216digital.
Web Accessibility

ADA Risk Mitigation
Prevent and Respond to ADA Lawsuits


WCAG & Section 508
Conform with Local and International Requirements


a11y.Radar
Ongoing Monitoring and Maintenance


Consultation & Training

Is Your Website Vulnerable to Frivolous Lawsuits?
Get a Free Web Accessibility Audit to Learn Where You Stand
Find Out Today!

Web Design & Development

Marketing

PPC Management
Google & Social Media Ads


Professional SEO
Increase Organic Search Strength

Interested in Marketing?
Speak to an Expert about marketing opportunities for your brand to cultivate support and growth online.
Contact Us

About

Blog

Contact Us
  • Document Accessibility: Read Between the Lines

    Document Accessibility: Read Between the Lines

    Forms, reports, policies—documents are at the heart of how organizations communicate. They guide collaboration within teams, shape the way businesses present information to clients, and carry essential services from government agencies to the people who rely on them. Yet in conversations about accessibility, documents are often left behind while websites and apps take center stage.

    Here’s the truth: more than 1.3 billion people worldwide live with disabilities. When documents aren’t accessible, they don’t just frustrate users—they block access to opportunities, services, and information. And those barriers come with consequences: compliance risks, wasted resources, and lasting damage to trust.

    This article explores why document accessibility matters, the risks of ignoring it, and the practical steps any organization can take to make inclusivity part of every page.

    Why Documents Get Left Behind

    When accessibility comes up, the spotlight usually lands on websites and apps. Documents, by comparison, are treated like static files—uploaded once and quickly forgotten. But unlike a web page that can be redesigned or corrected on the fly, a document can sit in a folder for years, carrying the same barriers forward each time it’s shared.

    That’s where the challenge really begins. Over time, organizations accumulate thousands of forms, reports, and guides. Without document accessibility built in, every one of those files can become a roadblock for someone simply trying to get information. And here’s the irony: even if your website is fully compliant, a single inaccessible PDF can undo that progress in one click.

    Think about the typical customer or employee journey. They may interact with your website first, but sooner or later, they’ll be asked to download a policy, fill out a form, or read a report. If that moment becomes a dead end because the file wasn’t created with accessibility in mind, the experience fractures. What could have been a seamless process becomes a frustrating—and sometimes exclusionary—obstacle.

    It’s not a minor detail. It’s a gap that matters.

    The Ripple Effect of Inaccessible Documents

    Ignoring accessibility doesn’t just inconvenience a few people—it ripples outward, affecting user experience, compliance, operations, and public trust.

    Excluding People Who Rely on Assistive Technology

    Picture navigating a long policy document with no headings, a jumbled reading order, or unlabeled tables. For someone using a screen reader, that isn’t just confusing—it’s exclusion. Instead of being empowered with information, the user is essentially told: this wasn’t made with you in mind. Document accessibility flips that experience, replacing confusion with clarity and restoring equal access.

    For many people, this isn’t a matter of preference; it’s a matter of participation. A job seeker filling out an application, a student applying for financial aid, or a patient reviewing a health policy—each of these moments hinges on clear, usable documents. When accessibility is missing, doors close. When it’s present, those same doors open wide.

    Legal and Compliance Risks

    Accessibility laws don’t stop at websites. In the U.S., Section 508 requires federal agencies and contractors to make documents accessible. Courts increasingly reference WCAG in ADA-related cases, and states like California and Colorado explicitly include documents in their accessibility standards.

    This means organizations that overlook document accessibility aren’t just leaving users behind—they’re exposing themselves to avoidable legal and financial risks. Settlements, remediation costs, and reputational fallout can far outweigh the effort it would have taken to build accessibility in from the beginning.

    Strains on Operations and Budgets

    Waiting to retrofit inaccessible files is like ignoring a small leak until the basement floods. By the time the problem surfaces, you’re dealing with archives of PDFs, Word files, and PowerPoints that all need fixing. That kind of scramble drains resources at the exact moment teams need them most.

    By contrast, building accessibility into workflows from the start keeps projects moving smoothly and reduces long-term costs. It’s the difference between consistently maintaining a car and waiting for the engine to fail—one approach keeps you moving, the other leaves you stranded.

    Damage to Trust and Reputation

    Accessibility is also about values. Every time someone encounters an inaccessible document, it can feel like a closed door. On the flip side, organizations that consistently publish accessible files send a very different message: we thought of you, and you matter here.

