passive, non-urgent updates, such as “Settings saved.”
- When presenting chat logs or continuously updating feeds, apply role="log".
- Countdowns or ticking clocks are best served with role="timer".
- For moving text like stock tickers or news crawls, assign role="marquee".
This prevents alert fatigue and keeps your UI meaningful and calm.

Best Practices for ARIA Alerts

To ensure your ARIA alert implementation actually helps users, keep these principles in mind:
- Avoid using aria-live="assertive" on top of role="alert" — it’s redundant and may cause double announcements.
- Don’t assign role="alert" to the trigger (like a button); apply it to the message container.
- Avoid focusing the alert — screen readers will announce it automatically.
- Leave the container empty at first — content must be injected or toggled dynamically to trigger an announcement.
Here’s an example using a hidden alert message:
```
<div role="alert">
  <span id="error-message" style="display:none; color:red;">Please provide a valid email address.</span>
</div>
<script>
function submitForm(event) {
  event.preventDefault();
  const emailField = document.getElementById('email');
  const errorMessage = document.getElementById('error-message');
  if (!emailField.value || !emailField.value.includes('@')) {
    errorMessage.style.display = 'block';
  } else {
    errorMessage.style.display = 'none';
    alert('Form submitted successfully');
  }
}
</script>
```
Common Pitfalls (and How to Fix Them)
- Too many alerts: It’s tempting to ARIA-ify everything, but overusing alerts overwhelms users. Use sparingly and meaningfully.
- Alerts that vanish too quickly: Follow WCAG 2.2.3 (AAA) recommendations and give users enough time to absorb information—especially at slower screen reader speeds.
- Missing initial DOM presence: Screen readers may not monitor the alert region if developers add it after the page loads and it wasn’t in the initial DOM.
- Static content: No matter the role, alerts only fire when content updates. Don’t forget to trigger a change—whether inserting, revealing, or replacing content.
Advanced Tips to Polish Your ARIA Alerts

Reuse One Container

Don’t overcomplicate things with multiple regions. Instead, keep a single reusable alert container:
```
const alertContainer = document.getElementById('reusable-alert');
alertContainer.textContent = '';
setTimeout(() => {
  alertContainer.textContent = 'Your session will expire soon!';
}, 50);
```
The slight delay ensures screen readers detect the change.

Hidden Alerts for Assistive Tech Only

Sometimes, users with screen readers need information that sighted users don’t. You can use visually hidden alerts to serve that audience without affecting your UI:
```
<div role="alert" class="visually-hidden">
  Background task completed successfully.
</div>
```
This preserves visual clarity while maintaining inclusivity.

Testing: Manual Beats Automated

While tools like Lighthouse are helpful, automated testing can’t catch everything. To verify ARIA alert functionality:
- Use screen readers directly (NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver).
- Test updates dynamically—don’t rely on static behavior.
- Confirm timing, visibility, and repeatability.
Get feedback from real users whenever possible.

Make Critical Updates Count With ARIA Alerts

An ARIA alert isn’t just a technical fix—it’s a way to respect your users’ need for timely, clear communication. When implemented well, it’s like adding a layer of empathy to your UI. You’re saying, “Hey, I’ve got your back—even if you can’t see what’s on the screen.”

If you’re unsure whether your alerts are firing at the right moments—or want expert help ensuring your digital experience is accessible—connect with the team at 216digital. We offer accessibility audits, developer guidance, and hands-on remediation services tailored to your site.

Let’s make accessibility loud, clear, and effective—together.
Greg McNeil

June 5, 2025

How-to Guides

Accessibility, ARIA, ARIA alert, How-to, web developers, web development, Website Accessibility
Is WCAG Certification Possible?
Many businesses are on the hunt for something called “WCAG certification”—a stamp of approval to show their site is accessible. But is that even a real thing?

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) are the widely accepted standard for creating accessible digital content. These guidelines help ensure websites, apps, and digital tools work for everyone—including people with disabilities. But here’s the catch: there’s no such thing as official WCAG certification. That doesn’t mean you’re out of luck, though.

In this article, we’ll unpack what WCAG really is, why it matters, and what practical steps you can take to prove your accessibility commitment—without chasing a non-existent certificate.

What Is WCAG — and Why It Matters

WCAG is a set of accessibility guidelines created by a group called the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). It’s been updated over the years—versions 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 are already in use, and a new draft version (WCAG 3.0) is in the works.

