The political landscape around disability rights can shift quickly. Yet, for state and local governments, the legal requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) do not vanish. Title II of the ADA makes sure people with disabilities have equal access to government programs and services. Even when leaders talk about changing rules, the obligation to comply with Title II remains.
A recent court case, Ellerbee v. State of Louisiana, shows how serious these rules are. This case has become a wake-up call for many. It sends a clear message: do not wait to make your digital services accessible, or you might face a lawsuit.
ADA Title II Compliance: What Hasn’t Changed
Under Title II, state and local governments must provide equal access to public services. This includes websites, online forms, and mobile apps. The ADA has always covered digital content, even though earlier laws did not spell it out as clearly as modern rules do. Some governments may be waiting for new regulations to make changes. But that is risky because Title II has long required equal access online.
Recent regulations point to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as the standard. But just because these rules are more precise now does not mean the core obligation is new. Governments that do not meet these accessibility standards can still face legal action from private citizens or advocacy groups. Federal or local policy shifts do not take away the chance of a lawsuit.
Ellerbee v. State of Louisiana: A Court-Ordered Reality Check
In January 2025, a judge ruled that the State of Louisiana must make its websites accessible right away. The plaintiff, Beau Ellerbee, is blind. He sued Louisiana because he could not use its government websites. Louisiana claimed it did not have to follow accessibility standards yet because new federal deadlines were not in effect. However, the judge disagreed. The court said the ADA’s rules already exist and cannot be brushed aside.
This ruling is important. It reminds all governments that waiting for future deadlines is dangerous. The court made it clear that Title II compliance is an immediate duty, not an optional one. If a website is not accessible, people can sue and win—right now. Governments should note this and avoid ignoring their responsibilities.
Political Uncertainty and Compliance: What We Know and Don’t Know
Many leaders wonder if changing political priorities will affect Title II compliance. Some worry that the rule could be canceled. While it is possible, changing a major rule is hard. It takes a long time to undo a regulation, so it will not happen overnight.
Federal enforcement efforts can shift. Some administrations may push more or fewer investigations into accessibility. However, lawsuits from individuals and groups will not just stop. They can still file legal cases when they face barriers. Relying on reduced enforcement is risky. The question is: should you wait? The answer is no. Even if federal agencies slow down, private lawsuits will keep coming. Governments must stay prepared.
Upcoming Deadlines for Digital Accessibility
Here are the upcoming deadlines for digital accessibility:
- Large municipalities (population more than 50,000) and public universities: April 2026
- Smaller municipalities (population under 50,000) and special districts: April 2027
Essential Steps for Title II Compliance
But as we have learned, these deadlines do not mean you can wait until the last minute. Being proactive is essential. Governments should take the following steps now:
- Conduct Accessibility Audits: Check your websites, mobile apps, and PDFs to find barriers. Consulting with a specialist firm like 216digital to conduct a thorough audit can also be a wise investment.
- Prioritize High-Impact Services: Focus first on key areas like emergency services, tax portals, and public benefits. These are used most often.
- Implement Ongoing Training: Train your staff, especially those involved in website management and content creation, about web accessibility.
- Monitor and Maintain Compliance: Accessibility is ongoing. After fixing issues, keep testing, new accessibility issues will arise over time.
- Document Efforts: Keep records of your audits, training sessions, and updates. This shows good faith in meeting Title II requirements.
Legal Precedents Are Changing—Is Your Business Ready?
Although the recent uproar in Louisiana focused on Title II, there is a growing concern that courts could apply the same level of scrutiny to Title III, which governs private businesses. When judges see states being held responsible for inaccessibility under Title II, it is not a stretch to imagine them enforcing strict guidelines for private companies under Title III of the ADA.
Private online businesses that have not yet addressed accessibility may be at risk. Website accessibility lawsuits against private companies are on the rise. For instance, in 2017, federal lawsuits related to inaccessible websites and apps stood at around 814. By 2024, that number had soared to more than 4,000. If the tide can turn so quickly for state and local governments, private businesses should assume that Title III enforcement could intensify just as fast.
The Path Forward Amid Uncertainty
Political changes may create doubt, but the duty to follow Title II remains. The Ellerbee v. State of Louisiana ruling shows that waiting for future deadlines can lead to immediate lawsuits. If you manage a government website or any public-facing digital service, now is the best time to address accessibility needs.
The same principle applies to private businesses. If you have questions about making your online presence meet ADA guidelines, consider scheduling an ADA briefing with 216digital. Our team of accessibility experts can develop strategies to integrate WCAG 2.1 compliance into your development roadmap on your terms so you can focus on what matters — your business.