    That kind of trust sticks. Customers who feel included are more likely to stay loyal. Employees who see their organization invest in accessibility feel valued and supported. Communities notice when organizations lead with inclusion rather than scramble after being called out.

    Habits That Make Documents Accessible

    The encouraging part is that accessibility doesn’t hinge on massive overhauls. It comes down to steady, thoughtful habits that make communication easier for everyone.

    • Start with what matters most. Prioritize high-impact files like benefits forms, contracts, or applications—where barriers are most costly.
    • Keep it clear and legible. Use readable fonts at accessible sizes, and ensure strong color contrast. Don’t make users squint or guess.
    • Guide readers with structure. Headings, bullet points, and logical reading order transform a wall of text into something navigable.
    • Write links with meaning. Swap vague text like “click here” for specifics such as “Download the 2024 Annual Report.”
    • Label charts and tables. A short title or alt text can make data accessible where it otherwise would be invisible.
    • Double-check reading order. Confirm assistive technologies present content in the intended sequence.
    • Use plain, approachable language. Accessibility and clarity overlap—what’s easier for one person usually helps everyone.
    • Think accessibility early. Bake it into templates and workflows. What’s built right the first time doesn’t have to be rebuilt later.
    • Build team confidence. Training, resources, and occasional outside expertise embed document accessibility into culture, not just checklists.

    When these habits become routine, accessibility stops feeling like an “extra step.” It becomes part of what good communication looks like.

    Building a Culture That Lasts

    Accessibility isn’t a one-off project—it’s a mindset. Organizations that delay or treat it as optional often find themselves scrambling later, stuck between urgent deadlines and legal requirements.

    Those that weave document accessibility into everyday work create a foundation for resilience and growth. They also discover a simple truth: when documents are accessible, they serve everyone better. Employees waste less time fixing broken files. Customers encounter fewer frustrations. Leaders gain the peace of mind that comes from knowing their communications reflect both compliance and care.

    At its core, this work is about people. Every accessible document removes one more barrier. Each one tells the reader: we see you, we planned for you, and you belong here. That’s more than compliance. That’s care in action.

    From Awareness to Action

    Accessible documents reduce inefficiency, protect against legal risks, and strengthen reputations. But beyond the practical, they serve a human purpose: making sure vital information—job applications, financial aid forms, health policies—is available to everyone.

    Document accessibility isn’t an afterthought. It’s the foundation of fair, effective communication.

    If your organization is ready to turn awareness into action, schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital. We’ll help you build a strategy that makes accessibility part of your culture—so every file reflects not just compliance, but genuine inclusion.

    Greg McNeil

    September 24, 2025
    The Benefits of Web Accessibility
    Accessibility, accessible documents, accessible PDF, PDF, Web Accessibility, Website Accessibility
  • AI-powered Checks for Accessible PDF: Are They Enough?

    AI-powered Checks for Accessible PDF: Are They Enough?

    Your team ships PDFs every week—policies, forms, reports. They look polished. But if a screen reader hits the footer before the body, the file isn’t usable. That’s the gap an accessible PDF is meant to close. Laws like Section 508 and WCAG don’t treat PDFs as special exceptions; if a document lives on your site, people should be able to move through it as easily as a web page. AI helps with the basics and saves time. The real question: how far can you trust it on its own?

    Before we dig into tools, here’s how the standards actually fit together.

    What An Accessible PDF is—And Why the Law Cares

    Two complementary standards govern PDF accessibility. PDF/UA (ISO 14289) defines how a PDF’s internals must be constructed so assistive technologies can reliably parse and convey the content. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) governs outcomes when that PDF is published on the web—what users must be able to perceive, operate, understand, and rely on.

    PDF/UA (ISO 14289): Technical Conformance

    PDF/UA requires a correct structure tree with semantically appropriate tags (headings, lists, tables, figures), accurate role mapping, and a logical reading order. It expects:

    • Properly associated table headers and scopes.
    • Descriptions for non-text content; decorative material marked as artifacts.
    • Form fields (AcroForms) with programmatically associated labels, names, and instructions.
    • Declared document language and consistent language shifts where needed.
    • Links, bookmarks, and metadata that reflect actual structure.
    • The goal is consistent exposure of semantics to accessibility APIs so screen readers announce content as intended.