The guidelines are built on four main principles:
- Perceivable: Can people see, hear, or otherwise access your content?
- Operable: Can users interact with it, like using a keyboard or voice commands?
- Understandable: Is your site’s content and layout easy to follow?
- Robust: Will your site work across different devices, browsers, and assistive tech?
These principles help you build a better experience for everyone. And with around 1 in 4 Americans living with a disability, accessibility isn’t a niche issue—it’s a core part of serving your audience.

Can You Get WCAG Certified? (No — and Here’s Why)

Let’s make it simple: WCAG certification does not exist in any official form. The W3C—the organization behind WCAG—doesn’t issue certificates to websites or developers. So if someone tells you they can give you a WCAG certificate, that’s a red flag.

Here’s what does exist:
- WCAG Conformance: This means your website meets specific WCAG success criteria.
- Audit Reports: Accessibility experts can review your site and document its strengths and weaknesses.
- Professional Credentials: Individuals can take training and exams to show they understand accessibility standards.
What you can’t get is an “official” WCAG certification from any governing body. The W3C has actually decided not to create a certification program at all, stating that a formal seal could do more harm than good. So any so-called “WCAG certificate” should be treated carefully—think of it more as “we followed WCAG and have evidence” rather than a license or badge.

Why the Idea of Certification Still Matters

Even though WCAG certification isn’t real, the need to show good faith—especially during legal challenges—is very real.

If your site faces an ADA accessibility complaint, a detailed audit report or a public accessibility statement can help. It won’t guarantee immunity, but it may:
- Shorten legal negotiations
- Lower settlement demands
- Show that you’re actively working on improvements
Most lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) focus on fixing the problem (not financial damages at the federal level), but state laws like California’s Unruh Act can make things much more expensive. In some cases, businesses may face penalties of $4,000 per violation—per user session.

Many businesses choose to settle accessibility lawsuits rather than fight in court, with settlements typically ranging from $5,000 to $20,000, and sometimes far more. Proactively documenting your WCAG conformance can reduce those risks and costs.

What You Can Get Instead: Real Accessibility Certifications

While your website can’t be WCAG certified, you or your team can earn credentials that demonstrate knowledge of WCAG and broader accessibility concepts. These are well-respected in the field:
- CPACC – Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies
  Great for content creators, marketers, and generalists. Covers topics like disability types, legal basics, and WCAG principles.
- WAS – Web Accessibility Specialist
  Tailored for developers and UX designers. Dives deep into the technical side: semantic HTML, ARIA, testing practices.
- CPWA – Certified Professional in Web Accessibility
  Combines both CPACC and WAS certifications. Ideal for accessibility leads or those overseeing compliance efforts.
These certifications don’t claim to be WCAG certification, but they do show your commitment to accessibility expertise.

Real Accessibility Is About Practical Action

Certifications help—but they’re not a shortcut. To build and maintain an accessible site, focus on practical, ongoing steps that create real impact.

Run Regular Accessibility Audits

You can use tools like WAVE or Lighthouse, but manual testing is essential too. Look for issues like missing labels, broken keyboard navigation, or poor heading structure. Save your reports as documentation in case questions arise later.

Fix High-Impact Issues First

Some problems—like missing alt text or contrast issues—pose bigger risks than others. Prioritize known trouble spots.

Bake Accessibility Into Development

Make accessibility part of your everyday workflow, not something you tackle at the end. Small habits make a big difference.

Publish a Public Statement

Adding an accessibility statement to your website builds trust and shows you’re being transparent and proactive.

Train Your Content Team

Every upload matters. A well-meaning update can unintentionally introduce accessibility problems—so make sure everyone’s equipped to do their part.

Should You Be Chasing WCAG Certification?

Not exactly. The smarter question is: how do you prove that your site meets WCAG standards?

Here’s how to show your work:
- Encourage team members to earn real accessibility credentials like CPACC or WAS.
- Hire an expert to audit your site and issue a detailed report.
- Post an accessibility statement on your site that outlines your efforts and future plans.
- Monitor your site and run regular checks to ensure improvements are sustained.
And remember: legal risk is growing. Thousands of lawsuits were filed in the past year alone over inaccessible websites. Many target websites that lack basic WCAG conformance.

