ADA Lawsuit Archives - Page 3 of 4/Tag

Avoid ADA Lawsuits: Lessons from Big Companies
Over the past few years, many well-known companies have faced lawsuits under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for failing to make their websites accessible. From retail giants like Nike and Target to entertainment brands like Beyoncé’s Parkwood Entertainment, these companies have all encountered legal challenges due to non-compliant websites.

These cases provide an important lesson for website owners and content creators: web accessibility is not just a risk for big corporations but especially those running small businesses. Small companies are quickly becoming targets for Title III lawsuits as well. But by proactively making your website accessible, you can avoid legal trouble and enjoy several long-term benefits.

Let’s examine some of the big companies that have been sued over website accessibility and how small businesses can protect themselves.

1. Winn-Dixie: The ADA Case that Set the Standard

Winn-Dixie was one of the first major brands to face a Title III lawsuit over website accessibility. In 2017, a blind customer sued the grocery chain because its website wasn’t compatible with screen reader software. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, marking a major precedent for future cases. This case highlighted how even websites that aren’t strictly e-commerce-based can be required to meet ADA standards.

2. Domino’s Pizza: The Fight Over Online Ordering

Domino’s Pizza was sued because a blind customer couldn’t use their website and app to order food. The case gained national attention when it reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 2019. Domino’s argued that the ADA didn’t apply to websites, but the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, leaving the lower court ruling in favor of the plaintiff. The lesson? ADA Title III applies to digital spaces just as much as physical locations.

3. Nike: Accessibility in the Retail Space

Nike was sued for having an inaccessible website that prevented visually impaired users from making purchases. The company quickly settled the case and implemented changes, demonstrating that the cost of fighting a lawsuit can be much higher than simply fixing accessibility issues upfront.

4. Blue Apron: The Subscription Service Challenge

Blue Apron, a meal-kit delivery service, faced a lawsuit when a blind customer was unable to sign up because the website didn’t work with screen readers. Blue Apron’s case showed that even digital-first businesses are vulnerable to accessibility claims.

5. KitchenAid: The Importance of Universal Access

KitchenAid, known for its appliances, was sued after a visually impaired user couldn’t navigate their website to access product information. This case underscores that accessibility isn’t just about e-commerce; it also includes providing equal access to all the content and information on your website.

6. Fox News Network: ADA in Online Media

Even media companies aren’t immune. Fox News faced a lawsuit for not making its website accessible to people with visual impairments. News outlets, entertainment brands, and other content-heavy websites should ensure that their pages are fully compliant with ADA guidelines.

7. Beyoncé’s Parkwood Entertainment: Entertainment and Inclusivity

In 2019, a visually impaired woman sued Beyoncé’s Parkwood Entertainment, claiming that her website wasn’t accessible with screen readers. This case shows that artists, musicians, and entertainment companies are also responsible for making sure their digital content is inclusive for all.

8. H&R Block: Financial Services

Tax preparation giant H&R Block was sued over their inaccessible website. The company settled by agreeing to make its site accessible and compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). This case demonstrates that financial services are held to the same standards as retail or entertainment when it comes to web accessibility.

9. Burger King: Fast Food, Fast Accessibility Fixes

Burger King was sued when a visually impaired customer couldn’t use its website to place an order. Like many companies, Burger King settled the case by agreeing to fix its accessibility issues rather than dragging out a lengthy court battle.

10. Target: A Retailer Making ADA a Priority

Target was sued in 2006 and eventually settled, becoming one of the first major retailers to make their website fully accessible. Their case set an early example that many other companies have followed.

How Small Businesses Are Becoming Targets for ADA Lawsuits

While these cases involved large companies, small businesses are increasingly being targeted by ADA Title III lawsuits. This shift is largely due to the rise in website accessibility lawsuits in general, which have grown significantly in recent years. Small businesses are often seen as easier targets because they may lack the resources to fight a lawsuit or may be unaware of their legal obligations under the ADA.

The reality is that no business is too small to be sued over website accessibility. This means that whether you’re running a local boutique or a nationwide e-commerce store, you need to be proactive about making your site accessible.

The Benefits of Web Accessibility

Beyond avoiding lawsuits, making your website accessible offers several benefits:
- Broaden Your Audience: An accessible website can be used by people with disabilities, which represents a significant portion of the population. By making your site accessible, you’re opening your business to more customers.
- Improved SEO: Many accessibility improvements, like proper alt text for images, can also boost your search engine ranking.
- Enhanced User Experience: Accessibility improvements often go hand-in-hand with usability improvements, making your site easier to navigate for all users.
- Positive Brand Reputation: By demonstrating that your business values inclusivity, you can enhance your brand’s reputation and build customer loyalty.
How to Calculate Your Return on Investment (ROI)

When thinking about the cost of making your website accessible, it’s important to consider the return on investment (ROI). While the upfront cost of an accessibility audit or remediation might seem high, the long-term benefits far outweigh the cost of a lawsuit.

To calculate your ROI for ADA Compliance, consider:
1. Initial Accessibility Audit: This will tell you where your site currently stands and what changes need to be made. The cost will vary depending on the size and complexity of your website.
2. Implementation Costs: These are the costs associated with fixing the accessibility issues identified in the audit. Again, this can vary but should be viewed as an investment in future-proofing your business.
3. Avoided Lawsuits: The cost of fighting a Title III lawsuit can be substantial, both financially and reputationally. By being proactive, you can avoid these costs altogether.
4. Expanded Customer Base: More accessible websites mean more potential customers. The boost in revenue can quickly outweigh the costs of compliance.
How Being Proactive with Web Accessibility Offers an Incredible ROI

The companies mentioned earlier learned the hard way that it’s always better to be proactive rather than reactive when it comes to website accessibility. Fixing accessibility issues after a lawsuit is filed is much more expensive than addressing them upfront. Not to mention, proactively making your website accessible can help you avoid the reputational damage that often accompanies ADA lawsuits.

Protect Your Online Business

Don’t wait for a lawsuit to take action on web accessibility. Get ahead of potential risks by ensuring your site is compliant now. At 216digital, we’re here to help you navigate the complexities of ADA compliance and safeguard your business. Schedule a personalized ADA briefing with us today to understand how you can protect your online presence, avoid costly lawsuits, and expand your customer base through an accessible website. Let’s future-proof your business together—schedule your ADA briefing now!
Greg McNeil

September 27, 2024

Legal Compliance

ADA, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA Title II, web accessibility lawsuits
Common Web Accessibility Pitfalls That Invite ADA Lawsuits
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires businesses to make their websites accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities. When websites fail to meet accessibility standards, they risk facing lawsuits. In recent years, ADA lawsuits related to digital accessibility have surged, with businesses large and small getting sued for non-compliance. But what exactly are the most common issues that lead to these lawsuits?

This article will highlight the most common web accessibility barriers that lead to ADA lawsuits and provide real-world examples of lawsuits related to these issues.

1. Missing Alt Text

Alt text, or alternative text, provides a written description of an image on a webpage. Screen readers, which visually impaired users use to navigate the internet, read this description aloud.Without alt text, users with visual impairments have no way of knowing what an image represents.

For example, if a website has an image of a product for sale, the alt text might say, “Red shoe, size 8.” Without this text, screen reader users won’t know what the image shows, making it difficult to interact with the website.

Missing or incorrect alt text is one of the most common reasons for ADA lawsuits. Many businesses overlook this small but important step, leaving essential images without descriptions.

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 1.1.1 – Non-text Content

All non-text content, such as images, must have a text alternative that serves the same purpose.

Example ADA Lawsuit: Fox News Network LLC

Fox News Network LLC was sued because its website didn’t provide proper alt text for many images. Luc Burbon, a visually impaired user, relied on screen readers to browse the internet. When trying to navigate Fox News’ website, he encountered images without alt text, leaving him unable to understand key content. The court agreed with Burbon, emphasizing that websites must be accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities.

2. Non-Descriptive Interactive Elements

Interactive elements, like buttons and links, are crucial for navigating a website. However, if these elements aren’t appropriately labeled, users who rely on screen readers won’t know what a button or link does. This leads to confusion, frustration, and can make essential parts of the website inaccessible to users with disabilities.