    WCAG for PDFs: Publication Context and User Outcomes

    When a PDF is part of web content, WCAG success criteria apply (e.g., 1.3.1 Info and Relationships, 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence, 2.4.6 Headings and Labels, 3.1.1 Language of Page). WCAG focuses on the experience: users must navigate by headings, traverse content in a meaningful sequence, operate everything via keyboard, and understand relationships in tables, lists, forms, and links.

    How They Fit Together

    Think of PDF/UA as the engineering spec (how the file is built) and WCAG as the published experience (what users can actually do). Meeting one without the other leaves gaps—either structurally sound but unusable in context, or polished in presentation but unreliable under the hood.

    Operational Definition of “Compliant”

    In practice, compliance means a screen-reader user can:

    • Move by headings in a sensible hierarchy;
    • Traverse content in sequence;
    • Complete forms with announced labels and instructions;
    • Understand tables with correctly exposed headers;
    • Access links and landmarks without detours.

    With the standards context set, let’s look at why many PDFs still miss—and where automation helps versus where expert review remains essential.

    Why PDFs Are So Often Non-compliant

    Most teams don’t author in PDF first; they export—and that’s where trouble starts. Typical failures include missing or incorrect tags, reading orders that jump around, scanned pages without OCR, and forms or tables whose structure isn’t exposed to assistive tech. A quick snapshot:

    • No tags or the wrong tags → a screen reader announces “graphic, graphic, graphic” through a one-page flyer.
    • Reading order off → Footnotes should be read before the body copy.
    • Scanned pages with no OCR → 12 images, zero searchable text.
    • Mis-structured forms/tables → required fields can’t be reached; headers don’t announce.

    At scale—monthly statements, board packets, downloadable reports—small mistakes multiply. The volume is exactly why many teams turn to automation to keep pace and to move each file closer to an accessible PDF without starting from scratch.

    What AI-powered Accessibility Tools Do Well (Today)

    Give an AI checker a clean annual report and it can often spot headings, set a reasonable reading order, and propose alt text you can refine. That alone can cut remediation time significantly. Modern tools handle a few tasks particularly well:

    • Recognizing layout blocks (headings, paragraphs, lists)
    • Running OCR on scanned content to restore real text
    • Drafting tags for simpler figures (e.g., charts vs. logos)
    • Flagging obvious misses (untagged images, empty titles, missing language metadata)

    They’re fast, consistent, and tireless. Most importantly, they reduce the grunt work so specialists can spend time where judgment matters. What they can’t do is confirm that structure equals meaning—or guarantee that the end result behaves like an accessible PDF for every user scenario.

    Where AI Still Falls Short—and Why People Still Matter

    Some documents ask more than a model can answer. Two common gotchas:

    • Nested tables and forms. A claims form with merged cells can look “tagged” but read like alphabet soup.
    • Meaning vs. style. A bold sentence in a paragraph isn’t a heading; many models tag it that way.

    Tools also struggle with language switches mid-document, disclaimers that must tie to the right section, and reading orders that look logical to software but feel disorienting in a screen reader. A file may “pass” an automated check yet remain frustrating to use. That gap is not just usability—it’s risk. A defensible review still needs a human to ask: Does this read like an accessible PDF for someone relying on assistive tech?

    The Hybrid model for Accessible PDF Compliance

    Start with the tool, finish with a person.

    • AI first pass: establish the skeleton, set reading order, surface missing text alternatives, and catch obvious metadata gaps.
    • Human pass: repair tables, confirm form flow, check headings/links, and test a few pages with NVDA or VoiceOver.
    • Evidence trail: keep a short log of what changed and who checked it; if questions come later, you have the paper trail.

    This model balances speed with judgment. It scales because automation removes repetition while reviewers focus on the parts that shape the experience and, ultimately, compliance for an accessible PDF in the real world.

    AI is Powerful, But Not a Solo Act

    AI can accelerate the work, but it can’t replace judgment. If you’re balancing risk with reality, a two-pass workflow (tool, then human) is the path that holds up. The payoff is practical: fewer errors, faster cycles, clearer records, and a more reliable accessible PDF experience for your audience.

    If you want a second set of eyes—or a process your team can pick up and run—216digital can help. Schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital, and we’ll map a workflow that fits your documents, your deadlines, and your compliance goals.