Accessibility Partners Can Make the Difference

Trying to juggle deadlines, legacy code, and legal exposure? Outside help can give you the lift you need. Experienced accessibility partners don’t just run audits—they help you build a sustainable, legally defensible program.

What expert partners can offer:
- Full audits, including real-user testing
- Help fixing accessibility issues
- Ongoing monitoring to catch new problems
- Role-specific training for devs, designers, and content teams
And a key difference? The right partner will never promise fake WCAG certification. They’ll help you build real results.

You Don’t Need a WCAG Certificate—You Need a Plan

The idea of WCAG certification sounds comforting—but it’s not real. What is real? Earning your users’ trust by making your site work for everyone.

When you show that you’ve taken the right steps—training, audits, public transparency—you don’t need a certificate. You’ve already proven your commitment.

Ready to show your commitment to accessibility the right way?
Schedule an ADA accessibility briefing with 216digital and see how we help teams maintain long-term WCAG conformance and build more inclusive digital experiences.
Greg McNeil

May 14, 2025

Web Accessibility Training

Accessibility, WCAG, WCAG Certification, WCAG Compliance, Web Accessibility, web developers, web development
Don’t Be Fooled by False Positives in Accessibility
Imagine you’re scanning through an accessibility report when it flags a purely decorative image for missing alt text. You pause and double-check the code—aria-hidden= "true" is clearly set—yet the tool insists it’s an issue. In moments like these, you’re dealing with false positives.

When left unchecked, false positives can waste hours of development time, drain your budget, and leave real accessibility problems hidden beneath noise. For developers who regularly rely on automated accessibility testing, learning to recognize and reduce these inaccuracies is as essential as fixing actual accessibility barriers.

What a False Positive Really Is

Simply put, false positives occur when a testing tool incorrectly marks compliant content as inaccessible, even though it aligns perfectly with standards like WCAG. These mistaken alerts often create confusion and lead teams to fix things that aren’t broken—sometimes at the expense of overlooking real issues.

So, why do they happen? Usually, false positives stem from three common causes:
- Limited context: Automated tools understand code but not intent. Elements involving dynamic JavaScript or custom user settings can confuse them, triggering inaccurate alerts. For example, a modal loaded via JavaScript might be marked as inaccessible until it’s fully rendered, even if it meets all WCAG requirements when interactive.
- Overly cautious rules: Some tools are intentionally strict, flagging anything remotely questionable to avoid missing genuine issues. While well-intentioned, this can lead to excessive alerts. Developers end up treating these tools like overprotective smoke alarms—loud, constant, and sometimes hard to trust.
- Varied coding practices: Custom components or unconventional markup patterns, common in modern front-end workflows, often mislead algorithms expecting textbook HTML. Accessibility implemented through ARIA roles or JavaScript event handlers may trip up tools that expect static HTML structures.
Most developers have encountered these scenarios in practice: decorative icons labeled as “critical issues,” contrast alerts ignoring user-selected dark modes, or dynamic form elements incorrectly flagged for missing labels. Each instance represents the broader problem—tools missing the bigger picture.

The Hidden Costs of False Positives

When false positives become part of your day-to-day workflow, the cost isn’t just inconvenience—it’s real impact on time, trust, and outcomes.

Time and Budget Drain

Chasing down false positives can quickly become a costly distraction. Imagine your team spends hours rewriting alt text for images that never needed it. Those same resources could have resolved genuine issues or shipped new features, improving your product instead of spinning its wheels. For larger teams or enterprise projects, these hours quickly compound into days—adding up to measurable delays in delivery and inflated budgets.

This resource drain can be particularly painful during audits or compliance deadlines when teams are working under pressure. Every misfire takes attention away from what truly matters: building inclusive digital experiences for real users.

Erosion of Trust in Tools

Repeated inaccurate alerts erode confidence in accessibility tools. Developers may grow skeptical, dismissing genuine issues as “probably another false positive.” This skepticism can cause real accessibility problems to slip through unnoticed, undermining the very purpose of using these tools.

Once the trust is gone, so is the motivation to use these tools proactively. Instead of integrating accessibility checks early and often, teams may push them off to the final stages—or abandon them altogether. That’s a slippery slope that compromises both compliance and user experience.

Legal and Reputational Risks

Perhaps most serious of all, excessive false positives can mask true accessibility problems. If your team assumes a website is compliant based on misleading tool reports, users could face unexpected barriers. That scenario leaves your organization vulnerable to lawsuits, fines, and damage to brand reputation.