For example, a button labeled “Click Here” without explaining what it does will leave screen reader users guessing, especially if there’s more than one on a page. Adding contextually relevant content to the visual or accessible label, such as “Click here to learn more about our coffee” will differentiate the element while also giving users additional context.

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 4.1.2 – Name, Role, Value

Interactive elements should have clear labels that explain their purpose.

Example ADA Lawsuit: NIKE, Inc.

Maria Mendizabal filed a class-action lawsuit against Nike, claiming that the website had many links that were either redundant or completely empty. Users with visual impairments couldn’t understand the purpose of these links, making it challenging to navigate the site. This lawsuit demonstrates the importance of appropriately labeling interactive elements so everyone can understand them.

3. Lack of Keyboard Navigation

Many users with disabilities rely on keyboards to navigate websites, especially those who can’t use a mouse. If a website doesn’t allow for keyboard-only navigation, or if drop-down menus can’t be accessed with a keyboard, it becomes unusable for people with mobility impairments.

For example, if a menu only opens when hovered over with a mouse, someone using only a keyboard won’t be able to open it, blocking their access to critical sections of the site.

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 2.1.1 – Keyboard

All functionality should be accessible using a keyboard.

Example ADA Lawsuit: Parkwood Entertainment LLC

In 2019, a lawsuit accused Parkwood Entertainment because Beyoncé’s official website, Beyonce.com, did not provide accessibility for users relying on screen readers.. Mary Conner, the visually impaired plaintiff, couldn’t navigate the drop-down menus using her keyboard. This prevented her from accessing important content and services, leading to a lawsuit.

4. Inaccessible Forms

Forms are commonly used on websites—for everything from signing up for newsletters to making purchases. However, forms that are difficult for people with disabilities to fill out can create barriers. Missing labels on form fields, unclear error messages, or forms that don’t work with keyboard navigation are common accessibility issues that lead to lawsuits.

For instance, if a form field asks for a phone number but doesn’t have a proper label, a screen reader user won’t know what to enter. Or, if an error message isn’t clear about what went wrong, visually impaired users won’t be able to correct their mistakes.

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 3.3.2 – Labels or Instructions

Ensure input fields have proper labels and instructions so users know what information is required.

Example ADA Lawsuit: H&R Block Lawsuit

A notable example of this issue is the lawsuit involving the National Federation of the Blind and H&R Block. In this case, visually impaired users discovered that H&R Block’s website did not correctly label the forms. When these users tried to input their contact information or create an account, they struggled because the screen readers failed to indicate what information they needed or where to enter it.

5. Inaccessible Pop-Ups and Modals

Pop-ups and modals (dialog boxes that appear on top of a page) are common features on websites for everything from newsletter sign-ups to product promotions. However, if they are not designed with accessibility in mind, they can disrupt the user’s experience.

Pop-ups cause confusion if they appear without warning or if users can’t close them using a keyboard. Users relying on screen readers or assistive devices may not even know that a pop-up has appeared, making it impossible for them to continue interacting with the page.

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 1.3.1 – Info and Relationships

When new content, like a pop-up, appears on the screen, announce it to the user and explain how it connects to the rest of the website.

Example ADA Lawsuit: Five Guys Enterprises

In a lawsuit against Five Guys, a visually impaired customer couldn’t complete an online order because an inaccessible pop-up appeared when trying to add fries to her cart. Her screen reader didn’t recognize the pop-up, making it impossible for her to finish the purchase. This case highlights the importance of making pop-ups accessible to everyone.

How to Avoid ADA Lawsuits

Avoiding ADA lawsuits starts with a proactive approach to web accessibility. Making your website accessible is not only a legal obligation but also an opportunity to provide a better user experience for all visitors, regardless of ability. Here are key steps you can take to avoid common accessibility pitfalls:
1. Understand Web Accessibility Guidelines: The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) are a set of standards designed to make web content more accessible. Familiarize yourself with these guidelines to understand what needs to be done. They cover aspects like text readability, alternative text for images, and keyboard navigation.
2. Conduct a Website Audit: Regularly audit your website for accessibility issues. There are tools available online that can help you identify problems, such as missing alt text for images or issues with color contrast. Consulting with a specialist firm like 216digital to conduct a thorough audit can also be a wise investment.
3. Implement Ongoing Training: Train your staff, especially those involved in website management and content creation, about web accessibility. This helps create a culture of inclusivity and ensures that accessibility remains a priority.
4. Stay Informed and Up-to-Date: Web accessibility standards and best practices can evolve over time. Stay iCompliance is not a one-time task. 216digital’s a11y.Radar service provides ongoing monitoring. It detects any new accessibility issues that may arise over time. This proactive approach helps prevent potential violations before they lead to costly lawsuits.”
Conclusion

Making sure your website is ADA-compliant is not just about avoiding lawsuits—it’s about ensuring that everyone, no matter their abilities, can access and enjoy your content. With the rise in ADA lawsuits, it’s more important than ever to take a proactive approach to web accessibility. Whether it’s fixing missing alt text or ensuring keyboard navigation, addressing these common issues can save your business time and money in the long run.

If you’re unsure where to start or need help maintaining compliance, 216digital is here to help. Through our years of experience analyzing these cases, we understand how ADA non-compliance lawsuit firms identify their targets. We can help you protect your business from these risks. At 216digital, we will develop a strategy to integrate WCAG 2.1 compliance into your development roadmap. This will allow you to focus on other tasks on your to-do list.

So don’t wait any longer; find out where you stand by scheduling a complementary ADA strategy briefing today.
Greg McNeil

September 25, 2024

Legal Compliance, WCAG Compliance

Accessibility, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA Website Compliance, digital accessibility, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, Web Accessibility
2024 Mid-Year Report ADA Lawsuits Trends

As we reach the midpoint of 2024, it’s crucial for business owners, project managers, and web development teams to stay informed about trends and challenges related to ADA lawsuits, especially concerning web accessibility. In recent years, the landscape of digital accessibility has evolved significantly, impacting businesses of all sizes across various industries. This article aims to provide a comprehensive mid-year report on ADA lawsuits, upcoming trends, and proactive measures to protect your online business.

Trends in 2024 for ADA Lawsuits

As we move through 2024, the landscape of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuits is undergoing significant changes. Several emerging trends reflect shifts in legal practices, targets of litigation, and evolving standards in web accessibility. Here’s a comprehensive look at what you can expect in the upcoming months.

Decrease in Overall ADA Lawsuit Numbers

For the first time in years, there has been a slight decrease in the number of ADA lawsuits filed. In fact, we are anticipating to have 600 less federal court case than in 2023. This reduction is primarily due to increased judicial scrutiny. Judges now require plaintiffs and their legal teams to present more detailed and specific claims. Vague or generic allegations no longer suffice to move forward in court. This heightened scrutiny is filtering out cases deemed frivolous or opportunistic, leading to a decrease in the overall number of filings.

Impact of Recent Defense Victories

Recent defense victories in federal ADA claims have also contributed to this decline. These victories have set precedents that make it more challenging for plaintiffs to succeed with less substantiated claims. As a result, some law firms are shifting their focus to state courts, where they might perceive a higher chance of success. This shift is impacting the overall landscape of ADA lawsuits, with fewer cases reaching the federal level.

Small Companies Are in the Crosshairs

Interestingly, there has been a significant shift in the targets of ADA lawsuits. Over 66% of the lawsuits filed through June 2024 have been against companies with revenues under $25 million. In contrast, 34% have been against larger companies. This shift is a natural progression after years of lawsuits targeting major corporations. Many of the largest companies have already faced lawsuits and implemented comprehensive accessibility programs, leaving smaller businesses as the new focus for plaintiffs.

The Rise of eCommerce and ADA Violations

The rise in eCommerce, driven by changing consumer spending habits, has exposed more small and medium-sized businesses to potential ADA violations. As these businesses expand their online presence, they become more susceptible to lawsuits if their websites are not fully accessible. Smaller businesses may lack the resources or knowledge to ensure full compliance with ADA requirements, making them vulnerable targets for litigation.

Overlays Could Make You a Target Now More Than Ever

Despite significant investments in accessibility widgets, these tools often fail to reduce legal risks effectively. In fact, in 2024, plaintiffs have already filed 503 lawsuits against websites with active widgets, compared to 449 in 2023. This is a 20% increase in lawsuits against websites using widgets and screen overlays. These tools are marketed as quick fixes for accessibility issues but frequently fall short of their promises.