    Greg McNeil

    August 26, 2025
    Legal Compliance
    Accessibility, accessible PDF, Ai and Overlay Widgets, AI-driven accessibility, PDF, PDF/UA (ISO 14289), WCAG, Web Accessibility, Website Accessibility
  • Accessible Documents: 7 Issues You Might Overlook

    Have you ever tried to read a PDF on your phone only to pinch‑zoom until the text blurs? Now, picture that same frustration multiplied for someone who relies on a screen reader, a keyboard, or extra magnification. Inaccessible documents aren’t minor annoyances—they’re brick walls that block information. That’s why creating accessible documents is more than a best practice—it’s a necessity.

    This post walks through seven barriers often hidden inside PDFs and Word files. For each one, you’ll see why it matters, which Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) success criteria apply, and how a few practical tweaks can open the door for every reader.

    Invisible Obstacles: Why Documents Trip People Up

    Web pages are usually built with clear HTML tags that signal headings, lists, and links. Conversely, documents mix text, images, and complex layouts in a single container. If you skip semantic structure or rely on visual styling alone, those layers become invisible mazes for people using assistive tech.

    WCAG was designed for the web, yet its principles work perfectly for accessible documents. Meeting them keeps your files usable for screen readers, keyboard navigation, high‑contrast modes, and more.

    1. Missing or Misused Headings

    When screen reader users rely on heading levels to navigate, skipping or misusing them turns a well-organized document into a frustrating guessing game. Simply enlarging font size doesn’t cut it—headings need to be properly structured.

    Make it better: Use built-in heading styles (H1, H2, H3, etc.) in Word or Google Docs, not manual formatting. Stick to one H1 per page for your title, followed by a clear hierarchy.

    Don’t forget: WCAG 1.3.1 requires meaningful structure—not just visual formatting. Run an accessibility checker before exporting to PDF to make sure your headings stay intact.

    Pro tip: Set your document language, so screen readers know how to pronounce text correctly. In Word, go to Review > Language > Set Proofing Language.

    2. When PDFs Are Just Pictures

    A scanned contract that looks fine on screen may be completely silent to assistive tech. Without real text, a screen reader simply announces “graphic… graphic… graphic.” There’s no searching, no enlarging, and no reading.

    What to do instead: Use OCR (Optical Character Recognition) to create a text layer. Adobe Acrobat, ABBYY FineReader, and Google Drive all have built-in OCR tools.

    Make it work: Always proofread OCR results—blurry scans and fancy fonts often lead to errors.

    Standards check: WCAG 1.4.5 requires using real, selectable text whenever possible.

    Bonus tip: Use document properties to add a title and author—these help screen readers and improve file organization. In Word: File > Info > Properties.

    3. Color Contrast That’s Too Subtle

    That soft gray text might look sleek on a light background—but if you have low vision or are reading on a dim screen, it becomes nearly invisible.

    How to fix it: Check color combinations before publishing. Use tools like WebAIM’s Contrast Checker or Adobe’s color contrast tools.

    What the guidelines say: WCAG 1.4.3 calls for a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for standard text.

    Design reminder: Check charts, infographics, and callout boxes too—those often sneak past brand reviews.

    4. Vague Link Text

    When every hyperlink says “Click here,” a screen reader user hears the same phrase over and over, with no context. It’s like walking through unlabeled doors and hoping for the best.

    Do this instead: Write descriptive links like “Download the 2025 Benefits Guide (PDF).” This helps everyone know what to expect before they click.

    Standards note: WCAG 2.4.4 requires link text to make sense on its own.

    Extra clarity: In Word, use ScreenTips (Alt + Ctrl + D) to add hover-text instructions for links.

    5. Images Without Alt Text

    If an image doesn’t include alt text, assistive tech can’t describe it—and users miss the point. Charts, infographics, and even decorative flourishes need attention.

    Quick fix: Describe the key message, not every visual detail. For example, summarize trends or highlight data points in charts.

    WCAG compliance: Guideline 1.1.1 requires text alternatives for all meaningful images.

    Helpful tip: Tag purely decorative images as “null” or “decorative,” so screen readers skip them. For complex visuals, link to a longer description or add it in an appendix.

    6. Tables That Don’t Translate

    Tables made with tabs or manual spacing may look fine, but screen readers can’t follow the structure. Data ends up being read out of order—turning financials or schedules into a jumbled mess.

    Get it right: Use built-in table tools. Define the first row as a header and use column headers where needed.

    Testing tools: In Word: Table > Properties > Row > Repeat as header row. In Acrobat Pro, use the Table Editor and test with NVDA or VoiceOver.

    Remember: WCAG 1.3.1 also applies here—data must be presented with proper markup and relationships.