It’s a dangerous combination: a dashboard showing 100% compliance while screen reader users struggle to navigate key interactions. In the worst-case scenario, this could lead to legal action under ADA, Section 508, or similar laws depending on your location or industry.

Practical Steps to Minimize False Positives

It’s not about choosing between automation and accuracy—it’s about striking a balance. Here are a few strategies that can help:

Choose Tools Carefully

Accuracy is crucial. Opt for tools known to minimize false positives—look at reviews, user communities, and real-world feedback. Tools that offer detailed explanations for each issue help developers evaluate the context instead of blindly applying changes. Bonus points for tools that integrate smoothly into your CI/CD pipeline or Git workflows, allowing developers to spot and triage issues earlier in the process.

Combine Automated Testing with Manual Checks

Automation is valuable, but humans bring the necessary context. Regular manual reviews, particularly with real assistive technologies like screen readers or keyboard-only navigation, confirm whether flagged issues are real or simply more false positives. This human element provides critical insights into actual user experiences that no machine can replicate on its own.

Pairing automated scans with periodic expert reviews ensures you don’t end up trusting the scanner more than the people you’re building for.

Educate and Empower Your Team

Providing training ensures everyone knows what a genuine accessibility issue looks like. Regular team briefings, quick reference guides, or lunch-and-learn sessions can equip developers and QA specialists to confidently distinguish true issues from false positives during daily workflows.

It also helps to document commonly misflagged elements in your internal dev wiki or design system docs. That way, developers don’t waste time rediscovering the same conclusions again and again.

Shift Accessibility Testing Left

Accessibility testing should be a routine practice, integrated into every development phase—right alongside linting, unit testing, and code reviews. Early checks catch issues and limit the spread of false positives throughout your codebase.

This shift-left approach reduces last-minute panic before launches and promotes a culture where accessibility is part of the conversation from the start. Teams that embed these habits often find they’re able to respond to flagged issues faster and with greater confidence.

Engage Accessibility Specialists

Sometimes, complex implementations or large-scale projects need specialized insight. Accessibility experts can fine-tune automated testing parameters, spot challenging edge cases, and provide tailored recommendations. Their guidance helps reduce false positives and sets your project on a sustainable path forward.

Even a short-term partnership or audit can clarify which alerts deserve attention and which are tool-generated noise. Think of it like calling in an electrician to check wiring behind the walls—some things are better seen with trained eyes.

A True Positive Path Forward

False positives in accessibility testing aren’t just minor annoyances—they cost valuable resources, erode trust, and potentially expose your site to compliance risks. Left unchecked, they can derail good intentions and cause more confusion than clarity. But with the right balance of tools, process, and people, they don’t have to.

Start by picking better tools, pairing them with manual validation, and investing in your team’s knowledge. Make accessibility part of your workflow—not just a checkbox at the end. And when needed, bring in expert support to cut through the noise.

Want to take your accessibility efforts to the next level? Schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital. Our team will help you build a sustainable, practical strategy for achieving real-world accessibility and staying ahead of compliance requirements.
Greg McNeil

May 13, 2025

Testing & Remediation

Accessibility, Accessibility Remediation, false positives, Web Accessibility Remediation, web developers, web development, Website Accessibility
aria-label vs aria-labelledby: When and How to Use Each
As developers, we know every interactive element—buttons, dialogs, inputs—needs an accessible name. Good semantic HTML handles this automatically. But let’s face it, our apps get complicated. Sometimes, buttons only show icons, dialogs pull their titles from external components, or complex widgets break the neat semantic model. That’s where ARIA attributes come in. Specifically, aria-label and aria-labelledby help us provide clear,

screen-reader-friendly names. But they aren’t interchangeable. Knowing when to use each can save you debugging headaches down the line.

The Common Ground

First off, let’s review their similarities. Both aria-label and aria-labelledby override native labels provided by HTML. Both directly influence what assistive technologies like screen readers announce. Ideally, though, these ARIA attributes should be your fallback, not the go-to solution—semantic HTML labels are always best.

Quick side note: If you’re ever curious about the details, check out the Accessible Name Computation Algorithm.