Common Problems with Widgets

It has been proven that accessibility widgets can create additional barriers for users with disabilities. Common problems include incompatibility with screen readers, failure to address all accessibility concerns, and even introducing new issues. These limitations highlight that relying solely on widgets is not an adequate solution for legal protection or genuine accessibility improvements. Businesses must seek comprehensive solutions to ensure their websites are fully accessible.

Evolving Legal Standards

The legal landscape surrounding web accessibility is continuously evolving. On April 8, the U.S. Attorney General signed a new rule under ADA Title II, setting clear web accessibility standards for state and local governments. This means their services, programs, and activities must now be accessible to people with disabilities. Depending on the size of their websites, these entities have two to three years to implement these accessibility standards.

Potential Changes to ADA Title III

While the current update focuses on public sector entities under ADA Title II, it could serve as a model for changes to Title III, which covers public accommodations and commercial facilities. This potential shift might lead to stricter and more uniform accessibility standards in the private sector, affecting businesses and nonprofits that interact with the public.

Increased DOJ Enforcement

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is expected to increase enforcement efforts, ensuring that businesses comply with these evolving standards. This means that businesses must stay informed about these changes and proactively work towards compliance to avoid potential lawsuits and penalties. Staying ahead of these legal standards will be crucial for businesses to minimize legal risks and enhance accessibility for all users.

The Importance of Staying Informed

Staying informed about the latest trends and legal changes in ADA compliance is crucial for businesses of all sizes. This not only helps in avoiding potential lawsuits but also ensures that businesses are accessible to all customers, enhancing their reputation and customer satisfaction. Companies should consider consulting with legal experts and accessibility professionals to stay ahead of the curve and implement best practices in web accessibility.

How to Protect Your Online Business

Navigating the complexities of ADA compliance can seem daunting, especially for those with limited knowledge of web accessibility standards. However, there are practical steps you can take to mitigate the risk of lawsuits and foster a more inclusive digital environment:

1. Conduct an Accessibility Audit

Start by conducting a comprehensive accessibility audit of your website. This involves assessing your site’s adherence to WCAG standards and identifying areas that may pose accessibility barriers. Consider engaging accessibility experts or using automated tools to assist in this process.

2. Implement Accessibility Improvements

Based on the findings of your audit, prioritize and implement necessary accessibility improvements. This may include optimizing navigation for keyboard users, providing alternative text for images, ensuring color contrast ratios comply with standards, and making multimedia content accessible.

3. Train Your Team

Educate your web development team, content creators, and digital marketers about web accessibility best practices. Training sessions can help increase awareness of accessibility guidelines and empower your team to proactively address accessibility issues in their respective roles.

4. Monitor and Maintain Accessibility

Accessibility is an ongoing commitment. Regularly monitor your website for accessibility compliance and address any new issues that arise. Incorporate accessibility checks into your regular maintenance routines to ensure ongoing compliance.

5. Seek Legal Guidance if Needed

If you receive a demand letter or face a lawsuit related to ADA non-compliance, seek legal guidance promptly. ADA litigation can be complex, and legal professionals specializing in accessibility law can provide valuable counsel and representation.

Conclusion

As we move forward in 2024, the landscape of web accessibility and ADA compliance continues to evolve. By prioritizing accessibility in your digital strategy and staying informed about legal requirements, you not only mitigate legal risks but also enhance the overall user experience for all visitors to your website. Remember, accessibility is not just a legal obligation but also a moral imperative to ensure inclusivity and equal access to information in the digital age.

For more information on ADA compliance and web accessibility best practices, schedule a complimentary ADA strategy briefing with 216digital. Together, we can create a more inclusive online environment that benefits businesses and individuals alike.

Greg McNeil

August 19, 2024

Legal Compliance

ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA non-compliance, ADA Website Compliance, Website Accessibility
What CFOs Need to Know to Mitigate the Risk of Digital ADA Lawsuits
As the digital landscape becomes more integral to business operations, the responsibilities of a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have expanded beyond traditional financial oversight. One area that garnered significant attention is mitigating risks associated with digital Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuits. These lawsuits are on the rise and pose a legal threat as well as a financial and reputational one. For CFOs in Corporate America, understanding how to navigate these risks is crucial.

The Rise of Digital ADA Lawsuits

The ADA was enacted in 1990 to ensure equal access to public spaces for individuals with disabilities. While initially focused on physical locations, the ADA has evolved to include the digital realm. As more businesses operate online, websites and mobile applications are increasingly considered “public spaces” under the ADA. Companies must ensure that their digital platforms are accessible to people with disabilities.

Failure to comply with these requirements can result in costly lawsuits. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in digital ADA lawsuits, with thousands of cases filed annually. These lawsuits often target companies with websites or apps that are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, such as those with visual, auditory, or cognitive impairments.

Why CFOs Should Be Concerned About ADA Lawsuits

CFOs are responsible for managing their organization’s financial health, which includes mitigating risks that could lead to financial loss. Digital ADA lawsuits represent a significant risk for several reasons:
1. Financial Penalties: Non-compliance with ADA requirements can result in substantial fines and legal fees. These costs can quickly escalate, mainly if a company is involved in multiple lawsuits. For example, businesses that violate Title III of the ADA may face a maximum civil penalty of $75,000 for a first violation. Subsequent violations have been seen with up to a $150,000 fine.
2. Reputational Damage: In today’s socially conscious environment, failing to provide accessible digital experiences can harm a company’s reputation. Negative publicity from an ADA lawsuit can lead to losing customer trust and loyalty, ultimately affecting the bottom line.
3. Operational Disruption: ADA lawsuits can be time-consuming and disruptive to business operations. Companies may need to divert resources to address the legal proceedings and change their digital platforms.
4. Market Competitiveness: Companies prioritizing digital accessibility are better positioned to reach a broader audience, including the estimated 26% of the U.S. population living with a disability. This can provide a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Critical Steps to Mitigating Digital ADA Lawsuit Risks

CFOs are critical in mitigating the risks associated with digital ADA lawsuits. They can help protect their organization from legal action by taking proactive steps and ensuring compliance with ADA requirements. Here are the key steps CFOs should consider:

Conduct a Comprehensive Accessibility Audit

The first step in mitigating ADA risks is to understand the current state of your organization’s digital accessibility. This involves conducting a comprehensive accessibility audit of your website, mobile apps, and other digital platforms. An audit will identify areas where your digital assets fall short of ADA compliance and provide a roadmap for remediation.

There are different types of accessibility audits, ranging from automated scans to manual testing by accessibility experts. While automated tools can quickly identify some issues, manual testing is essential for detecting more nuanced problems that automated tools might miss. A combination of both methods is often the most effective approach.

Implement a Remediation Plan

Once the audit is complete, the next step is implementing a remediation plan to address the identified issues. This plan should prioritize the most critical accessibility barriers and outline a timeline for making the necessary changes. It’s essential to involve key stakeholders, including web developers, content creators, and legal teams, in the remediation process to ensure that all aspects of digital accessibility are covered.

Establish Ongoing Monitoring and Maintenance

Digital accessibility is not a one-time project; it requires ongoing monitoring and maintenance. As your organization updates its digital platforms, new accessibility issues may arise—regular accessibility audits and monitoring tools, such as 216digital‘s a11y. Radar can help ensure that your digital assets remain compliant over time.

Ongoing monitoring is also essential for preventing frivolous ADA lawsuits. By maintaining a high level of digital accessibility, your organization can demonstrate its commitment to compliance, making it less likely to be targeted by opportunistic lawsuits.

Integrate Accessibility into Your Business Strategy

CFOs should advocate for integrating digital accessibility into the broader business strategy. This includes incorporating accessibility considerations into the design and development processes of new digital products and services. By making accessibility a core component of your organization’s digital strategy, you can reduce non-compliance risk and create a more inclusive user experience.

Stay Informed About Legal Developments

The legal landscape surrounding digital ADA compliance is continually evolving. CFOs must stay informed about changes in regulations, court rulings, and best practices for digital accessibility. This knowledge will enable you to anticipate potential risks and proactively mitigate them.

Partnering with legal experts who specialize in ADA compliance can also be beneficial. These professionals can guide the latest developments and help ensure your organization’s digital assets align with current legal requirements.