    Avoid this: Don’t use tables for layout. It may seem like a shortcut, but it often leads to accessibility headaches.

    7. Lists That Don’t Act Like Lists

    Typing dashes or asterisks might look fine visually, but to a screen reader, it’s just a single paragraph. The structure—and meaning—is lost.

    Better approach: Use the bullets or numbering tools built into Word or Docs. Real lists help assistive tech break up and interpret content correctly.

    After exporting: Run “Autotag Document” in Acrobat and verify that lists are correctly tagged.

    WCAG reference: Once again, 1.3.1—structure matters.

    8. Use Clear Language and Layout

    Overly complex language or long-winded paragraphs can be barriers in themselves. Accessibility isn’t just about code or design—it’s about comprehension too.

    Try this: Write with clarity. Use simple words, short sentences, and plenty of white space. Break things up with subheadings and bulleted lists.

    Pro tip: Aim for an 8th-grade reading level or below when possible. Tools like Hemingway Editor or Microsoft Editor can help simplify your language.

    9. Choose the Right Export Settings

    Even the best-crafted document can lose accessibility features when exported carelessly.

    Before hitting “Save As”:

    • Use formats that preserve tags, alt text, and headings (e.g., PDF/A).
    • Use built-in export tools from Word, not third-party converters.
    • Double-check using an accessibility checker like Adobe Acrobat’s.

    10. Provide Alternative Formats

    Not every user consumes content the same way. Offering alternative versions ensures a broader reach.

    Examples:

    • A transcript for a video.
    • A plain-text version of a design-heavy PDF.
    • A mobile-friendly HTML version of a Word document.
    • This level of flexibility supports users with screen readers, low vision, dyslexia, and more.

    Beyond the Basics: Keep Creating Accessible Documents

    Fixing the top document issues is a great start—but real accessibility doesn’t stop at a checklist. It’s something you build into the process and revisit as tools evolve, teams shift, and standards update.

    Don’t rely on tools alone. Automated checkers are helpful for flagging missing tags or contrast issues, but they won’t catch everything. They can’t tell if your heading structure makes sense or if your alt text actually describes the image. A quick manual review—ideally from someone who understands assistive tech—can make all the difference.

    Keep your team in the loop. Many of the most common document barriers come down to simple habits: skipping heading styles, forgetting to add alt text, or using layout tables. Short training sessions or documentation refreshers can prevent a lot of repeat issues, especially if you’re onboarding new staff or updating templates.

    Check your templates yearly. Accessibility standards grow. So do the tools we use to write, design, and export. A quick annual review of your document templates helps ensure you’re not accidentally locking in outdated practices or missing opportunities to improve.

    Make Your Documents Work for Everyone

    Document accessibility isn’t about perfection—it’s about intention. When you take the time to apply heading styles, write descriptive link text, or check contrast ratios, you’re creating something that works for more people, in more ways.

    These changes aren’t hard. They’re habits. And once your team knows what to look for, accessible documents become second nature—just like spell check or formatting a title page.

    At 216digital, we offer more than advice. We can review your files, train your staff, and even build accessible templates tailored to your needs. Every project we take on includes complementary ADA training—so your team is empowered, not just compliant.

    If you’re ready to move past the guesswork and start building documents that include everyone, schedule a quick briefing with us. Together, we can turn accessible content into a shared standard—not a scramble.

    Let’s take that first step—one document at a time.

    Greg McNeil

    April 16, 2025
    How-to Guides
    Accessibility, accessible documents, How-to, PDF, WCAG, Website Accessibility
216digital Scanning Tool

Audit Your Website for Free

Find Out if Your Website is WCAG & ADA Compliant













    216digital Logo

    Our team is full of expert professionals in Web Accessibility Remediation, eCommerce Design & Development, and Marketing – ready to help you reach your goals and thrive in a competitive marketplace. 

    216 Digital, Inc. BBB Business Review

    Get in Touch

    2208 E Enterprise Pkwy
    Twinsburg, OH 44087
    216.505.4400
    info@216digital.com

    Support

    Support Desk
    Acceptable Use Policy
    Accessibility Policy
    Privacy Policy

    Web Accessibility

    Settlement & Risk Mitigation
    WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA Compliance
    Monitoring Service by a11y.Radar

    Development & Marketing

    eCommerce Development
    PPC Marketing
    Professional SEO

    About

    About Us
    Contact

    Copyright 2024 216digital. All Rights Reserved.