Using aria-label: Direct and Hidden

aria-label lets you set an accessible name directly with a string—no extra DOM needed. Here’s a simple example you’ve probably seen before:
```
<button aria-label="Search">
  <svg aria-hidden="true" focusable="false">...</svg>
</button>
```
Perfect for icon buttons or elements that don’t have visible labels. But there’s a catch:
- It’s invisible to sighted users. If your visual UI doesn’t clearly indicate the button’s purpose, this can confuse people.
- It’s static and won’t automatically update with dynamic content changes.
- Localization is manual—you need to integrate these labels into your internationalization setup.
Use aria-label when simplicity outweighs these drawbacks—like icon-only buttons that stay consistent across languages.

aria-labelledby: Harness Visible Content

aria-labelledby points directly to visible content already on the page to build the accessible name. This is super helpful for complex widgets or dialogs:
```
<div role="dialog" aria-labelledby="dialog-title">
  <h2 id="dialog-title">Settings</h2>
  
</div>
```
This is great because:
- Updates to referenced elements automatically update the accessible name—handy for localization or dynamic UI changes.
- You can reference multiple IDs to build richer, descriptive names.
The downside? It requires stable IDs. Reference a missing ID, and your screen reader users will hear nothing—a silent fail you won’t catch easily without testing.

Picking the Right Attribute

Choosing between these two attributes boils down to visibility and localization:
- Visible text already on screen? Use aria-labelledby.
- Icon-only or hidden label? Use aria-label.
- Multiple languages or dynamic content? Lean heavily towards aria-labelledby.
Following these simple guidelines can help keep your UI accessible and your codebase clean.

Common Mistakes (And How to Dodge Them)

Let’s get real: we’ve all made these mistakes:
1. Using both attributes at once: Screen readers only honor aria-labelledby. The leftover aria-label just confuses whoever touches your code next.
2. Referencing IDs that don’t exist: Silent errors are the worst. Double-check your references with automated tools like axe-core.
3. Static English aria-labels on multilingual sites: Always leverage your translation pipeline or use aria-labelledby with translated DOM elements.
Quick example: Imagine a delete button labeled with aria-label="Delete" in English. When your app gets translated into Spanish, this button label stays stuck in English. Switching to aria-labelledby referencing a translated element solves it instantly.

Performance and Maintenance Tips

In frameworks like React or Vue, manage your DOM carefully. Always ensure referenced elements exist in the DOM before referencing components mount. Add automated accessibility checks (like Lighthouse) into your CI/CD setup. They’ll quickly catch misconfigured labels and help you maintain consistent accessibility.

Advanced Label Composition

Need more detail? Stack IDs with aria-labelledby:
```
<span id="action">Confirm</span>
<span id="item">your subscription</span>
<button aria-labelledby="action item">...</button>
```
Now the screen reader clearly announces, “Confirm your subscription.”

Dynamic content? Even simpler:
```
const statusLabel = document.getElementById("status");
statusLabel.textContent = isExpired ? "Expired" : "Active";
// aria-labelledby references statusLabel automatically
```
This dynamic updating is invaluable for reactive or state-driven UI.

Testing Your Accessible Names

Don’t skip manual checks. Fire up VoiceOver, NVDA, or even JAWS and tab through your components the way real users do. Navigate end‑to‑end, listen for odd announcements, and confirm the focus order feels right. Then pair those spot checks with automated tools in CI so labeling issues get fixed long before code ships.

Wrapping Up: Making Strategic Choices

Understanding when to use aria-label versus aria-labelledby might seem minor, but it significantly impacts users’ experience. Choose aria-label for simplicity and directness, especially on icon-driven interfaces. Go with aria-labelledby when leveraging visible, dynamic, or localized content.

Remember, accessibility is about making your interfaces clear for everyone, not just users relying on assistive tech. The strategic use of these attributes ensures your app feels polished and intuitive.

Need a quick gut‑check? Schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital. We’ll walk through your codebase together and make sure every label—and the rest of your accessibility stack—hits the mark.
Greg McNeil

May 9, 2025

How-to Guides

Accessibility, ARIA, aria-label, Web Accessibility, web developers, web development

Accessible Accordion vs Disclosure: Dev Best Practices

Disclosures and accordions show up all over the place—FAQs, menus, settings panels—you name it. They seem simple enough, right? But making sure they actually work for everyone takes more than just toggling some content and calling it a day.