Build a Culture of Accessibility

Finally, fostering a culture of accessibility within your organization is critical to long-term compliance. This means educating employees about the importance of digital accessibility and providing them with the tools and training they need to create accessible content and experiences.

CFOs can lead by example by championing accessibility initiatives and allocating the necessary resources to support them. By embedding accessibility into your organization’s culture, you can create a sustainable approach to compliance that extends beyond the minimum legal requirements.

Wrapping Up

As CFOs in Corporate America, mitigating the risk of digital ADA lawsuits is a critical responsibility. By conducting thorough accessibility audits, implementing effective remediation plans, establishing ongoing monitoring, and integrating accessibility into the business strategy, CFOs can protect their organizations from legal, financial, and reputational harm. Moreover, by building a culture of accessibility, they can position their companies as leaders in inclusivity, ultimately driving long-term success.

Digital accessibility is not just a legal obligation; it’s a business imperative to enhance your company’s reputation, expand its customer base, and ensure compliance in an increasingly complex regulatory environment. Taking proactive steps today can save your organization from costly lawsuits and contribute to a more inclusive digital world for everyone.

Ready to take the next step? Schedule a complimentary ADA Strategy Briefing with 216digital today and start building a more accessible future for your company.
Greg McNeil

August 9, 2024

Legal Compliance

ADA, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA Lawsuits, digital accessibility, Web Accessibility, web accessibility lawsuits, Website Accessibility
How CTOs Can Mitigate the Risk of ADA Lawsuits
As the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) in a corporate environment, you bear a significant responsibility: overseeing the technological backbone of your organization. This Role has evolved beyond managing IT infrastructure and software development in today’s digital landscape. One critical aspect that demands your attention is digital accessibility—a legal and ethical obligation that, if neglected, can expose your organization to the growing threat of digital ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) lawsuits.

Understanding the Digital ADA Landscape

The ADA, enacted in 1990, was initially intended to ensure that people with disabilities have equal access to public spaces. With the digital revolution, this principle has extended to the online world, mandating that websites, mobile apps, and other digital assets be accessible to all users, including those with disabilities. In recent years, lawsuits have been filed targeting companies whose digital properties are not compliant with the ADA. These lawsuits allege that inaccessible websites and apps discriminate against users with disabilities, violating the ADA’s principles.

The Rising Tide of Digital ADA Lawsuits

The number of digital ADA lawsuits has skyrocketed over the past few years. In 2023 alone, plaintiffs filed 4,605 federal and state-filed ADA-related digital lawsuits across the United States. This trend shows no sign of slowing down, with organizations of all sizes—small businesses to Fortune 500 companies—finding themselves in litigation.

What’s driving this surge? Several factors contribute:
1. Increased Awareness and Advocacy: Disability advocacy groups are more vocal than ever, raising awareness about digital accessibility issues and encouraging individuals to take legal action.
2. Legal Precedents: Courts have increasingly ruled that websites and other digital platforms are extensions of physical spaces and must be accessible under the ADA.
3. Regulatory Scrutiny: The Department of Justice (DOJ) has clarified that digital accessibility is a priority, further emboldening plaintiffs to file lawsuits, stating:
4. “…the Department has consistently taken the position that the ADA’s requirements apply to all the goods, services, privileges, or activities offered by public accommodations, including those offered on the web.”– US Department of Justice | Guidance on Web Accessibility and the ADA (2022)
5. Automation of Legal Processes: Some law firms leverage automation to identify non-compliant websites and initiate lawsuits at scale, making pursuing such cases more accessible and lucrative. In fact, the top 10 plaintiff law firms in 2023 account for more than 80% of all federally filed cases.
The Financial and Reputational Risks

For CTOs, the implications of a digital ADA lawsuit are significant. The financial costs can be staggering, including legal fees, settlement amounts, and the expenses associated with remediating your digital properties to meet compliance standards. Additionally, there is the risk of punitive damages, mainly if your organization is found to have willfully ignored accessibility requirements.

Beyond the financial impact, there is also the potential damage to your organization’s reputation. A lawsuit can tarnish your brand image, leading to negative press coverage and losing trust among consumers, partners, and investors. In a world where corporate responsibility and inclusivity are increasingly valued, failing to prioritize digital accessibility can undermine your organization’s standing in the marketplace.

Key Areas of Vulnerability for a ADA Lawsuits

As CTO, you must recognize the key areas where your organization may be vulnerable to digital ADA lawsuits:
1. Website Accessibility: Your organization’s website is often the primary target of ADA lawsuits. Key issues include missing alt text for images, poor keyboard navigation, and a need for compatibility with screen readers. Even minor oversights can lead to significant legal trouble.
2. Mobile Applications: With the rise of mobile-first strategies, ensuring your apps are accessible is crucial. This includes providing text alternatives for non-text content and ensuring that all interactive elements are readily usable by individuals with disabilities.
3. Digital Documents: PDFs, Word documents, and other downloadable files on your website must be accessible. This means using proper tagging, ensuring screen readers can interpret content accurately, and providing alternative formats when necessary.
4. E-commerce Platforms: If your organization operates an online store, the checkout process must be fully accessible. Issues such as inaccessible forms, missing labels, and problematic error messages can expose your organization to legal action.
5. Third-Party Integrations: Any third-party tools or plugins used on your website or app must also be accessible. Relying on non-compliant third-party solutions does not absolve your organization of liability.
Proactive Measures to Mitigate Risk

Mitigating the risk of digital ADA lawsuits requires a proactive approach. As CTO, you are pivotal in implementing strategies that ensure your digital properties are compliant and accessible. Here’s how to get started:
1. Conduct a Comprehensive Accessibility Audit: Conduct a thorough audit of your digital properties. This should include both automated and manual testing to identify accessibility issues. Automated tools can quickly highlight apparent problems, while manual testing ensures that the most nuanced matters are caught. Partnering with a firm like 216digital can give you the expertise needed to conduct a robust audit.
2. Implement Accessibility Remediation: Once the audit is complete, prioritize the remediation of identified issues. This may involve updating your website’s code, redesigning certain elements, or working with third-party vendors to ensure their tools are accessible. Remember, accessibility is an ongoing process, not a one-time fix.
3. Adopt an Accessibility-First Mindset: Integrate accessibility into your development lifecycle. This means ensuring that all new digital products and updates are designed with accessibility. Educate your development team on accessibility best practices and incorporate accessibility checks into your quality assurance processes.
4. Stay Informed on Legal and Regulatory Developments: The legal landscape surrounding digital accessibility is constantly evolving. Stay informed about the latest court rulings, DOJ guidance, and state-specific regulations that may impact your organization. This knowledge will help you anticipate potential risks and adapt your strategy accordingly.
5. Engage in Ongoing Monitoring and Maintenance: Accessibility is not a set-it-and-forget-it task. Regularly monitor your digital properties to ensure ongoing compliance. Tools like 216digital’s a11y.Radar service offers continuous monitoring, helping you stay ahead of potential issues and avoid costly lawsuits.
6. Develop an Accessibility Statement: An accessibility statement on your website demonstrates your commitment to inclusivity and transparency. It should outline your organization’s steps to ensure accessibility, provide contact information for users to report issues, and offer alternative ways to access content.
The Role of 216digital in Mitigating ADA Lawsuits

At 216digital, we understand the complexities and challenges of achieving and maintaining digital accessibility. Our comprehensive services are designed to support CTOs like you in mitigating the risk of ADA lawsuits while ensuring that your digital properties are inclusive for all users, from conducting thorough accessibility audits to providing ongoing monitoring with our a11y. Radar service offers the expertise and tools needed to safeguard your organization.

Conclusion

As a CTO in Corporate America, understanding and mitigating the risk of digital ADA lawsuits is crucial to your Role. By prioritizing accessibility, you protect your organization from legal and financial repercussions and contribute to a more inclusive digital landscape. With the right strategies and partners, you can confidently navigate this complex issue, ensuring that your digital properties are compliant, accessible, and free from the threat of costly litigation.Ready to take the next step? Schedule a complimentary ADA Strategy Briefing with 216digital today and start building a more accessible future for your organization.
Greg McNeil

August 9, 2024

Legal Compliance

Accessibility, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA Lawsuits, ADA Website Compliance, CTOs, web accessibility lawsuits, Website Accessibility
The True Cost of ADA Lawsuits: More Than Just Settlements
As a business owner with an online presence, you’re likely familiar with the importance of keeping up with legal requirements and ensuring your website meets certain standards. However, one area that might not be on your radar but deserves serious attention is web accessibility and the potential for ADA lawsuits.