If you’ve ever wondered when to use <details> versus building an accordion with buttons and ARIA, or how to keep screen reader users from getting lost in a sea of hidden panels, you’re not alone. This guide breaks it all down—what to use, when to use it, and how to build a truly accessible accordion without overcomplicating the code.

What Are Disclosure and Accordion Widgets?

Disclosure Widgets: Simple, Native, and Often Overlooked

Disclosures—also known as show/hide widgets—are ideal for toggling a single section of content. Think expandable FAQs or inline help that doesn’t clutter the UI by default.

Here’s a basic example using semantic HTML:

<details>
  <summary>Need more info?</summary>
  <p>Here are more details you might find useful.</p>
</details>

This pattern is fully native and built into the browser, which means it comes with keyboard support and screen reader compatibility right out of the box. You also get the open attribute, which allows you to control whether the content is expanded by default.

The main advantage here is simplicity—no JavaScript needed, and fewer chances to introduce accessibility issues.

Accordion Widgets: More Complex, More Control

An accessible accordion expands on the idea of disclosure by managing multiple content panels. In most implementations, only one section is open at a time, helping users stay focused and reducing cognitive overload.

You can build an accordion using multiple <details> elements, but if you want to control behavior more precisely—like closing other panels when one opens—you’ll need JavaScript.

Here’s what a minimal HTML-only version might look like:

<details name="accordion">
  <summary>Step 1</summary>
  <p>Instructions for step one.</p>
</details>

But to meet WCAG standards for a true accessible accordion, you’ll need to manage keyboard navigation, state indicators, and focus behavior—topics we’ll cover next.

Accessibility Considerations Developers Must Prioritize

Keyboard Navigation That Works for Everyone

An accessible accordion must support meaningful keyboard interactions. Here’s what users expect:

Tab and Shift + Tab to move between interactive elements.
Enter or Space to toggle a section open or closed.
Arrow Up/Down or Home/End to move between accordion headers in more advanced versions.

Missing any of these can make your component unusable for keyboard users. The WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices offer detailed guidance on accordion interaction patterns—worth bookmarking for reference.

Use Semantic Elements—Always

If there’s one golden rule, it’s this: never sacrifice semantics for styling.

That means:

Use <button> for interactive triggers—not <div>, <span>, or anchor tags without href.
If you’re toggling visibility, it’s a button, not a link.
Ensure that elements behave as users (and assistive technologies) expect.

Using semantic elements is one of the most effective ways to ensure your accessible accordion behaves predictably across screen readers and input types.

Add ARIA Where Needed, Not Everywhere

ARIA should enhance native HTML—not replace it. But when you’re building a custom accordion in JavaScript, ARIA becomes essential for communicating component state.

Here’s a basic implementation:

<button aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="info">More Info</button>
<div id="info" hidden>
  <p>Here’s the additional info.</p>
</div>

const btn = document.querySelector('button');
const content = document.getElementById('info');
btn.addEventListener('click', () => {
  const expanded = btn.getAttribute('aria-expanded') === 'true';
  btn.setAttribute('aria-expanded', String(!expanded));
  content.hidden = expanded;
});

This ensures screen readers can track whether content is visible or hidden, creating a seamless experience for all users.

Common Accessibility Mistakes (and How to Fix Them)

Even seasoned devs slip up. Here are a few common issues that can break accessibility—and how to address them:

Mistake Problem Solution

Non-focusable triggers <div>s with onclick don’t work for keyboard users Use <button> or add tabindex="0"

Links used instead of buttons <a> without href doesn’t convey intent Replace with semantic <button>

Missing state feedback Screen readers can’t detect if content is expanded Dynamically update aria-expanded

Focusable elements in hidden content Users tab into content they can’t see Use hidden or display: none correctly

Most of these issues stem from skipping semantic HTML or relying too heavily on JavaScript without proper state management. An accessible accordion avoids these pitfalls by focusing on clarity, intent, and interaction feedback.

Best Practices for Developers

Building an accessible accordion that holds up in the real world means going beyond code snippets. Here’s what to keep in mind:

Start with Progressive Enhancement

Whenever possible, begin with HTML <details> and <summary>. They’re accessible by default and supported in all major browsers. Use JavaScript only when additional behavior—like limiting panels to one open at a time—is truly needed.

Prioritize Focus Visibility

An accordion is only as accessible as its focus states. Make sure every interactive element has a visible focus indicator, and don’t override :focus-visible in your CSS. This isn’t just a WCAG 2.2 requirement—it’s also just good UX.