Understanding Web Accessibility

Web accessibility refers to the practice of ensuring that websites and web applications are usable by everyone, including people with disabilities. This includes making content perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust for all users, regardless of their abilities or disabilities.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted in 1990 to prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities in all areas of public life, including jobs, schools, transportation, and public and private places that are open to the general public. Over the years, courts have extended ADA requirements to include websites and digital platforms, considering them as places of public accommodation.

The Rise of ADA Lawsuits

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in lawsuits against businesses alleging that their websites are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. These lawsuits typically cite violations of the ADA, claiming that inaccessible websites prevent full and equal access to goods and services.

The cost implications of these lawsuits are often underestimated by businesses. While the immediate financial impact of a settlement can be substantial, the true costs extend far beyond just the monetary figure agreed upon.

Direct Costs: Settlements and Legal Fees

Let’s start with the obvious: the direct costs. When a business is sued for ADA non-compliance, the most immediate expense is usually the settlement paid to the plaintiff. Settlement amounts can vary widely but often range from several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars. In addition to the settlement, businesses often incur significant legal fees defending against these lawsuits, which can escalate quickly depending on the complexity and duration of the case.

Indirect Costs: Reputational Damage and Lost Opportunities

Beyond the financial impact, ADA lawsuits can also have indirect costs that are harder to quantify but equally damaging. One such cost is reputational damage. In today’s digital age, news of an ADA lawsuit can spread quickly through social media and online platforms, potentially tarnishing a business’s reputation and undermining customer trust. For businesses that pride themselves on inclusivity and fairness, being embroiled in an accessibility lawsuit can contradict their values and negatively impact their brand perception.

Moreover, while dealing with a lawsuit, businesses may lose focus on core activities and strategic initiatives. The time and resources spent on legal proceedings could otherwise be invested in improving products and services, expanding market reach, or enhancing customer experiences.

Long-Term Costs: Compliance and Accessibility Upgrades

Perhaps the most overlooked aspect of ADA lawsuits is the long-term cost of achieving compliance and maintaining accessibility. Achieving ADA compliance involves not just fixing issues highlighted in the lawsuit but implementing a comprehensive accessibility strategy that ensures ongoing compliance with evolving standards.

This may include redesigning website elements, restructuring content, integrating assistive technologies, and training staff to create and maintain accessible digital content. These efforts require investments in time, technology, and expertise, all of which contribute to the total cost of addressing accessibility concerns raised by an ADA lawsuit.

The ROI of Web Accessibility

Despite the daunting costs associated with ADA lawsuits, there is a compelling case for investing in web accessibility beyond mere compliance. Research indicates that accessible websites tend to have better usability for all users, resulting in improved user experience, increased engagement, and potentially higher conversion rates. Moreover, catering to a broader audience can open up new market opportunities and enhance customer loyalty.

Taking Action: Protecting Your Business

As a website owner, protecting your business from ADA lawsuits begins with understanding and prioritizing web accessibility. Here are some proactive steps you can take:
1. Conduct an Accessibility Audit: Start by assessing your website’s current level of accessibility. Identify areas that need improvement and prioritize fixes based on their impact on usability and compliance.
2. Implement Accessibility Best Practices: Familiarize yourself with web accessibility guidelines such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Implementing these best practices not only helps in compliance but also improves usability for all users.
3. Train Your Team: Educate your content creators, designers, and developers about accessibility standards and best practices. Encourage a culture of accessibility within your organization to ensure that accessibility considerations are integrated into all aspects of your digital presence.
4. Monitor and Maintain Accessibility: Accessibility is not a one-time fix but an ongoing commitment. Regularly monitor your website for accessibility issues and address them promptly. Keep abreast of changes in accessibility standards and technology to stay ahead of potential compliance issues.
5. Consult with Experts: If you’re unsure where to start or need guidance, consider consulting with accessibility experts or hiring professionals who specialize in web accessibility audits and remediation.
Conclusion

Navigating the complexities of ADA compliance and web accessibility can seem daunting, but you don’t have to go it alone. The financial and operational impacts of ADA lawsuits can be far-reaching, from legal fees to reputational damage, and the ongoing investment in accessibility upgrades. By proactively integrating web accessibility into your business strategy, you not only mitigate the risk of costly lawsuits but also enhance the overall user experience and showcase your commitment to inclusivity.
At 216digital, we’re here to help you navigate these challenges with ease. Schedule a complimentary ADA strategy briefing with us to gain valuable insights and practical solutions tailored to your needs. Let us help you turn accessibility into a strategic advantage, ensuring that your digital presence is inclusive, innovative, and poised for success.
Greg McNeil

July 17, 2024

Legal Compliance

Accessibility, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA Lawsuits, ADA non-compliance, ADA Website Compliance
Navigating Digital Accessibility Regulation in 2024

Significant changes in digital accessibility legislation took place in 2023 that will significantly affect how businesses operate online in 2024. Accessibility has become a central focus in the United States Department of Justice, state legislatures, and even in Europe. These changes will have implications for businesses going forward, and it is essential for them to remain informed, assess their current status, and comply with the latest regulations.

To help you stay updated on these developments, we have created this blog post to assist you in keeping track of everything in the digital accessibility space.

ADA Digital Accessibility at the Federal Level in the US

In August 2023, the Department of Justice shared a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) about digital accessibility that’s been getting a lot of attention. This NPRM proposes a specific technical standard that state and local governments must follow to meet their existing obligations under Title II of the ADA.

Key points from the NPRM proposals include:

WCAG 2.1 AA

The proposal suggests using WCAG Version 2.1, Level AA, as the rules for making websites and mobile apps easier to navigate. WCAG stands for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, and it was created to help make the Internet more accessible for everyone.

Websites and Mobile Apps

These rules would apply to the websites and mobile apps that state and local governments use to share information or provide services to the public. For instance, if a local government lets people pay for parking using a mobile app, that app would need to follow these rules to make sure it’s easy for everyone to use.

Compliance Timeline

The DOJ also suggests that state and local governments follow these technical standards within two or three years after the final rule is published, depending on their population size. Smaller public entities, with populations under 50,000 people, would have three years to comply. In contrast, larger ones, with populations of 50,000 or more, would have two years to meet the standard.

Additional details are available in the NPRM‘s “Requirements by Entity Size” section.

State-led Legislation for Digital Accessibility

While federal regulations set a baseline, several states are proactively addressing digital accessibility within their own jurisdictions. Let’s look at some notable examples:

California Assembly Bill 1757

California has introduced Assembly Bill 1757. This bill aims to make it illegal for any provider of online resources to create, license, distribute, or maintain an internet website for public use that does not meet the accessibility standards outlined in the [WCAG 2.1 Level AA].

If this bill becomes law, it may have an impact on business activities within the state, as well as have personal consequences for individual web developers. Developers may find themselves facing lawsuits from both businesses and individuals with disabilities. The recent changes to the bill eliminate the possibility of developers claiming ignorance, as the responsibility threshold has shifted from “knowingly or intentionally to include “negligently” engaged in constructing an inaccessible website. Furthermore, the updated wording prevents developers from shifting liability to the companies that hired them.

AB 1757 is currently under consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee, and there is heightened attention on whether it will progress into law. All eyes are on this legislation, anticipating its potential implications.

Rhode Island Bills 2023 H-5106 and S-0105

Senators Ujifusa and Representative Vella-Wilkinson are focused on the DOJ’s NPRM proposal. They’ve put forward two bills in Rhode Island: 2023 H-5106 (PDF) and 2023 S-0105 (PDF). These bills aim to make sure that all new websites available to the public follow the ADA’s digital accessibility rules before they go live. On the other hand, existing public websites have until July 1, 2028, to meet WCAG 2.1 AA standards.

The Minnesota House Bill HF-480

Minnesota has proposed Bill HF-480, aiming to allocate funds to the Minnesota Council on Disabilities. The goal is to offer training, aid, and assistance to cities and counties, helping them meet the required standards for website accessibility. Additionally, the bill proposes an annual report detailing the figures related to website accessibility training, technical support, and outreach. It also includes estimates of the costs involved in implementing recommended changes to the websites of cities and counties.

Rhode Island’s Digital Accessibility and Equity Governance Board

Governor Healey of Massachusetts is following in the footsteps of Rhode Island and Minnesota by taking a proactive stance on digital accessibility. She recently signed an Executive Order creating the Digital Accessibility and Equity Governance Board. The board’s goal is to make sure that all digital applications are fully functional and accessible to everyone.

The board will establish and maintain standards, guidelines, and policies for digital accessibility and equity. It will also collaborate with other executive branch offices and agencies to develop procurement policies, contractual standards, and other relevant documents that support digital accessibility efforts.

Hawaii’s HB1419 Bill

On January 1, 2023, Hawaii’s Bill HF-480 brought in the “Hawaii Electronic Information Technology Disability Access Standards” to make digital content more accessible. As of July 1, 2023, all state organizations must check these access standards and update their rules, policies, and procedures for getting and creating digital content.

Kansas Takes a Different Approach

While some states are becoming stricter about digital accessibility, Kansas is making headlines with a unique law. As of July 1, 2023, The Act Against Abusive Website Access Litigation allows local businesses to take legal action against individuals and their lawyers who file lawsuits about website accessibility under the ADA.

The purpose is to counter what is considered “abusive” litigation and seek compensation for defense costs and even punitive damages. Lawsuits can be filed in any jurisdiction. However, this Kansas law will only be in effect until the Department of Justice issues regulations on website accessibility under Title III of the ADA.

The European Accessibility Act

Looking beyond the US, the European Accessibility Act (EAA) is set to bring about substantial changes. With a looming deadline of June 28, 2025, the act aims to improve the accessibility of products and services. This includes public and private websites and mobile applications, including US-based companies selling to the EU sector.

Before the EAA, different accessibility rules existed throughout EU member states, making it difficult for digital product vendors and purchasers. The EAA has standardized accessibility requirements, making it easier for everyone involved.

But suppose you are an online business selling to the EU sector. In that case, it is crucial to make sure that your practices comply with the European Accessibility Act before the deadline arrives.

Implications for Online Businesses

Staying informed about digital accessibility legislation is essential for online businesses aiming to foster inclusivity and avoid legal challenges. The 2023 announcements at both federal and state levels in the US and the impending deadline in the EU underscore the global importance of ADA compliance.

Businesses should closely monitor updates, assess their current digital accessibility status, and take steps to align with the latest regulations. By doing so, they not only mitigate legal risks but also contribute to a more accessible and inclusive online environment.

Preparing for the Future with 216digital

Regardless of where you are on your journey, we’re here to help. At 216digital, we can assist you in developing a strategy to integrate WCAG 2.1 compliance into your development roadmap on your terms. Our expert team will assess your website, provide recommendations, and implement the necessary adjustments to make sure your website meets the latest accessibility standards.
Contact us today to schedule a complementary ADA Strategy Briefing so that you can confidently embrace the future of digital accessibility.

Greg McNeil

February 27, 2024

Legal Compliance

Accessibility, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA non-compliance, ADA Website Compliance, digital accessibility, Website Accessibility
2023 Web Accessibility Lawsuit Trends and Insights
Web accessibility is no longer just a buzzword for the tech-savvy; it has become a crucial aspect of every online business. The surge in ADA-related lawsuits in 2023 serves as a wake-up call for website owners, developers, and digital marketers. Ignorance is no longer bliss, and understanding the trends can be the key to safeguarding your online presence in 2024.

For companies of all sizes, this raises a pair of essential questions:
1. What is behind this rise in litigation?
2. Is my business at risk?
In this post, we break down the 2023 web accessibility lawsuit trends and provide insights to help you navigate the evolving landscape. In today’s digital world, being informed isn’t just advantageous—it’s essential.

A Shift in Web Accessibility

Advocates for digital platforms being included in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) have made significant progress in 2023. The Department of Justice (DOJ) declared that by 2024, all state and local websites must adhere to WCAG AA standards. This move shows that websites and mobile apps are just as important as physical places.

Right now, the declaration above only applies to state and local government groups under Title II of the ADA. But private businesses, often under Title III, might have to follow similar rules soon. This success, along with other updated state laws like California’s Assembly Bill (AB) 1757, has encouraged supporters to take legal action in record numbers.

A Closer Look at the Numbers

The numbers are in, and they’re striking: Plaintiffs filed 4,605 federal and state-filed ADA-related digital lawsuits, 683 more than in 2022. 3,086 of these lawsuits went through federal courts, whereas 1,519 were in state courts. This shift emphasizes the growing significance of state lawsuits in digital accessibility.

New York and Web Accessibility Lawsuits

In fact, Plaintiff firms file almost 75% of all lawsuits in New York federal or state courts. Although we have seen increased lawsuits outside the prominent three regions of New York, California, and Florida, New York is still the king.

But don’t get excited if you are outside of these states. The internet has no boundaries; having customers in a state is enough to be susceptible to legal action. For instance, your online business may be in Ohio. Still, a customer in New York State can file a claim in New York for your website having web accessibility barriers. Your location has no bearing.

But what if you are just a small online business? You should be safe, right?

What Industries Are Most at Risk?

eCommerce websites are more likely to be sued than other industries, such as Food Service and Education. In fact, 80% of all lawsuits are against eCommerce websites, with the majority of cases filed by visually impaired or blind individuals. This is because more and more businesses are selling online than ever before. eCommerce websites constantly change and frequently have complex functionality, making them more susceptible to legal issues.

Want to know more about eCommerce ADA litigation? In that case, check out our article, “Retail is the Prime Target for ADA Web Accessibility Lawsuits.“

Suppose you have already been sued for web accessibility, you should be safe from subsequent lawsuits, right? Unfortunately, the data says otherwise.

Copycat Accessibility Lawsuits Are On the Rise

It is not surprising that 25% of web accessibility lawsuits in 2023, more than 700, were filed against businesses that have previously been involved in ADA digital lawsuits. This highlights the prevalence of legal issues related to accessibility.

Why the Surge in Copycat Lawsuits?

Unfortunately, the ADA does not protect a company with an inaccessible website, regardless of how often they have been sued, when the lawsuits occurred, or whether they settled to make improvements.

Any new user who encounters barriers on a website can file a lawsuit against that website or any other websites or apps owned by the same company. This may lead to copycat lawsuits from new plaintiffs.

The bottom line? If digital content is not accessible, the risk of legal repercussions is substantial. But how should online businesses protect themselves against ADA claims in 2024? Web accessibility widgets and overlays?

Web Accessibility Widgets and Overlays

Many companies that offer accessibility widgets claim to be the ultimate solution for overcoming barriers and even promise legal protection from ADA cases. If you search on Google for web accessibility solutions, you’ll find numerous companies competing for your attention. However, these widgets fall short of being the magical fix many hoped for.

In 2023, 933 businesses using accessibility widgets faced lawsuits, a 62% increase from the previous year. These legal actions often point out the widget features and functionality as causes of accessibility barriers, along with common WCAG failures. But why is that the case?

The Pitfalls of Web Accessibility Widgets and Overlays

One major issue with accessibility widgets is that they don’t address the fundamental access barriers on websites. Although these issues are not visible to most users, they pose significant challenges for people with disabilities.

Furthermore, overlays can only identify 30% of web accessibility errors. Unfortunately, overlay tools struggle to handle the complexity of WCAG guidelines and cannot make the comprehensive changes necessary. The remaining 70% of issues can only be identified through manual testing.

The trend of filing ADA complaints and lawsuits against companies using accessibility widgets will continue into 2024. Achieving complete ADA or WCAG compliance requires more than just overlays or widgets. So, what should you do?

How to Keep Your Online Business Safe

It’s crucial to make sure that your website and online applications follow ADA web accessibility rules to lower the risk of getting sued. This might mean teaming up with web accessibility experts to review your site and make any necessary changes.