Avoid Overengineering with ARIA

Don’t reach for ARIA unless you need to. Native HTML tends to be more robust across assistive technologies, and using ARIA incorrectly can make things worse. When in doubt, simplify.

Test Like a User

If you’re not testing with a keyboard, you’re flying blind. Add screen reader testing with NVDA, JAWS, or VoiceOver into your QA flow. Run Lighthouse and WAVE scans, but don’t rely on them alone—they won’t catch everything an actual user would encounter.

Real-World Application: From Good to Great

Let’s say you’re rebuilding a legacy FAQ section. It uses JavaScript to toggle open answers, but it’s riddled with <div>s and missing ARIA.

Start by replacing the markup with semantic HTML:

<details>
  <summary>What’s your return policy?</summary>
  <p>You can return items within 30 days.</p>
</details>

Then, enhance with JavaScript if you want only one section open at a time. Layer in ARIA attributes to improve screen reader support. Suddenly, you’ve turned a clunky widget into a polished, accessible accordion that works for everyone.

Wrapping It Up

Disclosures and accordions might seem interchangeable, but the differences matter—especially when accessibility is on the line. Whether you’re working on a quick FAQ or building a fully dynamic interface, an accessible accordion ensures users with different abilities can navigate and interact with your content.

At the end of the day, accessibility isn’t about checking boxes—it’s about building better interfaces for everyone.

Need help auditing your components?

216digital offers in-depth accessibility support. Schedule an ADA compliance consultation to review your current implementation and ensure everything meets WCAG standards—without compromising design or performance.

Greg McNeil

May 8, 2025

How-to Guides

Accessibility, accessible accordion, Disclosure, How-to, HTML, semantic HTML, web developers, web development

What Makes an Image “Decorative”?

Common Decorative Image Types

Making the Right Call: Informative or Decorative?

How to Properly Mark Decorative Images in Code

Use an Empty Alt Attribute

Use role="presentation" or aria-hidden="true"

What’s the Difference?

Best Practices & Pitfalls to Avoid

Why It Matters: The Impact of Doing It Right

Beyond Alt Text: Decorative Images Are Just One Part

Keep Image Accessibility Intentional

What Does “Bolting It On” Look Like?

Accessibility Planning = Smart, Strategic Design

6 Stages Where Accessibility Belongs

1. Discovery and Strategy

2. UX and Visual Design

3. Content Creation

4. Front-End Development

5. Testing and QA

6. Launch and Maintenance

The Human Side of Accessibility

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Why It Pays Off

No Ifs, Ands, or Bugs—Just Accessibility Plans

What WCAG 2.4.2 Actually Requires

Who Benefits from Descriptive Page Titles?

Common Title Mistakes (And How to Fix Them)

Better Examples

Accessibility and SEO: They Work Together

Tips for Great Titles

How to Improve Your Titles—Step by Step

Audit Your Site

Apply a Simple Template

Loop in Your Team

Add it to Your Checklist

The Risks of Getting It Wrong

Final Thoughts: Titles That Work for Everyone

Ready to Take Action?

Misuse of Heading Structures for Visual Styling

Why It Matters

How to Fix It

Overreliance on Theme Defaults for Color Contrast

Accessibility Risk

Practical Fixes

Improper List Markup Practices

Why It’s a Problem

Best Practices

Neglecting Contextual Relevance in Alt Text

Why It Matters

What Developers Can Do

Overuse and Misapplication of ARIA Attributes

The Real Cost

Smarter ARIA Use

Overlooking Keyboard Navigation and Focus Management

Key Accessibility Concerns

Developer-Friendly Fixes

What True Accessibility Looks Like in WordPress

New and Noteworthy ARIA Attributes

aria-errormessage

Example

aria-description

Example

aria-details

Example

aria-keyshortcuts

Example

aria-placeholder

Example

Emerging ARIA Roles Enhancing Semantic Meaning

Editorial and Collaborative Roles

Example

Technical and Temporal Roles

Example

role=”image”

Example

Practical Implementation Considerations

Assessing Support Across Assistive Technologies

Tested Environments (May 2025)

Best Practices for Adoption

Conclusion

Use `role="presentation"` or `aria-hidden="true"`

`aria-labelledby`: Harness Visible Content