To avoid ADA web accessibility litigation, online businesses should take the following steps:
1. Review your website: Conduct a comprehensive web accessibility audit to identify all barriers.
2. Make a plan: Once you find the barriers, address the issues identified in the audit. Start with the most critical issues first.
3. Train Staff: Show your team how to follow the best practices for web accessibility and keep things accessible in the future.
4. Use helpful tools: Frequently test your websites or apps for accessibility with tools like web accessibility monitoring services.
5. Accessibility Partner: Get support from experts who focus on accessibility to make sure you’re following ADA requirements.
6. Stay Updated: Stay updated on WCAG standards and update your websites and apps when needed.
Conclusion

In today’s digital age, web accessibility is non-negotiable. Whether you aim to protect against ADA lawsuits or strive for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance, taking immediate and comprehensive action is vital. At 216digital, we understand the nuances of ADA lawsuits and can help develop a strategy to integrate accessibility into your development roadmap.

Schedule a complimentary ADA Strategy Briefing today to learn more about securing ongoing, real-world accessibility on your terms.
Greg McNeil

January 23, 2024

Legal Compliance

ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA Web Accessibility, ADA Website Compliance, Web Accessibility, web accessibility lawsuits
Web Accessibility: The Wayfair Example
Wayfair, one of the internet’s leading home goods and furniture retailers, was hit with another class action lawsuit in June. The lawsuit alleged that the company’s website was not accessible to legally blind customers.

In this legal action, Seana Cromitie, a visually impaired woman, claimed that she encountered accessibility issues while attempting to purchase a shoe rack from Wayfair’s website. These issues, she argued, denied her the same level of access to Wayfair’s online products, content, and services as sighted customers.

Cromitie’s lawsuit is part of a growing wave of web accessibility litigation filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). But what can business owners learn from Wayfair’s recent allegations and the dangers of ignoring web accessibility?

Below, we’ll discuss the plaintiff’s claims, providing tips for avoiding and responding to ADA demands.

The Americans with Disabilities Act

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil law designed to protect the rights of people with disabilities in all areas of public life. While it doesn’t specifically mention websites, the courts have made it clear that the ADA applies to websites, whether they’re owned by government agencies or private businesses.

In July 2023, the Department of Justice (DOJ) suggested a new rule to ensure that online services provided by state and local governments become more accessible under Title II of the ADA. Although Title III, pertaining to privately owned businesses, has yet to see changes, the DOJ published guidance in 2022 confirming its position that the ADA does apply to websites, stating:

“…the Department has consistently taken the position that the ADA’s requirements apply to all the goods, services, privileges, or activities offered by public accommodations, including those offered on the web.”– US Department of Justice | Guidance on Web Accessibility and the ADA (2022)
– US Department of Justice | Guidance on Web Accessibility and the ADA (2022)

Failure to do so can result in legal action, as Wayfair’s recent case demonstrates. But what are the legal standards for ADA compliance?

For an in-depth look at the proposed changes to Title II of the ADA, check out our article “The ADA’s New Shift Towards Web Accessibility”

Title III and WCAG

Due to the DOJ’s delay in releasing technical standards for web accessibility, confusion has emerged among businesses and website owners about what is required for ADA compliance.

As a result, the DOJ often refers to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as the standard for ADA web compliance. The DOJ has even joined lawsuits against businesses and organizations that have failed to meet the WCAG standards.

However, Title III of the ADA has no legal standard for web accessibility— even achieving WCAG 2.1 AA conformance does not fully protect you from lawsuits.

So, how can businesses close the door to potential litigation? Let’s take another look at Wayfair’s June court case.

Background to the Wayfair’s 2023 ADA Case

The plaintiff, Seana Cromitie, asserts that Wayfair’s website falls under the definition of a public accommodation in Title III of the ADA. Therefore, it is considered discriminatory and illegal to deny people with disabilities access to the same products and services offered to others.

The 2023 court case centers on issues that made Wayfair’s website challenging for screen reader users. Screen readers are essential tools for users with visual impairments, as they provide an auditory interpretation of the website’s content. However, Wayfair’s website lacked the necessary features to accommodate these users.

Wayfair’s Web Accessibility Barriers

The class action complaint cites several specific issues with Wayfair’s website. These key issues include:
- Missing alternative text (or alt text): Alt text is vital for users to understand what an image looks like and its function on a website. Wayfair’s website had numerous images without meaningful alt-text, making them incomprehensible to visually impaired visitors.
- Incorrectly Formatted Lists: Screen readers rely on well-structured lists for proper navigation. When the lists aren’t correctly formatted, the screen readers might read items in the wrong order or convey the list incorrectly, making it challenging for users to understand the content and move around the site.
- Unannounced Pop-ups: Pop-up windows on the website without proper announcements caused confusion for screen reader users, hindering their navigation and comprehension.
- Broken and “empty” hyperlinks: Broken links can disrupt the user’s experience by not explaining where the link or image will lead. This can frustrate users and make accessing various parts of the website challenging.
- Missing Keyboard Navigations: Requiring a mouse for specific actions creates barriers for people with motor impairments or those who rely on keyboards or other assistive tools.
Unfortunately, these barriers are widespread, leaving millions of businesses unknowingly open to frivolous lawsuits.

Common Web Accessibility Barriers

In their annual analysis of the top 1 million website home pages, WebAIM (Web Accessibility In Mind) found that 96.3% of home pages had detectable failures of WCAG.

According to their finding, many of the same barriers cited in Wayfair’s case appear in their top WCAG 2 failures, including 58.2% of homepages missing alt text for images, while 50.1% had empty links. However, both of these barriers can take seconds to remove.

Suppose businesses recognize their mistakes early and make immediate changes. In that case, the cost to correct these barriers won’t accumulate or cost as much later. Remediating thousands of issues on an e-commerce website will require a substantial investment while building for accessibility will cost much less over time.

No Business is Too Small

While Wayfair is a major retailer, small businesses are also covered by Title III of the ADA. They are responsible for providing web content that works for all users, regardless of their abilities.

In fact, smaller companies with revenues under $25 million have been frequent targets. They accounted for 77% of ADA non-compliance cases in the first half of 2023, and many plaintiffs allege the same issues cited in the Wayfair class action case.

So, what steps can your website take to ensure ADA compliance?

A Step Towards Web Accessibility

Making sure your website is web-accessible is not only a legal requirement but also a moral and business imperative. This may involve working with web accessibility experts to conduct an audit and any necessary changes.

Here are some steps you can take to improve your web accessibility:
1. Conduct a web accessibility audit: Conduct a comprehensive web accessibility audit to identify all web accessibility barriers.
2. Make a plan: Familiarize yourself with WCAG’s guidelines and work to meet or exceed their standards. Address the issues identified in the audit, prioritizing the most critical issues first.
3. Consider a dedicated accessibility team: Partner with an accessibility team to oversee ongoing web accessibility efforts and ensure compliance with ADA requirements.
4. Train and Education: Educate staff on WCAG best practices and how to maintain accessibility standards moving forward.
5. Regular Monitoring: Continuously monitor your website for accessibility issues and address them promptly.
6. Stay up-to-date: Stay informed about ADA web accessibility requirements and update websites and apps as needed.
Start Your Journey to ADA Compliance

The recent lawsuit against Wayfair is a stark reminder of the importance of web accessibility under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It’s not just a legal requirement; it’s a moral and business imperative—no matter the size of your business, accessibility matters. The case of Wayfair demonstrates the very real risks of ignoring web accessibility and the potential for costly legal action.

Whether you want to protect against a frivolous ADA accessibility lawsuit or become WCAG 2.1 AA compliant, 216digital has you covered. After years of analyzing ADA lawsuits, we’ve discerned the tactics used by law firms to pinpoint websites for groundless ADA claims and how to protect businesses against them. Our team of accessibility experts can also develop strategies to integrate WCAG 2.1 compliance into your development roadmap on your terms.

Don’t wait for a lawsuit to push you into action. Schedule a Complimentary ADA Strategy Briefing with 216digital to take the first step towards website accessibility.
Greg McNeil

October 26, 2023

Legal Compliance

Accessibility, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA non-compliance, ADA Website Compliance, Website Accessibility
Are Bots Sending Web Accessibility Demand Letters?
Web accessibility has increasingly become a focal point for online businesses in recent years. In the digital era, the importance of making sure every user has access to web content cannot be overstated. But what happens when this rightful concern becomes a potential legal pitfall for businesses?

A recent wave of demand letters related to web accessibility has left many business owners questioning their source. Are they from genuine concerned human plaintiffs, or are bots behind them?

What are Web Accessibility Demand Letters?

For those unfamiliar, a web accessibility demand letter is a legal notice sent to businesses alleging that their website is inaccessible according to the standards set by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If true, these businesses must take specific actions to become compliant or face potential legal action. This can not only dent their reputation but also incur substantial legal fees.

The number of businesses receiving these letters has increased exponentially in recent years. In 2022, more than 1,500 demand letters were sent per week. While many of these lawsuits are initiated by people with disabilities, many have questioned whether these letters are starting to come from bots.

The Wave of Demand Letters

Ogletree Deakins, a reputable legal firm, has recently noticed some unusual patterns in the series of web accessibility demand letters received by their clients. The consistency in the phrasing, formatting, and even the nature of the complaints has led them to question if these are genuinely from diverse plaintiffs or if there’s a more automated process at play.

According to Ogletree Deakins, bots may use artificial intelligence (A.I.) to scan websites for potential violations of the ADA quickly. This could allow plaintiffs to pursue hundreds of ADA claims at once, pressuring businesses to settle those claims before they lead to litigation.

What are Automated Tools?

Automated accessibility audits are tools designed to test websites for compliance with ADA guidelines. These tools can scan hundreds of web pages quickly to identify potential violations. Could plaintiffs use these tools to test large numbers of websites for ADA violations? The answer is yes, and here’s how.

Automated tools are efficient at identifying general issues with web accessibility, such as missing alt text for images, incorrect use of headings, or other standard HTML violations. While these tools might not catch every nuance of a site’s accessibility, they can provide a quick overview, potentially leading to web accessibility demand letters.

For more information about automated tools, check out our blog post, Are Web Accessibility Testing Tools Enough to Ensure Compliance.

The Problem with Bots Using Automated Tools

While it is conceivable that a plaintiff could use an automated tool to test websites for ADA violations, there is one major issue. Automated tools have substantial limitations.

Even the best-automated tools are prone to false positives. For example, an automated test could identify missing alt text for images. However, not all images are required to have alt text. Humans often must determine whether alt text is necessary, and A.I. is currently incapable of making those decisions.

Automated tools are a valuable part of thorough accessibility remediation. Their limitations could make them a poor tool for filing massive waves of lawsuits, exposing potential law firms to penalties for filing fraudulent claims.

However, this also brings into question whether a person with no intention to use a business’s products or services can file an ADA non-compliance lawsuit.

The Concept of a “Tester”

There have been instances where individuals, referred to as “testers“, detect ADA violations even when they have no real intention of using a business’s products or services. A prominent example is the case of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Deborah Laufer, where the legitimacy of the plaintiff’s intent came into question.

The U.S. Supreme Court will likely weigh in on that question in the coming months. Depending on the outcome of that case, the prospect of bots generating demand letters doesn’t seem far-fetched.

But what could this mean for website owners?

What Does This Mean for Website Owners?

For online business owners, the implications are significant. If your website isn’t ADA compliant, the risk isn’t just alienating potential customers but also facing potential litigation. The growing number of demand letters and lawsuits highlights the urgency of making your website accessible to all users, including those with disabilities. However, the question remains: should businesses react to these seemingly “copycat.”

Should You React To These Copycat Claims?

With the specter of potential bot-generated demand letters and ADA lawsuits, website owners are in a precarious position. While it’s crucial not to panic, it’s equally vital to take these claims seriously. Dismissing them offhand could lead to legal complications and considerable costs.

If you receive a web accessibility demand letter:
- Consult an Expert: Before taking any steps, consult a legal expert knowledgeable in ADA compliance and web accessibility.
- Assess Your Website: Use automated and manual audits to gauge your site’s accessibility. Automated tools offer a quick overview, but human evaluations provide in-depth insight.
- Document Everything: Keep a record of all improvements and changes made to ensure accessibility. This will be beneficial in defending your business if faced with litigation.
A New Landscape for Web Accessibility

The fear of bots sending web accessibility demand letters is not unfounded. Automated tools and the emergence of “tester” lawsuits have created a new landscape that online business owners must navigate. The primary concern for businesses should be clear: make your websites accessible. Whether the threat comes from genuine users or automated tools, ensuring compliance is not just a legal necessity but also a testament to a company’s commitment to inclusivity and equality.

Partnering with Experts: 216digital

If you’ve received an ADA demand letter, we’re here to help. Through our years of experience in the trenches analyzing and studying these cases, we can determine how ADA non-compliance lawsuit firms identify their targets and how to protect your business. At 216digital, we will develop a strategy to integrate WCAG 2.1 compliance into your development roadmap on your terms so you can continue focusing on what matters most: running your business.
Scheduling a 15-minute complimentary website audit and consultation with our experts at 216digital.
Greg McNeil

August 8, 2023

Legal Compliance

Accessibility, ADA Compliance, ADA Lawsuit, ADA non-compliance, ADA Website Compliance, Website Accessibility

1. Winn-Dixie: The ADA Case that Set the Standard

2. Domino’s Pizza: The Fight Over Online Ordering

3. Nike: Accessibility in the Retail Space

4. Blue Apron: The Subscription Service Challenge

5. KitchenAid: The Importance of Universal Access

6. Fox News Network: ADA in Online Media

7. Beyoncé’s Parkwood Entertainment: Entertainment and Inclusivity

8. H&R Block: Financial Services

9. Burger King: Fast Food, Fast Accessibility Fixes

10. Target: A Retailer Making ADA a Priority

How Small Businesses Are Becoming Targets for ADA Lawsuits

The Benefits of Web Accessibility

How to Calculate Your Return on Investment (ROI)

To calculate your ROI for ADA Compliance, consider:

How Being Proactive with Web Accessibility Offers an Incredible ROI

Protect Your Online Business

1. Missing Alt Text

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 1.1.1 – Non-text Content

Example ADA Lawsuit: Fox News Network LLC

2. Non-Descriptive Interactive Elements

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 4.1.2 – Name, Role, Value

Example ADA Lawsuit: NIKE, Inc.

3. Lack of Keyboard Navigation

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 2.1.1 – Keyboard

Example ADA Lawsuit: Parkwood Entertainment LLC

4. Inaccessible Forms

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 3.3.2 – Labels or Instructions

Example ADA Lawsuit: H&R Block Lawsuit

5. Inaccessible Pop-Ups and Modals

WCAG 2.1 Guideline: 1.3.1 – Info and Relationships

Example ADA Lawsuit: Five Guys Enterprises

How to Avoid ADA Lawsuits

Conclusion

Trends in 2024 for ADA Lawsuits

Decrease in Overall ADA Lawsuit Numbers

Impact of Recent Defense Victories

Small Companies Are in the Crosshairs

The Rise of eCommerce and ADA Violations

Overlays Could Make You a Target Now More Than Ever

Common Problems with Widgets

Evolving Legal Standards

Potential Changes to ADA Title III

Increased DOJ Enforcement

The Importance of Staying Informed

How to Protect Your Online Business

1. Conduct an Accessibility Audit

2. Implement Accessibility Improvements

3. Train Your Team

4. Monitor and Maintain Accessibility

5. Seek Legal Guidance if Needed

Conclusion

The Rise of Digital ADA Lawsuits

Why CFOs Should Be Concerned About ADA Lawsuits

Critical Steps to Mitigating Digital ADA Lawsuit Risks

Conduct a Comprehensive Accessibility Audit

Implement a Remediation Plan

Establish Ongoing Monitoring and Maintenance

Integrate Accessibility into Your Business Strategy

Stay Informed About Legal Developments

Build a Culture of Accessibility

Wrapping Up

Understanding the Digital ADA Landscape

The Rising Tide of Digital ADA Lawsuits

The Financial and Reputational Risks

Key Areas of Vulnerability for a ADA Lawsuits

Proactive Measures to Mitigate Risk

The Role of 216digital in Mitigating ADA Lawsuits

Conclusion

Understanding Web Accessibility

The Rise of ADA Lawsuits

Direct Costs: Settlements and Legal Fees

Indirect Costs: Reputational Damage and Lost Opportunities

Long-Term Costs: Compliance and Accessibility Upgrades

The ROI of Web Accessibility

Taking Action: Protecting Your Business

Conclusion

ADA Digital Accessibility at the Federal Level in the US

WCAG 2.1 AA

Websites and Mobile Apps

Compliance Timeline